<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//TaxonX//DTD Taxonomic Treatment Publishing DTD v0 20100105//EN" "https://imafungus.pensoft.net/nlm/tax-treatment-NS0.dtd">
<article xmlns:tp="http://www.plazi.org/taxpub" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" article-type="research-article" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">132</journal-id>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="index">urn:lsid:arphahub.com:pub:6d16bb82-189e-56df-a05d-907690ec8db9</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title xml:lang="en">IMA Fungus</journal-title>
        <abbrev-journal-title xml:lang="en">imafungus</abbrev-journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="ppub">2210-6340</issn>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2210-6359</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Pensoft Publishers</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3897/imafungus.17.199447</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">199447</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
          <subject>Research Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="biological_taxon">
          <subject>Ascomycota</subject>
          <subject>Basidiomycota</subject>
          <subject>Lichenized Fungi</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="scientific_subject">
          <subject>Biogeography</subject>
          <subject>Bioinformatics</subject>
          <subject>Data analysis &amp; Modelling</subject>
          <subject>DNA barcoding</subject>
          <subject>Evolutionary Ecology</subject>
          <subject>Genomics</subject>
          <subject>Habitats</subject>
          <subject> Ecosystems &amp; Natural Spaces</subject>
          <subject>Lichens</subject>
          <subject>Molecular systematics</subject>
          <subject>Phylogeny</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="geographical_area">
          <subject>Asia</subject>
          <subject>Europe</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Ultramafic specialist lichens persist through flexible symbioses structured by climate-driven filtering and modulated by substrate effects</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group content-type="authors">
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Caboň</surname>
            <given-names>Miroslav</given-names>
          </name>
          <uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2255-3816</uri>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/">Conceptualization</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing - original draft</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing - review and editing</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/">Data curation</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/">Formal analysis</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/">Funding acquisition</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/">Methodology</role>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Slovák</surname>
            <given-names>Marek</given-names>
          </name>
          <email xlink:type="simple">marek.slovak@savba.sk</email>
          <uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9917-3099</uri>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A2">2</xref>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/">Conceptualization</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing - original draft</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing - review and editing</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/">Funding acquisition</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/">Methodology</role>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Svitok</surname>
            <given-names>Marek</given-names>
          </name>
          <uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2710-8102</uri>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A3">3</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A4">4</xref>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing - original draft</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing - review and editing</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/">Formal analysis</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/">Methodology</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/">Validation</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/">Visualization</role>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Steinová</surname>
            <given-names>Jana</given-names>
          </name>
          <uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0229-4535</uri>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A2">2</xref>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing - review and editing</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/">Formal analysis</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/">Methodology</role>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Fačkovcová</surname>
            <given-names>Zuzana</given-names>
          </name>
          <uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5760-5364</uri>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/">Conceptualization</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing - review and editing</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/">Formal analysis</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/">Funding acquisition</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/">Visualization</role>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Gužiková</surname>
            <given-names>Jaroslava</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A5">5</xref>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing - review and editing</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/">Investigation</role>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Kučera</surname>
            <given-names>Jaromír</given-names>
          </name>
          <uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9983-7630</uri>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing - review and editing</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/">Investigation</role>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Paoli</surname>
            <given-names>Luca</given-names>
          </name>
          <uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5479-6428</uri>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A6">6</xref>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing - review and editing</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/">Investigation</role>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Větrovský</surname>
            <given-names>Tomáš</given-names>
          </name>
          <uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0831-486X</uri>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A7">7</xref>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/software/">Software</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/">Validation</role>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Hindáková</surname>
            <given-names>Alica</given-names>
          </name>
          <uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1445-5236</uri>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing - review and editing</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/">Investigation</role>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Senko</surname>
            <given-names>Dušan</given-names>
          </name>
          <uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0630-043X</uri>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing - review and editing</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/">Methodology</role>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Zozomová-Lihová</surname>
            <given-names>Judita</given-names>
          </name>
          <uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8950-6643</uri>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing - review and editing</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/">Investigation</role>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Melichárková</surname>
            <given-names>Andrea</given-names>
          </name>
          <uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4986-3774</uri>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing - review and editing</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/">Investigation</role>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Gajdošová</surname>
            <given-names>Zuzana</given-names>
          </name>
          <uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1395-1070</uri>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing - review and editing</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/">Investigation</role>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Guttová</surname>
            <given-names>Anna</given-names>
          </name>
          <uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9394-1077</uri>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/">Conceptualization</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing - original draft</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing - review and editing</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/">Data curation</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/">Investigation</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/">Methodology</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/">Supervision</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/">Visualization</role>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="A1">
        <label>1</label>
        <addr-line content-type="verbatim">Plant Science and Biodiversity Centre, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovakia</addr-line>
        <institution>Department of Biology and General Ecology, Faculty of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Technical University in Zvolen</institution>
        <addr-line content-type="city">Zvolen</addr-line>
        <country>Slovakia</country>
        <uri content-type="ror">https://ror.org/00j75pt62</uri>
      </aff>
      <aff id="A2">
        <label>2</label>
        <addr-line content-type="verbatim">Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic</addr-line>
        <institution>Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Charles University</institution>
        <addr-line content-type="city">Prague</addr-line>
        <country>Czech Republic</country>
        <uri content-type="ror">https://ror.org/024d6js02</uri>
      </aff>
      <aff id="A3">
        <label>3</label>
        <addr-line content-type="verbatim">Department of Biology and General Ecology, Faculty of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Technical University in Zvolen, Zvolen, Slovakia</addr-line>
        <institution>Institute of Microbiology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic</institution>
        <addr-line content-type="city">Prague</addr-line>
        <country>Czech Republic</country>
        <uri content-type="ror">https://ror.org/02p1jz666</uri>
      </aff>
      <aff id="A4">
        <label>4</label>
        <addr-line content-type="verbatim">Department of Forest Ecology, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic</addr-line>
        <institution>Department of Biology, University of Pisa</institution>
        <addr-line content-type="city">Pisa</addr-line>
        <country>Italy</country>
        <uri content-type="ror">https://ror.org/03ad39j10</uri>
      </aff>
      <aff id="A5">
        <label>5</label>
        <addr-line content-type="verbatim">Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Comenius University Bratislava, Martin, Slovakia</addr-line>
        <institution>Plant Science and Biodiversity Centre, Slovak Academy of Sciences</institution>
        <addr-line content-type="city">Bratislava</addr-line>
        <country>Slovakia</country>
        <uri content-type="ror">https://ror.org/03h7qq074</uri>
      </aff>
      <aff id="A6">
        <label>6</label>
        <addr-line content-type="verbatim">Department of Biology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy</addr-line>
        <institution>Department of Forest Ecology, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague</institution>
        <addr-line content-type="city">Prague</addr-line>
        <country>Czech Republic</country>
        <uri content-type="ror">https://ror.org/0415vcw02</uri>
      </aff>
      <aff id="A7">
        <label>7</label>
        <addr-line content-type="verbatim">Institute of Microbiology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic</addr-line>
        <institution>Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Comenius University Bratislava</institution>
        <addr-line content-type="city">Martin</addr-line>
        <country>Slovakia</country>
      </aff>
      <author-notes>
        <fn fn-type="corresp">
          <p>Corresponding author: Marek Slovák (<email xlink:type="simple">marek.slovak@savba.sk</email>)</p>
        </fn>
        <fn fn-type="edited-by">
          <p>Academic editor: Thorsten Lumbsch</p>
        </fn>
      </author-notes>
      <pub-date pub-type="collection">
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>24</day>
        <month>08</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>17</volume>
      <elocation-id>e199447</elocation-id>
      <uri content-type="arpha" xlink:href="http://openbiodiv.net/E973CE6C-E7D2-5D73-8D27-08517888539C">E973CE6C-E7D2-5D73-8D27-08517888539C</uri>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received">
          <day>12</day>
          <month>05</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted">
          <day>30</day>
          <month>07</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Miroslav Caboň, Marek Slovák, Marek Svitok, Jana Steinová, Zuzana Fačkovcová, Jaroslava Gužiková, Jaromír Kučera, Luca Paoli, Tomáš Větrovský, Alica Hindáková, Dušan Senko, Judita Zozomová-Lihová, Andrea Melichárková, Zuzana Gajdošová, Anna Guttová</copyright-statement>
        <license license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple">
          <license-p>This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <abstract>
        <label>Abstract</label>
        <p>Ultramafic substrates impose severe edaphic stress characterised by metal toxicity, nutrient imbalance, and extreme microclimatic conditions, creating spatially fragmented habitats that can shape evolutionary and ecological dynamics of associated organisms. Together with climatic variation, such factors may also influence the structure of holobiont communities of lichenized fungi. Here we investigated the ultramafic specialist lichen <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Solenopsora">Solenopsora</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="liparina">liparina</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> across its entire range. We contextualized its symbiotic associations using calcicolous congeners (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Solenopsora">S.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="candicans">candicans</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Solenopsora">S.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="cesatii">cesatii</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>), as ecological reference taxa representing contrasting substrate-associated lineages within the sampled dataset, to assess how climatic filtering acting within a specialised edaphic niche structures symbiotic partner diversity and composition. Photobionts and endolichenic fungi displayed climate-associated compositional turnover and lineage-level diversity. Variation in the composition of these symbionts was most strongly associated with precipitation during the warmest quarter and, in photobionts, with altitude and temperature seasonality. In photobionts, dominant lineages differed in their relative occurrence among host taxa, whereas low-abundance lineages were broadly shared across samples within the dataset. Despite this turnover, alpha diversity remained generally stable across environmental gradients, indicating that climatic variation most strongly affects community composition rather than within-sample diversity. The results are consistent with a model of mixed host- and substrate- associated symbiont assembly, in which dominant photobiont lineages exhibit host- or substrate-linked preferences, whereas low-abundance associates show weaker specificity and broader ecological overlap across environmental and host contexts. Overall, the findings indicate that climatic factors structure the composition of symbiotic partners without strongly altering their overall diversity, while variation among host taxa is reflected in lineage turnover of dominant symbionts. The persistence of the ultramafic specialist lichen <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Solenopsora">S.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="liparina">liparina</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> thus appears to rely on flexible, compositionally dynamic symbiotic associations shaped by climatic variation within a spatially and edaphically constrained niche, rather than obligate partner specificity. Substrate effects are interpreted here as host-associated lineage patterns rather than independently quantified drivers. More broadly, the results suggest that climatic variation can in some cases strongly influence symbiotic assembly within environmentally extreme and spatially heterogeneous systems. Substrate specialisation provides the ecological context in which such interactions occur. Together, the findings highlight the importance of climatic variation in shaping symbiotic assembly within an edaphically specialised system, emphasizing that patterns associated with host and substrate context are expressed mainly through lineage turnover rather than wholesale community replacement.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <label>Key words:</label>
        <kwd>Endolichenic fungi</kwd>
        <kwd>holobiont</kwd>
        <kwd>lichen</kwd>
        <kwd>metabarcoding</kwd>
        <kwd>
          <italic>
            <tp:taxon-name>
              <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Symbiochloris">Symbiochloris</tp:taxon-name-part>
            </tp:taxon-name>
          </italic>
        </kwd>
        <kwd>ultramafites</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
    <notes>
      <sec sec-type="Citation" id="sec1">
        <title>Citation</title>
        <p>Caboň M, Slovák M, Svitok M, Steinová J, Fačkovcová Z, Gužiková J, Kučera J, Paoli L, Větrovský T, Hindáková A, Senko D, Zozomová-Lihová J, Melichárková A, Gajdošová Z, Guttová A (2026) Ultramafic specialist lichens persist through flexible symbioses structured by climate-driven filtering and modulated by substrate effects. IMA Fungus 17: e199447. <ext-link xlink:type="simple" ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.3897/imafungus.17.199447">https://doi.org/10.3897/imafungus.17.199447</ext-link></p>
      </sec>
    </notes>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec sec-type="Introduction" id="sec2">
      <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Ultramafic rocks, often exposed within ophiolite complexes originating from obducted oceanic lithosphere, occur as outcrops or sparsely vegetated landforms (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Anacker 2014</xref>) and represent sharply delineated, low-competition edaphic islands (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B90">Rajakaruna 2017</xref>). These habitats present highly stressful conditions due to distinct bioavailable elemental profiles (e.g., toxic levels of Mg, Ni, Cr, Co; limited macronutrients such as N, P, K, and Ca), along with low water-holding capacity, high UV radiation, and heat retention from dark-coloured bedrock. Such factors pose substantial adaptive challenges, often leading to ecological divergence and local adaptation, particularly well documented in plants, where ultramafic substrates have been linked to population differentiation and speciation processes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Anacker et al. 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Armbruster 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B92">Rajakaruna et al. 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Arnold et al. 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Echevarria 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B100">Sianta and Kay 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Konečná et al. 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Kierczak et al. 2021</xref>). In bacteria and other microbial communities, studies have primarily reported shifts in community composition and metal tolerance rather than clear cases of ecological speciation (e.g. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63">Kumar et al. 2023</xref>). Several plant families have become model systems for studying adaptation, constitutive tolerance, evolution, biodiversity, and ecology (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Cacho and Strauss 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B92">Rajakaruna et al. 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B100">Sianta and Kay 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Konečná et al. 2020</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">2022</xref>). Organisms thriving on ultramafic substrates employ diverse adaptive strategies, such as hyperaccumulation or exclusion of toxic elements (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Favero-Longo et al. 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B116">Vithanage et al. 2019</xref>). Physiological adaptation is often supported by cross-kingdom interactions, including mycorrhizal associations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Kazakou et al. 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Doubková et al. 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Jourand et al. 2014</xref>) or rhizobacterial symbioses (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B107">Sujkowska-Rybkowska et al. 2020</xref>). While the ecological importance of ectomycorrhizal fungi has been highlighted (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Branco and Ree 2010</xref>), their diversity may be constrained by high metal concentrations and low Ca/Mg ratios, which inhibit fungal growth (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Kazakou et al. 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B91">Rajakaruna et al. 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Branco et al. 2022</xref>).</p>
      <p>Focusing on symbiotic interactions, lichens represent an intricate system in which fungal partners (mycobionts) associate with photoautotrophic organisms (photobionts) and both are further coupled with diverse microbial communities such as endolichenic yeast-like fungi and dark-septate endophytes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B102">Spribille 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Keller et al. 2024</xref>). Lichen symbioses occurring on extreme edaphic substrates, including metal-rich systems like ultramafites, involve mycobiont–photobiont associations in which photobiont performance may vary under elevated metal concentrations, as demonstrated by experimental work showing that copper tolerance can arise through selection for metal-tolerant photobiont strains (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Bačkor and Váczi 2002</xref>). However, no consistent relationship between substrate chemistry and photobiont diversity at higher taxonomic levels has been observed (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Bačkor and Fahselt 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Bačkor et al. 2010</xref>) and its role in structuring endolichenic fungal communities also remains largely unexplored (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B108">Suryanarayanan and Thirunavukkarasu 2017</xref>). This raises a question: how do such toxic environments influence the diversity of complex symbiotic systems – lichen holobionts integrating mycobionts, photobionts, and associated microbiota (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B111">Tripp et al. 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B102">Spribille 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B80">Mulroy et al. 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B117">Vondrák et al. 2023</xref>)? The composition and diversity of these partners likely play a fundamental role in shaping symbiotic performance, particularly in enhancing edaphic tolerance and nutrient acquisition, and thus contribute to the adaptation and evolution of these complex biological associations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Branco and Ree 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Doubková et al. 2012</xref>). Indeed, lichen mycobionts can associate with various locally available photobionts, which may play a dominant role in structuring symbiotic partnerships (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">Leavitt et al. 2015</xref>). Variation in photobiont identity across environmental gradients (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B73">Medeiros et al. 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B113">Vančurová et al. 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B104">Stanton et al. 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B94">Rolshausen et al. 2023</xref>) suggests that photobiont turnover supports acclimation to extreme conditions. Although lichen-forming fungi are generally thought to associate with photobionts available in the local environment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B105">Steinová et al. 2022</xref>), again it remains unclear whether this pattern holds in ultramafic habitats, where strong edaphic filtering, patchy host distribution, and spatial habitat discontinuity could potentially limit photobiont availability and lead to substrate-associated structuring. To date, published studies have mainly documented the occurrence and level of specialisation of lichen mycobionts to ultramafic substrates (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Favero-Longo et al. 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B80">Mulroy et al. 2022</xref>). Only eight lichen species are known exclusively from ultramafic substrates (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B72">Medeiros et al. 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Favero-Longo et al. 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B80">Mulroy et al. 2022</xref>), yet their role as hosts of potentially distinct symbiotic communities remains essentially unknown (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B92">Rajakaruna et al. 2014</xref>).</p>
      <p>Apart from edaphic conditions, climatic factors such as temperature and precipitation may also influence the symbiotic partners in lichen thalli by shaping photobiont composition and availability, with consequences for community assembly, ecological interactions, and potentially long-term evolutionary dynamics (e.g. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B84">Peksa and Škaloud 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B93">Rodríguez‐Arribas et al. 2023</xref>). Environmental stressors, such as extreme light and climatic conditions, can reduce photobiont fitness, constrain their distribution, and shape lichen symbiotic communities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Beckett et al. 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B85">Peksa et al. 2022</xref>). So it is reasonable to expect that climate also plays a vital role in shaping the diversity, distribution, and survival of ultramafic holobionts. Revealing how climate interacts with edaphic factors is essential not only for understanding the diversity and evolution of ultramafic-associated lichens but also for predicting their response to future environmental changes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B90">Rajakaruna 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Favero-Longo et al. 2018</xref>).</p>
      <p>Studies of lichens in harsh environments such as seasonally arid montane habitats (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Harutyunyan et al. 2008</xref>), subalpine rocky zones (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Fernández-Mendoza et al. 2017</xref>), alpine rock habitats (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B79">Muggia et al. 2016</xref>), or the arid, cold conditions of Antarctica (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B98">Selbmann et al. 2013</xref>) indicate that endolichenic fungi, including black fungi may play important roles in stress tolerance and functioning of complex symbiotic system (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B77">Muggia and Grube 2018</xref>). In plant systems, ultramafic habitats are often associated with strong environmental filtering and spatial structuring of plant communities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B92">Rajakaruna et al. 2014</xref>); however, whether similar processes shape lichen symbioses remains unknown. We therefore investigate whether ultramafic substrates influence the diversity and community composition of lichen symbionts, and whether such habitats promote patterns of ecological filtering or diversification. Although empirical data are still limited, studies in plants and mycorrhizal fungi suggest that ultramafic substrates can promote both ecological filtering and evolutionary diversification (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Anacker 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Crossay et al. 2018</xref>), making similar patterns plausible in lichen symbioses.</p>
      <p>The focal species introduced in this study – the saxicolous lichen <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Solenopsora">Solenopsora</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="liparina">liparina</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Nyl.) Zahlbr. (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Catillariaceae">Catillariaceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>), occurs on ultramafic rocks in the Mediterranean Basin and Central and Western Europe (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1</xref>). These ultramafic complexes, primarily of Jurassic–Cretaceous and Devonian-Permian origin, form a discontinuous belt extending from Great Britain through the Massif Central, the Hercynian Mountains, the Apennines, and the Balkans to Western Asia (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B114">Vaughan and Scarrow 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Dilek and Furnes 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Guttová et al. 2019</xref>). The distribution of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Solenopsora">S.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="liparina">liparina</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> is predominantly associated with the Mediterranean climate zone, while also extending into Atlantic and continental climate regions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Guttová et al. 2019</xref>). The species does not form asexual propagules (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Guttová et al. 2014</xref>) which would allow joint dispersal of all symbiotic partners. Instead, the mycobiont produces sexual spores, which must subsequently associate with compatible photobionts and additional symbionts to initiate thallus formation.</p>
      <fig id="F1">
        <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/imafungus.17.199447.figure1</object-id>
        <object-id content-type="arpha">861CA773-470D-593A-B74A-401DBBFC4A25</object-id>
        <label>Figure 1.</label>
        <caption>
          <p><bold>A</bold> Ultramafic specialist <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Solenopsora">Solenopsora</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="liparina">liparina</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> – placodioid thalli; <bold>B</bold><italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Solenopsora">S.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="liparina">liparina</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> – fruiting bodies (apothecia) and lobes with pruinose tips; <bold>C, D</bold> natural habitats with ultramafic outcrops in Italy, Liguria (<bold>C</bold>) and Bosnia and Herzegovina, Smolin Mts (<bold>D</bold>).</p>
        </caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="imafungus-17-e199447-g001.jpg" id="oo_1753392.jpg">
          <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1753392</uri>
        </graphic>
      </fig>
      <p>Ultramafic ecosystems represent natural laboratories for studying how specific edaphic conditions and climate jointly influence holobiont assembly, yet their role in shaping lichen symbioses across full species’ distributional ranges remains poorly resolved. In this work, we investigate whether and how edaphic and climatic factors shape the distribution of the lichen <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Solenopsora">S.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="liparina">liparina</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, as well as the diversity and community composition of its symbiont partners. Using a comprehensive dataset spanning the full distribution range of the species, we integrate ecological niche modeling within a biogeographical framework to identify climatic drivers of habitat suitability and range limits. This analysis is applied in the context of ultramafic specialisation, with calcicolous congeners included as ecological reference taxa representing a natural ecological contrast in substrate-associated conditions ranging from ultramafic to calcareous environments. In parallel, metabarcoding data are used to assess how climatic variability and the spatial discontinuity of ultramafic habitats are associated with the variation in photobiont and endolichenic fungal communities. Overall, these approaches provide a multi-symbiont perspective on how environmental gradients and substrate context relate to patterns of symbiotic assembly across scales. We hypothesize that symbiont diversity and community composition are associated with climatic conditions and substrate-related ecological context, with substrate effects expressed through lineage-level associations among host systems. We further ask whether climatic conditions and substrate-associated host context are reflected in consistent but potentially overlapping patterns of symbiont turnover across analytical frameworks.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="materials|methods" id="sec3">
      <title>Materials and methods</title>
      <sec sec-type="Analytical workflow" id="sec4">
        <title>Analytical workflow</title>
        <p>Our approach (Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">1</xref>: fig. S1) combines ecological and genetic data, linking respective analyses. Pre-processed and quality-controlled ecological data related to the focal species <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Solenopsora">S.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="liparina">liparina</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and two sister congeners, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Solenopsora">S.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="candicans">candicans</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Dicks.) Steiner and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Solenopsora">S.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="cesatii">cesatii</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (A. Massal.) Zahlbr., confined to calcareous rocks, were incorporated into climatic niche models, including assessments of climatic suitability and potential distribution patterns, to test whether climatic conditions shape the composition of lichen-associated assemblages. We established a phylogenetic framework for the mycobiont of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Solenopsora">S.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="liparina">liparina</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> by generating multilocus Sanger sequence data to infer the evolutionary relationships relative to its calcicolous congeners. The dataset included newly generated multilocus sequences of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Solenopsora">S.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="liparina">liparina</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, while sequences of calcicolous congeners (cf. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Guttová et al. 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Fačkovcová et al. 2020</xref>) were retrieved from GenBank. Molecular data (Sanger sequences and metagenomic data) related to the photobionts and endolichenic fungi associated with <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Solenopsora">S.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="liparina">liparina</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> were generated and analysed to establish taxonomic identities, reconstruct phylogenetic relationships (of photobionts), identify functional groups, and explore diversity, community composition, and indicator lineages in relation to climatic context. The outputs enable an ecological inference at both the holobiont level and the level of individual components of the lichen.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Ecological niches and climatic drivers of lichen symbiosis" id="sec5">
        <title>Ecological niches and climatic drivers of lichen symbiosis</title>
        <p>To provide insight into the relative importance of bioclimatic variables contributing most significantly to the distribution of the ultramafic specialist <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Solenopsora">S.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="liparina">liparina</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, habitat suitability models (<abbrev xlink:title="habitat suitability models">HSMs</abbrev>) were constructed following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B99">Senko et al. (2024)</xref>, based on 24 confirmed occurrences derived from field observations and revised material from 20<sup>th</sup> century (Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S3">3</xref>: table S1). Its climatic requirements were studied in the context of two sister congeners confined to calcareous sedimentary rocks – <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Solenopsora">S.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="candicans">candicans</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Solenopsora">S.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="cesatii">cesatii</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, which show strongly conserved habitat and climate affinities across their ranges (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Fačkovcová et al. 2017</xref>). <abbrev xlink:title="habitat suitability models">HSMs</abbrev> for these species were based on 298 (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Solenopsora">S.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="candicans">candicans</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>) and 117 (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Solenopsora">S.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="cesatii">cesatii</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>) localities, respectively. Models were implemented in MaxEnt v3.4.4 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B106">Steven et al. 2020</xref>) using the cloglog output format with 10 replicate runs. For taxa with more than 100 occurrence records, cross-validation was used as a replication approach, whereas bootstrap resampling was applied for <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Solenopsora">S.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="liparina">liparina</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> with fewer occurrences. Model performance was evaluated by area under curve metric (<abbrev xlink:title="area under curve metric">AUC</abbrev>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Fielding and Bell 1997</xref>).</p>
        <p>We compared the environmental niches of the three lichen species using the kernel‐smoothed framework (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Broennimann et al. 2012</xref>). A computational region corresponding to the distribution range of the three congeners was first defined, with a spatial resolution set to 0°08'. Within this framework, a regular grid of points covering the entire distribution areas of the three congeners was generated. A uniform raster with all cells assigned a value of 1 was created and subsequently converted to a point vector dataset, resulting in a regular network of points across the species’ range. For each point, values of the 19 bioclimatic variables (Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S3">3</xref>: table S2) were extracted from the corresponding raster layers. All spatial analyses were carried out in the GRASS GIS v7 environment (GRASS development team 2016) in Computing Center of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava (Devana supercomputer). Bioclimatic variables were standardized and summarized by principal component analysis (<abbrev xlink:title="principal component analysis">PCA</abbrev>) on the correlation matrix. The first two principal components defined a 300 × 300 grid, each cell representing a unique set of environmental conditions. Lichen species occurrences were binned to cells and converted to densities, which were then smoothed with a Gaussian kernel to reduce the influence of uneven sampling intensity and spatial recording bias for niche overlap (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Broennimann et al. 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Guisan et al. 2012</xref>). Smoothed occurrence densities were visualized in <abbrev xlink:title="principal component analysis">PCA</abbrev> space, and pairwise niche overlap was quantified with Schoener’s D (0 = no overlap, 1 = complete overlap; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B97">Schoener 1968</xref>). The significance of observed D values was evaluated using niche equivalency and niche similarity tests (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B118">Warren et al. 2008</xref>). The equivalency test assessed whether two niches were identical by randomizing species identities within pooled occurrences (1,000 permutations) while preserving sample sizes. We rejected the null when observed D fell below the 5<sup>th</sup> percentile of the null distribution (one‐tailed test). We also conducted the similarity test, which asks whether niches are more similar than expected by chance given the available environmental space. We generated a null distribution by random reallocations within the background and rejected the null when observed D exceeded the 95<sup>th</sup> percentile (one‐tailed test).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Sampling design for genetic data" id="sec6">
        <title>Sampling design for genetic data</title>
        <p>In this study, we included samples from the vast majority of known <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Solenopsora">S.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="liparina">liparina</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> localities. In total, we investigated 32 specimens, originating from 10 populations (2–5 specimens per population; Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2</xref>, Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S3">3</xref>: table S3). The relatively low number of specimens per population reflects its rarity in the given sampling sites. A set of samples (10) of the two congeners, which are restricted to calcareous substrates, was included to gain insight into potential differences among the microbiomes of ultramafic and limestone taxa and exploratory comparison (Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S3">3</xref>: table S3).</p>
        <fig id="F2">
          <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/imafungus.17.199447.figure2</object-id>
          <object-id content-type="arpha">ACB7ADA3-F2D9-5F0B-9F8B-AD41179E1775</object-id>
          <label>Figure 2.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Projection of recent HSM of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Solenopsora">Solenopsora</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="liparina">liparina</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> across its range. Colours indicate the predicted habitat suitability ranging from 0.25 (low suitability) to 1.0 (high suitability). Black dots represent known occurrence records of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Solenopsora">S.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="liparina">liparina</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. Localities from which samples were collected for the molecular analysis are labeled with their population abbreviations (see table S3). Light green shading indicates predicted habitat suitability values &lt; 0.25, which fall below the range represented by the colour scale in the figure legend.</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="imafungus-17-e199447-g002.jpg" id="oo_1753393.jpg">
            <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1753393</uri>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="DNA extraction" id="sec7">
        <title>DNA extraction</title>
        <p>Lichen thalli were physically cleaned of debris and washed with 0.5% NaOCl to sterilize their surfaces and avoid contamination by extrathalline microorganisms (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B77">Muggia and Grube 2018</xref>). Total genomic DNA was extracted from the marginal parts of thalline lobes by a DNeasy® Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) following manufacturer's recommendations. Quality and concentration of DNA were checked by a Qubit 4.0 fluorimeter (ThermoFischer Scientific) and BioSpec-nano spectrophotometer (Shimadzu Biotech). The DNA extracts were used to produce both Sanger sequences as well as short metabarcodes. Sanger sequencing provided high-confidence identification of dominant symbiotic partners for phylogenetic inference, whereas metabarcoding captured the broader holobiont diversity, including low-abundance taxa.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Sanger sequencing" id="sec8">
        <title>Sanger sequencing</title>
        <p>Prior to the profiling of the intrathalline microbiome, the genetic diversity of mycobiont and dominant photobionts was inspected using Sanger sequencing. For this purpose, the internal transcribed spacer (<abbrev xlink:title="internal transcribed spacer">ITS</abbrev>) region (ITS1-5.8S-ITS2) of the nuclear rDNA, the ketosynthase (<abbrev xlink:title="ketosynthase">KS</abbrev>) domain of fungal type I polyketide synthase genes (<abbrev xlink:title="polyketide synthase genes">PKS</abbrev>), and a protein-coding nuclear gene <italic>MCM7</italic> (replication licencing factor) were amplified using fungal specific primers (Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S3">3</xref>: table S4). The protein coding chloroplast <italic>rbcL</italic> gene and nuclear <abbrev xlink:title="internal transcribed spacer">ITS</abbrev> region of predominant photobionts were amplified employing algal specific primers (Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S3">3</xref>: table S4). Amplification of the <abbrev xlink:title="ketosynthase">KS</abbrev> domain and <italic>MCM7</italic> gene was performed on a limited number of samples, as the selected dataset based on preliminary results of variability inferred from the <abbrev xlink:title="internal transcribed spacer">ITS</abbrev> dataset and also spanning the species’ distribution area showed minimal genetic variability. Additionally, sequences for the dominant photobiont could not be obtained for some samples, despite multiple amplification attempts. The sequences are deposited in the GenBank database under accession numbers listed in Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S4">4</xref>: table S15.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Metabarcoding" id="sec9">
        <title>Metabarcoding</title>
        <p>The DNA extracts were used for ITS2 rRNA gene amplicon sequencing. Two consecutive PCR reactions per sample were used, using normal and barcode fusion primers. Primers ITS3 and ITS4 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B119">White et al. 1990</xref>) were used for amplification of the target marker. The quality of the library product was checked using gel electrophoresis. PCR products were purified with the Agencourt Ampure XP system (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA), after which a Qubit 2.0 fluorimeter (Life Technologies, MA, USA) was used to measure the concentration of the purified PCR products. Then, barcode-tagged amplicons from the different samples were mixed in equimolar concentrations. Templating and enrichment for sequencing were performed using the One-Touch 2 and One-Touch ES systems (Life Technologies, USA), with the sequencing of the amplicons performed on the Ion Torrent Personal Genome Machine (<abbrev xlink:title="Ion Torrent Personal Genome Machine">PGM</abbrev>) using the Ion <abbrev xlink:title="Ion Torrent Personal Genome Machine">PGM</abbrev> Hi-Q Sequencing Kit with the Ion 314 Chip v. 2 (Thermo Fisher Scientific®, USA), following the manufacturer‘s instructions.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Phylogenetic inference of the mycobiont" id="sec10">
        <title>Phylogenetic inference of the mycobiont</title>
        <p>To assess the phylogenetic position of the mycobiont <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Solenopsora">S.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="liparina">liparina</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, a concatenated dataset comprising <abbrev xlink:title="internal transcribed spacer">ITS</abbrev>, the <abbrev xlink:title="ketosynthase">KS</abbrev> domain of <abbrev xlink:title="polyketide synthase genes">PKS</abbrev>, and <italic>MCM7</italic> sequences was analysed. The dataset included newly generated Sanger sequences, which were incorporated into the alignment framework established in a previous phylogenetic study of the genus <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Solenopsora">Solenopsora</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Guttová et al. 2014</xref>). All mycobiont sequences were edited and aligned in Geneious Prime v2025.2.1 (Biomatters Ltd., Auckland, New Zealand) using the built-in alignment algorithm, followed by manual inspection and adjustment. The alignment used in the analyses is deposited in Figshare at <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.6084/m9.figshare.31081510">doi: 10.6084/m9.figshare.31081510</ext-link>. The exact boundaries of the 5.8S rRNA gene within the <abbrev xlink:title="internal transcribed spacer">ITS</abbrev> region (i.e., between ITS1 and ITS2) were determined using ITSx (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Bengtsson-Palme et al. 2013</xref>). The optimal partitioning scheme and substitution models for phylogenetic analyses were selected using PartitionFinder v2.1.1 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">Lanfear et al. 2016</xref>) under the greedy search algorithm. The best-fit scheme partitioned the alignment into seven subsets: 1 – (GTR+I+G) ITS1 and ITS2, 2 – (K80+I) 5.8S rRNA gene, 3 – (GTR+I+G) first codon positions of <italic>MCM7</italic> and <abbrev xlink:title="polyketide synthase genes">PKS</abbrev>, 4 – (HKY+I) second codon positions of <italic>MCM7</italic> and <abbrev xlink:title="polyketide synthase genes">PKS</abbrev>, 5 –(HKY+G) third codon position of <italic>MCM7</italic>, 6 – (HKY) third codon position of <abbrev xlink:title="polyketide synthase genes">PKS</abbrev>, and 7 – (K80+I) intron region of <abbrev xlink:title="polyketide synthase genes">PKS</abbrev>. Phylogenetic relationships were inferred using both Bayesian inference (<abbrev xlink:title="Bayesian inference">BI</abbrev>) and maximum likelihood (<abbrev xlink:title="maximum likelihood">ML</abbrev>) approaches. Bayesian analyses were conducted in MrBayes v3.2.7a (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B95">Ronquist and Huelsenbeck 2003</xref>) using a Markov Chain Monte Carlo (<abbrev xlink:title="Markov Chain Monte Carlo">MCMC</abbrev>) approach with four chains run for 10 million generations and sampled every 1,000 generations. Convergence was assessed based on standard diagnostics, and the first 25% of trees were discarded as burn-in prior to constructing a 50% majority-rule consensus tree. Maximum Likelihood analyses were performed using RAxML v8.2.11 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B103">Stamatakis 2014</xref>) under the GTRGAMMA substitution model. Branch support was evaluated using 1,000 bootstrap replicates.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Metabarcoding data processing" id="sec11">
        <title>Metabarcoding data processing</title>
        <p>ITS2 data were used to investigate the lichen microbiome, focusing on endolichenic fungi, predominant and additional photobionts, as well as potential ecological associations with microbiome diversity. Amplicon sequence data were processed using the SEED 2.0.1. pipeline (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B115">Větrovský et al. 2018</xref>). The sequencing outputs were quality-checked, and all sequences with more than 2 mismatches in the primer region, any mismatch in the tag region, or an overall quality Phred score (qm) lower than 25 were discarded. The whole ITS2 region was retrieved using ITSx v. 1.0.11 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Bengtsson-Palme et al. 2013</xref>). For taxonomic analysis, we carried out independent clustering of sequences into Operational Taxonomic Units (<abbrev xlink:title="Operational Taxonomic Units">OTUs</abbrev>) using UPARSE in USEARCH v 11.0.667 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Edgar 2013</xref>), applying a 97% similarity threshold. De novo detected chimeric sequences and low-abundance <abbrev xlink:title="Operational Taxonomic Units">OTUs</abbrev> (those with fewer than 5 sequences) were discarded, yielding 1,047 <abbrev xlink:title="Operational Taxonomic Units">OTUs</abbrev> (comprising 1,600,562 reads). The most abundant sequence from each OTU was retrieved for subsequent taxonomic and functional guild assignments. Metabarcoding data are available in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (<abbrev xlink:title="NCBI Sequence Read Archive">SRA</abbrev>) under submission PRJNA1392552.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Taxonomy and functional guilds assignment" id="sec12">
        <title>Taxonomy and functional guilds assignment</title>
        <p>The most abundant sequence variant of each OTU was BLAST-matched against the UNITE all eukaryotes <abbrev xlink:title="internal transcribed spacer">ITS</abbrev> reference database release 9.0 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B81">Nilsson et al. 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">Kõljalg et al. 2020</xref>). Initial fungal functional guild assignments to <abbrev xlink:title="Operational Taxonomic Units">OTUs</abbrev> were done using the FungalTraits database (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B88">Põlme et al. 2020</xref>). Based on published ecological information and functional trait assignments, <abbrev xlink:title="Operational Taxonomic Units">OTUs</abbrev> belonging to taxa reported as yeasts or yeast-like fungi were retrieved and retained for subsequent analyses as endolichenic yeasts. Identity and species delimitation of the endolichenic fungi and Viridiplantae photobionts were further refined by additional phylogenetic analyses based on expanded datasets with additional NCBI blast and retrievement of referential sequences, altogether with selection of additional referential sequences published in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Gheza et al. (2025)</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B76">Miral et al. (2022)</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B112">Vančurová et al. (2015)</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Cometto et al. (2023)</xref>, and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B73">Medeiros et al. (2021)</xref>. Newly generated photobiont ITS2 sequences obtained by Sanger sequencing were also included in the photobiont dataset. Both datasets (endolichenic fungi and photobionts) were analysed independently and aligned by MAFFT online service (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Katoh et al. 2019</xref>) using Q-INS-i setting and further manually curated in Geneious R10. Curated datasets were uploaded to the CIPRES portal (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B75">Miller et al. 2010</xref>), and Maximum Likelihood phylogenetic analyses were calculated using RAxML-HPC Blackbox under the GTR+Gamma substitution model with 1000 replications. In addition, two further photobiont alignments comprising <abbrev xlink:title="internal transcribed spacer">ITS</abbrev> (ITS1, 5.8S, ITS2) and <italic>rbcL</italic> sequences were analysed using the same maximum likelihood framework, to validate taxonomic assignments inferred from ITS2 data and to assess congruence of phylogenetic placement across independent molecular markers. In the context of photobiont plurality, we follow the terminology according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Dědková et al. (2025)</xref>.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Environmental drivers of biont diversity and community composition" id="sec13">
        <title>Environmental drivers of biont diversity and community composition</title>
        <p>We quantified alpha diversity of photobionts and endolichenic fungi associated with <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Solenopsora">S.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="liparina">liparina</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> using Hill numbers (true diversities) of orders 0 (species richness), 1 (Shannon diversity, i.e., the exponential of Shannon entropy), and 2 (Simpson diversity, i.e., the inverse Simpson index), following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Jost (2006)</xref>. We also summarized community evenness using Hill relative evenness for orders 1 (Shannon evenness) and 2 (Simpson evenness), based on <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Jost (2010)</xref>. Before calculating these metrics, sequence reads for each sample were normalized (rarefied) to match the abundance of the least-read sample. To ensure increased accuracy, sample rarefaction and alpha diversity measures were computed in 10 replications, each with a different set of reads in SEED 2.1.2 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B115">Větrovský et al. 2018</xref>), and subsequently averaged. Multivariate analyses were performed on the dataset transformed to relative read abundances. Community composition was assessed as multivariate variation in species abundance data using PERMANOVA based on Bray-Curtis dissimilarities. Prior to the calculation of relative read abundance for each OTU, all mycobiont reads belonging to <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Solenopsora">Solenopsora</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> were discarded from the analysis, and for the endolichenic fungal dataset, photobiont reads were additionally removed prior to downstream analyses.</p>
        <p>Finally, we investigated environmental drivers of the photobiont and endolichenic fungal variables described above using generalized linear mixed models (<abbrev xlink:title="generalized linear mixed models">GLMMs</abbrev>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Bolker et al. 2009</xref>) and distance-based redundancy analysis (<abbrev xlink:title="distance based redundancy analysis">db-RDAs</abbrev>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">Legendre and Anderson 1999</xref>). Altitude and selected bioclimatic variables were used as environmental predictors, with population included as a random intercept in <abbrev xlink:title="generalized linear mixed models">GLMMs</abbrev> to account for the hierarchical sampling design. Integer-valued richness variables were modeled assuming Poisson errors with a logarithmic link, continuous diversity indices were modeled using Gaussian errors with an identity link, and evenness metrics bounded between 0 and 1 were analysed using beta regression with a logit link (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Ferrari and Cribari-Neto 2004</xref>). Model assumptions and fit were assessed using simulation-based residual diagnostics (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Dunn and Smyth 1996</xref>). The significance of fixed effects was evaluated using likelihood-ratio tests, with the test statistic referred to a χ<sup>2</sup> distribution, for the Poisson models (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B71">McCullagh and Nelder 1989</xref>) and beta models (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Ferrari and Cribari-Neto 2004</xref>). For Gaussian models, we employed F-tests with Satterthwaite-adjusted degrees of freedom (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">Kuznetsova et al. 2017</xref>). To avoid multicollinearity among predictors (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Dormann et al. 2013</xref>), we assessed pairwise correlations and removed one variable from any pair with |r| &gt; 0.7. The final set of predictors comprised altitude and temperature annual range (BIO7), precipitation of wettest month (BIO13), precipitation seasonality (BIO15), precipitation of warmest quarter (BIO18), and precipitation of coldest quarter (BIO19). We first fitted full models including all predictors and then iteratively removed variables with variance inflation factors &gt; 5. Final models were obtained using backward elimination to retain the most parsimonious predictor set (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Crawley 2012</xref>). For <abbrev xlink:title="distance based redundancy analysis">db-RDAs</abbrev>, OTU relative abundances of photobionts and endolichenic fungi were square-root transformed to reduce the influence of dominant taxa (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Clarke et al. 2014</xref>), and Bray–Curtis dissimilarities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Bray and Curtis 1957</xref>) were calculated from transformed community matrices. Environmental variables were fitted as constraining predictors in <abbrev xlink:title="distance based redundancy analysis">db-RDAs</abbrev>, and significance was assessed using permutation tests with 10,000 restricted permutations that respected the hierarchical sampling structure by permuting entire populations while retaining within-population sample structure. The analyses were performed in R v. 4.2.2 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B89">R Core Team 2022</xref>) using the libraries bestNormalize v. 1.9.1 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B87">Peterson 2021</xref>), DHARMa v. 0.4.7 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Hartig 2022</xref>), ecospat v. 4.1.3 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Broennimann et al. 2024</xref>), emmeans v. 2.0.2 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B68">Lenth 2023</xref>), ggplot2 v. 4.0.2 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B120">Wickham 2016</xref>), glmmTMB v. 1.1.5 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Brooks et al. 2017</xref>), indicspecies v. 1.7.12 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">De Cáceres and Legendre 2009</xref>) and vegan v. 2.6.10 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B82">Oksanen et al. 2025</xref>).</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="Results" id="sec14">
      <title>Results</title>
      <sec sec-type="Climatic filtering shapes the ultramafic symbiosis" id="sec15">
        <title>Climatic filtering shapes the ultramafic symbiosis</title>
        <p>Phylogenetic inference using RAxML recovered <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Solenopsora">S.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="liparina">liparina</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> as a well-defined monophyletic taxon. <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Solenopsora">Solenopsora</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="liparina">liparina</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> formed a clade sister to the <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Solenopsora">S.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="candicans">candicans</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Solenopsora">Solenopsora</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sp. 1 lineage, while <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Solenopsora">S.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="cesatii">cesatii</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> was recovered as sister to the clade comprising <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Solenopsora">S.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="liparina">liparina</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Solenopsora">S.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="candicans">candicans</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Solenopsora">Solenopsora</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sp. 1 (Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">1</xref>: fig. S2). Climatic niche modelling of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Solenopsora">S.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="liparina">liparina</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> identified a core area of high suitability (&gt;0.75) concentrated in the northern Mediterranean (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2</xref>), whereas the high suitability for the two congeners <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Solenopsora">S.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="candicans">candicans</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Solenopsora">S.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="cesatii">cesatii</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> is in the Mediterranean-Atlantic and oro-Mediterranean, respectively (Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">1</xref>: figs S3, S4). Precipitation during both the wettest and driest quarters, as well as during the coldest part of the year (Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">1</xref>: figs S5–S7, Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S3">3</xref>: table S5), structured the potential climatic niche of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Solenopsora">S.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="liparina">liparina</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, indicating that the species occupies a restricted climatic envelope defined by moisture availability during periods of physiological activity. Consistent with this pattern, <abbrev xlink:title="principal component analysis">PCA</abbrev> environmental space showed that <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Solenopsora">S.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="liparina">liparina</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> occupies a narrower and partially distinct position relative to its calcicolous congeners (Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">1</xref>: figs S8–S10, Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S3">3</xref>: table S6), primarily along gradients associated with precipitation variables (BIO13, BIO19; Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3</xref>), suggesting a shift toward wetter winter conditions within a broadly overlapping climatic space. This climatic positioning is consistent with MaxEnt variable importance and response curves (Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">1</xref>: figs S5–S10, Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S3">3</xref>: table S5), which identify the precipitation variables, particularly BIO13 and BIO19, as key determinants of habitat suitability in <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Solenopsora">S.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="liparina">liparina</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">1</xref>: figs S5–S7, Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S3">3</xref>: table S5). Niche equivalency and similarity tests indicated no significant niche divergence between <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Solenopsora">S.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="liparina">liparina</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Solenopsora">S.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="candicans">candicans</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> or <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Solenopsora">S.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="cesatii">cesatii</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S3">3</xref>: table S6), with the exception of the comparison between <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Solenopsora">S.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="candicans">candicans</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Solenopsora">S.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="cesatii">cesatii</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> in the equivalency test. The results suggest that not all ultramafic habitats are climatically equivalent for <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Solenopsora">S.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="liparina">liparina</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, with precipitation-related variables further restricting the range of substrate conditions within its substrate-defined niche.</p>
        <fig id="F3">
          <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/imafungus.17.199447.figure3</object-id>
          <object-id content-type="arpha">B468F983-0AF8-5286-B709-4112D7D3AC77</object-id>
          <label>Figure 3.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Climatic space of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Solenopsora">S.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="liparina">liparina</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> in the comparison with the studied congeners. Differences in environmental niches of the three <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Solenopsora">Solenopsora</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> lichen species are shown in principal component space as kernel density maps, with shading proportional to occurrence density. Dashed outlines delimit the available environmental space. The right panel is a <abbrev xlink:title="principal component analysis">PCA</abbrev> plot showing environmental variable loadings on the first two components. Variance explained by each component is given in parentheses. b2 = Mean Diurnal Range, b7 = Temperature Annual Range, b8 = Mean Temperature of Wettest Quarter, b9 = Mean Temperature of Driest Quarter, b13 = Precipitation of Wettest Month, b14 = Precipitation of Driest Month, b15 = Precipitation Seasonality, b18 = Precipitation of Warmest Quarter, b19 = Precipitation of Coldest Quarter.</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="imafungus-17-e199447-g003.jpg" id="oo_1753394.jpg">
            <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1753394</uri>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Symbiochloris-dominated photobiont assemblages exhibit host-associated and climate-structured turnover" id="sec16">
        <title><italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Symbiochloris">Symbiochloris</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>-dominated photobiont assemblages exhibit host-associated and climate-structured turnover</title>
        <p>Metabarcoding data showed that <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Solenopsora">S.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="liparina">liparina</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> thalli were dominated by the mycobiont, with non-mycobiont reads primarily representing <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="phylum" reg="Chlorophyta">Chlorophyta</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> photobionts (all within class <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="class" reg="Trebouxiophyceae">Trebouxiophyceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>) and additional <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="phylum" reg="Ascomycota">Ascomycota</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, whereas other taxonomic groups contributed only marginally to total read abundance (Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">1</xref>: fig. S11). Photobiont assemblages were OTU-rich but strongly uneven (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">4A</xref>). For details on taxonomic assignments of <abbrev xlink:title="Operational Taxonomic Units">OTUs</abbrev>, functional guild composition, and relative read abundance, see Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">1</xref>: fig. S12 and Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S4">4</xref>: tables S7–S13. Within thalli, photobiont assemblages were most often dominated by a single lineage of the genus <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Symbiochloris">Symbiochloris</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> contributing nearly all reads, whereas additional lineages, when present, occurred at low relative abundance, indicating low-frequency co-occurrence rather than balanced multi-lineage symbioses (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">4A</xref>, Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">1</xref>: figs S13, S14, Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S4">4</xref>: tables S13, S17). In the context of calcicolous congeners, the composition of dominant photobionts of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Solenopsora">S.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="liparina">liparina</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> showed a shift, with two <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Symbiochloris">Symbiochloris</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> lineages restricted to <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Solenopsora">S.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="liparina">liparina</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and two linked to calcicolous hosts, while low-abundance lineages were broadly shared among host lichens (Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">1</xref>: fig. S13). This pattern is consistent with the prediction that substrate-related effects can be expressed primarily through shifts in the relative frequency of symbiont lineages rather than complete lineage segregation.</p>
        <fig id="F4">
          <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/imafungus.17.199447.figure4</object-id>
          <object-id content-type="arpha">C7B4C0B8-A12C-535D-8E6A-B8F14B8D68E9</object-id>
          <label>Figure 4.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Relative proportion of reads and total read abundance of <bold>A</bold> photobionts and <bold>B</bold> endolichenic fungi. Y-axis labels indicate <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Solenopsora">Solenopsora</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> species abbreviations: L – <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Solenopsora">S.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="liparina">liparina</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, CES – <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Solenopsora">S.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="cesatii">cesatii</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, CAN – <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Solenopsora">S.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="candicans">candicans</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>.</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="imafungus-17-e199447-g004.jpg" id="oo_1753395.jpg">
            <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1753395</uri>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
        <p>Variation in photobiont community composition was significantly structured by precipitation during the warmest quarter (BIO18), with altitude additionally contributing to observed patterns (Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S4">4</xref>: table S16, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5A</xref>), indicating climate-driven lineage turnover across environmental gradients. Elevated diversity and evenness were rare and occurred only in a subset of the samples from Central European and Atlantic populations, followed by samples from the Apennine Peninsula and Serbia (Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">1</xref>: fig. S13, Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S4">4</xref>: table S17). At the population level, no statistically significant differences were detected for any diversity index (Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">1</xref>: fig. S13). Most of the alpha diversity metrics were largely insensitive to environmental predictors, with only photobiont richness responding to annual temperature range (Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">1</xref>: fig. S15, Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S4">4</xref>: table S16). These results support the prediction that photobiont community composition is primarily structured by climatic gradients, whereas alpha diversity exhibits comparatively weak environmental response.</p>
        <fig id="F5">
          <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/imafungus.17.199447.figure5</object-id>
          <object-id content-type="arpha">69D612B2-36C2-57D0-9611-A439BE5FE535</object-id>
          <label>Figure 5.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Significant relationships between environmental variables and community composition of photobionts (<bold>a</bold>) and endolichenic fungi (<bold>b</bold>) of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Solenopsora">S.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="liparina">liparina</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. Arrows depict fitted environmental vectors and points are species scores for the top 25% best-fitting taxa. Percent variation explained by each axis, pseudo-F statistics, and associated p-values are shown in parentheses. b18 = Precipitation of Warmest Quarter.</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="imafungus-17-e199447-g005.jpg" id="oo_1753396.jpg">
            <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1753396</uri>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
        <p>Phylogenetic reconstructions of photobionts inferred from <italic>rbcL</italic> and <abbrev xlink:title="internal transcribed spacer">ITS</abbrev> (ITS1–5.8S–ITS2) datasets under maximum likelihood frameworks corroborated metabarcoding-derived patterns, revealing diversity within the genus <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Symbiochloris">Symbiochloris</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, including two previously unrecognized clades (Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S2">2</xref>: figs S16–S18). Most Sanger-derived ITS2 sequences corresponded to the most abundant <abbrev xlink:title="Operational Taxonomic Units">OTUs</abbrev> recovered from metabarcoding data, confirming their dominance across samples.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Accessory fungal partners show environmentally structured community composition" id="sec17">
        <title>Accessory fungal partners show environmentally structured community composition</title>
        <p>Endolichenic fungi contributed only a minor fraction of the holobiont diversity. For details on taxonomic assignments, functional guild composition, and relative read abundance, see Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">1</xref>: fig. S12 and Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S3">3</xref>, 4: tables S7–S12, S14. Endolichenic fungi exhibited high diversity and evenness, considerable intra-population variability, and low dominance values (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">4B</xref>, Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S2">2</xref>: fig. S19, Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S4">4</xref>: table S17). Notably, one taxon (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Paracladophialophora">Paracladophialophora</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sp. 1) was consistently shared across all <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Solenopsora">S.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="liparina">liparina</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> samples, while another (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Rhinocladiella">Rhinocladiella</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sp. 8) was shared across all but one sample of the calcicolous congeners. Other endolichenic fungal lineages were broadly distributed across <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Solenopsora">S.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="liparina">liparina</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and its calcicolous congeners, with many lineages shared among host taxa and mostly exhibiting no clear host-specific pattern (Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S2">2</xref>: fig. S20). The environmental predictor BIO18 (precipitation of warmest quarter) explained variation in their community composition but was not associated with any alpha diversity metrics, indicating environmentally driven lineage turnover rather than changes in overall diversity (Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S2">2</xref>: fig. S19, Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S4">4</xref>: table S16, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5B</xref>). These findings suggest that endolichenic fungal community composition varies primarily along climatic gradients, whereas alpha diversity remains comparatively insensitive to environmental variation.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="Discussion" id="sec18">
      <title>Discussion</title>
      <p>Our study reveals distinct patterns of diversity and environmental responsiveness for the studied symbiotic partners of the ultramafic lichen specialist <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Solenopsora">Solenopsora</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="liparina">liparina</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, a well-defined, monophyletic species (cf. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Guttová et al. 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Fačkovcová et al. 2020</xref>; Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">1</xref>: fig. S2). Lichen thalli were typically dominated by a single <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Symbiochloris">Symbiochloris</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> lineage (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">4A</xref>, Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">1</xref>: fig. S14, Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S4">4</xref>: tables S13, S17), consistent with patterns reported in other representatives of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Catillariaceae">Catillariaceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Gheza et al. 2025</xref>), <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Coniocybaceae">Coniocybaceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Lobariaceae">Lobariaceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> or <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Ramalinaceae">Ramalinaceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B96">Sanders and Masumoto 2021</xref>). In addition, low-abundance algal lineages from multiple genera were detected (Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">1</xref>: fig. S14), reflecting photobiont plurality within individual thalli (cf. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Dědková et al. 2025</xref>). Photobiont and endolichenic fungal assemblages were primarily structured by climatic variables, particularly precipitation and, to a lesser extent, altitude (Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S4">4</xref>: table S16, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5A</xref>). This indicates that climatic filtering contributes to structuring the photobiont community (cf. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Dal Grande et al. 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B73">Medeiros et al. 2021</xref>). Because substrate identity was not explicitly included as an independent predictor in the statistical models, any substrate-associated interpretation is based on comparisons among host taxa rather than direct testing. Substrate chemistry appears to influence photobiont associations primarily by shaping the composition of dominant partners, while minor taxa are broadly shared across hosts. Together, these patterns are consistent with a model of mixed host-dependence, in which dominant photobionts may exhibit host- or substrate-linked preferences, whereas minor (less abundant) associates show weaker specificity and broader ecological overlap. Endolichenic fungi appeared to exhibit higher species richness, greater evenness, and higher intra-population variability than photobionts (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">4B</xref>, Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S2">2</xref>: figs S19, S20, Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S4">4</xref>: table S17). Their community composition responds primarily to precipitation patterns, reflecting environmentally driven lineage turnover. Widespread occurrence, combined with the prevalent absence of strong host partitioning, suggests that endolichenic fungal communities can be weakly structured by substrate chemistry but responsive to climatic gradients.</p>
      <sec sec-type="Climatic filtering and selective gradients across interacting lineages" id="sec19">
        <title>Climatic filtering and selective gradients across interacting lineages</title>
        <p>The climatic profile of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Solenopsora">S.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="liparina">liparina</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> demonstrates that substrate specialisation alone does not determine its realized distribution. Precipitation during physiologically critical periods, particularly during the warmest and coldest quarters, emerges as a dominant predictor of lichen occurrence (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Ellis 2019</xref>). This pattern suggests that the joint influence of chronic edaphic stress and recurrent climatic stress may contribute to maintaining traits linked to substrate tolerance, while still allowing ecological sorting among more susceptible symbiotic partners. Among congeners, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Solenopsora">S.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="liparina">liparina</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> exhibits the most consistent precipitation-driven signal in its MaxEnt variable-importance profile, whereas <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Solenopsora">S.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="candicans">candicans</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Solenopsora">S.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="cesatii">cesatii</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> profiles rely more on temperature-related predictors and precipitation seasonality. This contrast suggests that ultramafic specialisation may be associated with a narrower climatic niche relative to calcicolous congeners, as reflected by the stronger dependence of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Solenopsora">S.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="liparina">liparina</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> on precipitation-related variables. Such a pattern is consistent with the ecological filtering imposed by ultramafic substrates, although direct tests of niche evolution and diversification dynamics would be required to assess whether this pattern reflects long-term evolutionary constraints or simply stronger ecological filtering associated with ultramafic habitats. The apparent discrepancy between the low habitat suitability predicted across much of the Central European range of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Solenopsora">S.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="candicans">candicans</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and its observed occurrence is likely attributable to the position of these populations at the climatic margins of the species‘ distribution, where continental climatic conditions coincide with a limited availability of suitable habitats. A previous study (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Fačkovcová et al. 2017</xref>) demonstrated strong niche conservatism in <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Solenopsora">S.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="candicans">candicans</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> across its distribution range, suggesting that populations occurring in Central Europe occupy ecological conditions similar to those in Mediterranean core areas rather than exhibiting niche shifts at the range margin. Consequently, the restricted and fragmented distribution of suitable habitats in Central Europe may explain the persistence of isolated populations despite generally low climatic suitability predicted by broad-scale models.</p>
        <p>The distinct phylogenetic position and long independent evolutionary history of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Solenopsora">S.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="liparina">liparina</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> inferred previously from time-calibrated analyses (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Fačkovcová et al. 2020</xref>) indicate that ultramafic specialisation has been maintained over extended evolutionary timescales. Nevertheless, in this study we do not explicitly test rates of niche evolution or diversification, and therefore any inference regarding evolutionary constraint should be regarded as tentative. This interpretation is also supported by the ecological association of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Solenopsora">S.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="liparina">liparina</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> for habitats characterized by elevated temperatures during the driest quarter, suggesting adaptation to the warmer and drier conditions associated with ultramafic bedrock. Indeed, the darker colour of ultramafic rocks results in higher heat conductivity and greater heat absorption compared to the lighter limestones or dolomites, thus making these habitats more challenging for survival (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Konečná et al. 2020</xref>). Based on our field observations, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Solenopsora">S.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="liparina">liparina</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> frequently occurs at sites receiving partial shading from nearby trees and shrubs, which may locally buffer substrate temperatures and reduce desiccation stress on ultramafic outcrops. At the same time, the ecological optimum of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Solenopsora">S.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="liparina">liparina</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> is also linked to increased winter precipitation, which may help buffer against extreme summer climatic conditions.</p>
        <p>Nonetheless, we presume that the distribution and survival of this ultramafic specialist are also strongly influenced by microclimatic refugia, such as sheltered rock fissures and crevices or deep, moist valleys (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">Kučera et al. 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Fačkovcová et al. 2020</xref>). These microhabitats may buffer harsh environmental conditions and facilitate the persistence of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Solenopsora">S.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="liparina">liparina</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> even in drier, warmer parts of its distribution range. However, this hypothesis requires further comparative investigation of microclimatic conditions at the microscale. Microhabitat refugia, including rock fissures and shaded surfaces, likely play a key bilising role, sustaining symbiotic function in otherwise hostile environments (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Jung and Büdel 2021</xref>). The climate sensitivity of the associated microbiome further indicates that ultramafic lichen holobionts are structured by the combined effects of substrate and climate rather than substrate alone.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Climate- and substrate-responsive lineage turnover in photobionts" id="sec20">
        <title>Climate- and substrate-responsive lineage turnover in photobionts</title>
        <p>Photobiont communities associated with <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Solenopsora">Solenopsora</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="liparina">liparina</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> display clear environmental structuring that varies along gradients of warm-season precipitation and altitude (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5A</xref>). These patterns reflect climate-associated turnover. This, together with extreme thermal properties of ultramafic substrates, likely limit the distribution and survival of entire lichen (cf. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Favero-Longo et al. 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B73">Medeiros et al. 2021</xref>). Photobiont species richness declines with increasing annual temperature range (Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">1</xref>: fig. S15), whereas diversity, evenness, and dominance patterns remain largely insensitive to environmental predictors, indicating stability in abundance structure despite compositional turnover. Together with evidence for shared and putatively host-associated photobiont lineages, these patterns suggest climate-associated turnover in photobiont communities driven by environmental filtering from a broadly distributed pool. Host dependence patterns may appear to vary among lineages rather than reflecting strict host-driven exclusivity.</p>
        <p>The photobiont composition of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Solenopsora">S.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="liparina">liparina</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> compared to calcicolous congeners indicates a shift in major photobionts but sharing of the minor ones (Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">1</xref>: fig. S14). This suggests that substrate chemistry may selectively influence dominant photobionts, while low-abundance lineages remain broadly shared among hosts. However, the observed trend in major photobionts needs to be interpreted with caution due to the small sample size of calcicolous congeners, although samples encompass the ecological breadth of their distribution ranges. Comparable low substrate specificity has been observed in globally distributed lichen species (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B78">Muggia et al. 2014</xref>), emphasizing the general ecological flexibility of photobionts rather than the absence of specialisation. Similarly, certain soil algae and cyanobacteria on mafic and ultramafic substrates have been shown to tolerate high levels of heavy metals, forming similar clades on both metal-rich and unpolluted substrates (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Bačkor et al. 2010</xref>).</p>
        <p>In addition to major <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Symbiochloris">Symbiochloris</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> photobionts, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Solenopsora">S.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="liparina">liparina</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> thalli include a range of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Trebouxia">Trebouxia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> taxa – the most common algal genus in lichens (cf. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Dědková et al. 2025</xref>), reflecting access to a shared pool of generalist photobionts. Photobiont plurality, i.e. the occurrence of multiple photobiont lineages within a single lichen symbiosis, has been shown to decline in climatically stressful environments, often interpreted as functional redundancy and symbiotic flexibility (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B110">Tagirdzhanova et al. 2025</xref>), without compromising host specificity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">Mark et al. 2020</xref>). In contrast, chemically stressful or toxic substrates may maintain or even promote photobiont diversity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Bačkor et al. 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B83">Osyczka et al. 2020</xref>). Alternatively, photobiont plurality may represent a pool of functionally distinct partners, from which the mycobiont selectively associates with the physiologically most efficient lineages, enabling rapid physiological adjustment without genetic change (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Casano et al. 2011</xref>).</p>
        <p>Our data support earlier findings that warm, dry, and climatically variable conditions tend to reduce photobiont plurality and reinforce dominance by well-adapted lineages (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">De Carolis et al. 2022</xref>). Richness negatively correlates with annual temperature range, highlighting the importance of thermal stability. We found no consistent effect of altitude on richness, suggesting that climatic variability rather than elevation per se drives these patterns, while overall photobiont community composition is structured by precipitation and altitude. While lichen hyphae may buffer photobionts from substrate toxicity through metal binding and chelation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Bačkor and Fahselt 2008</xref>), our results indicate that climate is a key driver of photobiont species composition and turnover, whereas substrate-associated differences appear limited to dominant partners when compared with calcicolous congeners. This emphasizes that environmental filtering primarily shapes community composition under suboptimal climatic conditions, while substrate conditions influence which photobiont taxa dominate within those communities. These findings align with previous studies showing that lichen photobionts generally exhibit broad ecological amplitude and functional flexibility across extreme environments, where strong environmental filters govern symbiotic specificity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Bačkor et al. 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Blázquez et al. 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Fernández-Mendoza et al. 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B86">Pérez-Ortega et al. 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Determeyer-Wiedmann et al. 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B83">Osyczka et al. 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">De Carolis et al. 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B69">Li et al. 2024</xref>). Similarly, climatic stress has been shown to reduce intra-thalline plurality and favour dominance by a single lineage (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B84">Peksa and Škaloud 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B109">Škvorová et al. 2022</xref>), consistent with our observations in Eastern Mediterranean ultramafic sites. <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Solenopsora">Solenopsora</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="liparina">liparina</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> associates with multiple phylogenetically distinct photobiont lineages from a broadly distributed pool, with local community composition shaped primarily by climatic conditions.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Moisture-driven assembly of endolichenic fungi" id="sec21">
        <title>Moisture-driven assembly of endolichenic fungi</title>
        <p>Endolichenic fungi show compositional shifts along the warm-season precipitation gradient, consistent with the effect of precipitation of the warmest quarter on community composition. Unlike soil fungal communities structured by geographic separation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Gourmelon et al. 2016</xref>), endolichenic fungal assemblages in <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Solenopsora">S.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="liparina">liparina</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> vary more within than among populations. This pattern reflects high intra-population variability and weak population-level differentiation, suggesting the fine-scale environmental filtering may override dispersal limitation, leading to fine-scale community genetic structuring within thalli, i.e. non-random distribution of genetic variation among co-occurring symbiont lineages.</p>
        <p>Many melanized lineages, including dark septate endophytes in the genera <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Cladophialophora">Cladophialophora</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Rhinocladiella">Rhinocladiella</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, known for extremotolerance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Harutyunyan et al. 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B98">Selbmann et al. 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B79">Muggia et al. 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B101">Smith et al. 2020</xref>), occur across samples of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Solenopsora">S.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="liparina">liparina</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> spanning the precipitation gradient, with their relative abundance varying among samples rather than showing a uniform directional response. This pattern is in line with lineage-specific response to environmental conditions, although direct physiological interpretation remains tentative. Community turnover along this gradient likely reflects differential ecological responses among lineages rather than uniform environmental filtering. In contrast, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Paracladophialophora">Paracladophialophora</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sp. 1 exhibited an interesting distribution pattern, being highly frequent in the ultramafic specialist <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Solenopsora">S.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="liparina">liparina</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> while remaining undetected in the calcicolous congeners. The observation is noteworthy because the genus <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Paracladophialophora">Paracladophialophora</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> belongs to the order <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order" reg="Chaetothyriales">Chaetothyriales</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, which includes numerous melanized fungi frequently associated with stress-tolerant lifestyles and extreme habitats (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Cometto et al. 2023</xref>). However, the limited sampling of calcicolous species precludes a formal assessment of substrate specificity or host preference. Consequently, whether the predominance of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Paracladophialophora">Paracladophialophora</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sp. 1 reflects adaptation to ultramafic-associated conditions, host-related factors, or simply incomplete sampling remains unresolved and warrants further investigation.</p>
        <p>The absence of strong geographic structure combined with climatic sensitivity suggests that endolichenic fungi function as dynamically assembled communities responding to environmental variation. Summer hydration events have been shown to directly influence the carbon balance and physiological performance of primary symbionts, and to create pronounced asymmetries in symbiont activity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B74">Meyer et al. 2024</xref>), suggesting that endolichenic fungi may also be indirectly influenced by moisture-driven dynamics. Accurate inference of guild composition and functional roles further requires careful sequence curation and cross-validation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B77">Muggia and Grube 2018</xref>).</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="Conclusions" id="sec22">
      <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>Ultramafic ecosystems provide natural laboratories for studying adaptation under extreme edaphic stress. In the ultramafic specialist lichen <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Solenopsora">S.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="liparina">liparina</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, symbiotic organisation is shaped by climatic filtering within a specialised edaphic niche, with climate acting as a consistent structuring correlate across symbiont groups. Photobionts and endolichenic fungi exhibit climate-associated compositional turnover. Alpha diversity patterns appear to differ between studied symbiont groups and are generally less responsive than community composition. In our dataset, photobionts show indications of substrate- or host-associated structuring, reflected in differences in the most frequently detected lineages between <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Solenopsora">S.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="liparina">liparina</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and the comparatively limited set of sampled calcicolous congeners, whereas less frequent lineages are shared across host systems. Endolichenic fungi show weaker and less consistent host-associated patterns, suggesting that climate factors may play a larger role in structuring communities across symbiont groups. These findings indicate that persistence in ultramafic environments relies on flexible, compositionally dynamic symbioses rather than highly specific obligate partnerships. Climatic filtering plays an important role in shaping symbiotic composition, suggesting that environmentally responsive partner assembly may contribute to persistence in extreme habitats.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ack>
      <title>Acknowledgement</title>
      <p>We acknowledge all colleagues listed in Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S3">3</xref>: tables S1, S3, as well as the collection curators, for their assistance in obtaining samples for this study. We are grateful to the reviewers, Ian Medeiros, Steve Leavitt and Michael Mulroy, for their valuable comments, which significantly improved the manuscript.</p>
    </ack>
    <ref-list>
      <title>References</title>
      <ref id="B1">
        <mixed-citation>Anacker BL (2014) The nature of serpentine endemism. American Journal of Botany 101(2): 219–224. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3732/ajb.1300349" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1300349</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B2">
        <mixed-citation>Anacker BL, Whittall JB, Goldberg EE et al. (2010) Origins and consequences of serpentine endemism in the Californian flora. Evolution 65(2): 365–376. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01114.x" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01114.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B3">
        <mixed-citation>Armbruster WS (2014) Multiple origins of serpentine-soil endemism explained by preexisting tolerance of open habitats. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 111(42): 14968–14969. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1073/pnas.1417242111" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1417242111</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B4">
        <mixed-citation>Arnold BJ, Lahner B, DaCosta JM et al. (2016) Borrowed alleles and convergence in serpentine adaptation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 113(29): 8320–8325. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1073/pnas.1600405113" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1600405113</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B5">
        <mixed-citation>Bačkor M, Fahselt D (2008) Lichen photobionts and metal toxicity. Symbiosis 46(1): 1–10.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B6">
        <mixed-citation>Bačkor M, Váczi P (2002) Copper tolerance in the lichen photobiont <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Trebouxia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">erici</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="phylum">Chlorophyta</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>). Environmental and Experimental Botany 48(1): 11–20. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/S0098-8472(02)00004-7" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-8472(02)00004-7</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B7">
        <mixed-citation>Bačkor M, Peksa O, Škaloud P et al. (2010) Photobiont diversity in lichens from metal-rich substrata based on ITS rDNA sequences. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 73(4): 603–612. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/j.ecoenv.2009.11.002" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2009.11.002</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B8">
        <mixed-citation>Beckett RP, Minibayeva F, Solhaug KA et al. (2021) Photoprotection in lichens: adaptations of photobionts to high light. Lichenologist 53(1): 21–33. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1017/S0024282920000535" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1017/S0024282920000535</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B9">
        <mixed-citation>Bengtsson-Palme J, Ryberg M, Hartman M et al. (2013) Improved software detection and extraction of ITS1 and ITS2 from ribosomal ITS sequences. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 4(10): 914–919. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/2041-210X.12073" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12073</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B10">
        <mixed-citation>Blázquez M, Hernández-Moreno LS, Gasulla F et al. (2022) The role of photobionts as drivers of diversification in an island radiation of lichen-forming fungi. Frontiers in Microbiology 12: 784182. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3389/fmicb.2021.784182" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.784182</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B11">
        <mixed-citation>Bolker BM, Brooks ME, Clark CJ et al. (2009) Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends in ecology and evolution 24(3): 127–135. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/j.tree.2008.10.008" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2008.10.008</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B12">
        <mixed-citation>Branco S, Ree RH (2010) Serpentine soils do not limit mycorrhizal fungal diversity. PLoS ONE 5(7): e11757. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1371/journal.pone.0011757" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011757</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B13">
        <mixed-citation>Branco S, Schauster A, Liao HL et al. (2022) Mechanisms of stress tolerance and their effects on the ecology and evolution of mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytologist 235(6): 2158–2175. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/nph.18308" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.18308</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B14">
        <mixed-citation>Bray JR, Curtis JT (1957) An ordination of the upland forest communities of southern Wisconsin. Ecological Monographs 27(4): 326–349. <ext-link xlink:href="10.2307/1942268" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.2307/1942268</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B15">
        <mixed-citation>Broennimann O, Fitzpatrick MC, Pearman PB et al. (2012) Measuring ecological niche overlap from occurrence and spatial environmental data. Global Ecology and Biogeography 21(4): 481–497. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/j.1466-8238.2011.00698.x" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2011.00698.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B16">
        <mixed-citation>Broennimann O, Di Cola V, Guisan A (2024) ecospat: Spatial ecology miscellaneous methods. R package version 4.1.1.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B17">
        <mixed-citation>Brooks ME, Kristensen K, van Benthem KJ et al. (2017) glmmTMB balances speed and flexibility among packages for zero-inflated generalized linear mixed modeling. The R Journal 9(2): 378–400. <ext-link xlink:href="10.32614/RJ-2017-066" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2017-066</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B18">
        <mixed-citation>Cacho NI, Strauss SY (2014) Occupation of bare habitats, an evolutionary precursor to soil specialization in plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 111(42): 15132–15137. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1073/pnas.1409242111" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1409242111</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B19">
        <mixed-citation>Casano LM, del Campo EM, García-Breijo FJ et al. (2011) Two <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Trebouxia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> algae with different physiological performances are ever-present in lichen thalli of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Ramalina</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">farinacea</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. Coexistence versus competition? Environmental Microbiology 13(3): 806–818. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02386.x" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02386.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B20">
        <mixed-citation>Clarke KR, Tweedley JR, Valesini FJ (2014) Simple shade plots aid better long-term choices of data pre-treatment in multivariate assemblage studies. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 94(1): 1–16. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1017/S0025315413001227" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315413001227</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B21">
        <mixed-citation>Cometto A, Leavitt SD, Grube M et al. (2023) Tackling fungal diversity in lichen symbioses. Mycological Progres 22: 53. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1007/s11557-023-01901-9" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-023-01901-9</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B22">
        <mixed-citation>Crawley MJ (2012) The R book. John Wiley &amp; Sons.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B23">
        <mixed-citation>Crossay T, Cilia A, Cavaloc Y et al. (2018) Four new species of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Mycological Progress 17: 729–744. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1007/s11557-018-1386-5" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-018-1386-5</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B24">
        <mixed-citation>Dal Grande F, Rolshausen G, Divakar PK et al. (2018) Environment and host identity structure communities of green algal symbionts in lichens. New Phytologist 217(1): 277–289. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/nph.14770" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14770</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B25">
        <mixed-citation>De Cáceres M, Legendre P (2009) Associations between species and groups of sites. Ecology 90(12): 3566–3574. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1890/08-1823.1" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1890/08-1823.1</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B26">
        <mixed-citation>De Carolis R, Cometto A, Moya P et al. (2022) Photobiont diversity in lichen symbioses from extreme environments. Frontiers in Microbiology 13: 809804. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3389/fmicb.2022.809804" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.809804</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B27">
        <mixed-citation>Dědková K, Vančurová L, Muggia L et al. (2025) The plurality of photobionts within single lichen thalli. Symbiosis 95: 35–63. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1007/s13199-025-01036-3" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1007/s13199-025-01036-3</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B28">
        <mixed-citation>Determeyer-Wiedmann N, Sadowsky A, Convey P et al. (2019) Physiological life history strategies of photobionts of lichen species from Antarctic and moderate European habitats in response to stressful conditions. Polar Biology 42: 395–405. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1007/s00300-018-2430-2" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-018-2430-2</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B29">
        <mixed-citation>Dilek Y, Furnes H (2009) Structure and geochemistry of Tethyan ophiolites and their petrogenesis in subduction rollback systems. Lithos 113(1–2): 1–20. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/j.lithos.2009.04.022" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2009.04.022</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B30">
        <mixed-citation>Dormann CF, Elith J, Bacher S et al. (2013) Collinearity: a review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance. Ecography 36(1): 27–46. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07348.x" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07348.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B31">
        <mixed-citation>Doubková P, Suda J, Sudová R (2012) The symbiosis with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi contributes to plant tolerance to serpentine edaphic stress. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 44(1): 56–64. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.09.011" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.09.011</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B32">
        <mixed-citation>Dunn PK, Smyth GK (1996) Randomized quantile residuals. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 5(3): 236–244. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1080/10618600.1996.10474708" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1080/10618600.1996.10474708</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B33">
        <mixed-citation>Echevarria G (2018) Genesis and behaviour of ultramafic soils and consequences for nickel biogeochemistry. In: van der Ent A (Ed.) Agromining: Farming for Metals. Springer International, 135–156. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1007/978-3-319-61899-9_8" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61899-9_8</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B34">
        <mixed-citation>Edgar RC (2013) UPARSE: Highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads. Nature Methods 10: 996–998. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1038/nmeth.2604" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2604</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B35">
        <mixed-citation>Ellis CJ (2019) Climate change, bioclimatic models and the risk to lichen diversity. Diversity 11(4): 54. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3390/d11040054" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3390/d11040054</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B36">
        <mixed-citation>Fačkovcová Z, Senko D, Svitok M et al. (2017) Ecological niche conservatism shapes the distributions of lichens: geographical segregation does not reflect ecological differentiation. Preslia 89(1): 63–85. <ext-link xlink:href="10.23855/preslia.2017.063" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.23855/preslia.2017.063</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B37">
        <mixed-citation>Fačkovcová Z, Slovák M, Vďačný P et al. (2020) Spatio-temporal formation of the genetic diversity in the Mediterranean dwelling lichen during the Neogene and Quaternary epochs. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 144: 106704. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/j.ympev.2019.106704" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2019.106704</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B38">
        <mixed-citation>Favero-Longo SE, Isocrono D, Piervittori R (2004) Lichens and ultramafic rocks: a review. Lichenologist 36(6): 391–404. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1017/S0024282904014215" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1017/S0024282904014215</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B39">
        <mixed-citation>Favero-Longo SE, Matteucci M, Giordani P et al. (2018) Diversity and functional traits of lichens in ultramafic areas. Ecological Research 33: 593–608. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1007/s11284-018-1573-5" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-018-1573-5</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B40">
        <mixed-citation>Fernández-Mendoza F, Domaschke S, García MA et al. (2011) Population structure of mycobionts and photobionts of the widespread lichen <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Cetraria</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">aculeata</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. Molecular Ecology 20(6): 1208–1232. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04993.x" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04993.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B41">
        <mixed-citation>Fernández-Mendoza F, Fleischhacker A, Kopun T et al. (2017) ITS1 metabarcoding highlights low specificity of lichen mycobiomes at a local scale. Molecular Ecology 26(18): 4811–4830. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/mec.14244" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.14244</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B42">
        <mixed-citation>Ferrari S, Cribari-Neto F (2004) Beta regression for modelling rates and proportions. Journal of Applied Statistics 31(7): 799–815. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1080/0266476042000214501" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1080/0266476042000214501</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B43">
        <mixed-citation>Fielding AH, Bell JF (1997) A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environmental Conservation 24: 38–49. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1017/S0376892997000088" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892997000088</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B44">
        <mixed-citation>Gheza G, Malíček J, Vančurová L et al. (2025) The epiphytic leprose <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Leprocaulon</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">enexpectatum</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sp. nov. from Italy and its photosynthetic partner <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Symbiochloris</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. Lichenologist 57(1): 1–12. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1017/S002428292400046X" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1017/S002428292400046X</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B45">
        <mixed-citation>Gourmelon V, Maggia L, Powell JR et al. (2016) Environmental and geographical factors structure soil microbial diversity in New Caledonian ultramafic substrates. PLoS ONE 11(12): e0167405. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1371/journal.pone.0167405" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167405</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B46">
        <mixed-citation>Guisan A, Petitpierre B, Broennimann O et al. (2012) Response to comment on climatic niche shifts are rare among terrestrial plant invaders. Science 338(6104): 193. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1126/science.1226051" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1226051</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B47">
        <mixed-citation>Guttová A, Zozomová-Lihová J, Timdal E et al. (2014) First insight into genetic diversity and relationships of European taxa of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Solenopsora</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 176(2): 203–223. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/boj.12200" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/boj.12200</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B48">
        <mixed-citation>Guttová A, Fačkovcová Z, Martellos S et al. (2019) Ecological specialization of lichen congeners with a strong link to Mediterranean-type climate. Lichenologist 51(1): 75–88. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1017/S0024282918000543" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1017/S0024282918000543</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B49">
        <mixed-citation>Hartig F (2022) DHARMa: Residual diagnostics for hierarchical regression models. R package versopm 0.4.6.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B50">
        <mixed-citation>Harutyunyan S, Muggia L, Grube M (2008) Black fungi in lichens from seasonally arid habitats. Studies in Mycology 61(1): 83–90. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3114/sim.2008.61.08" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3114/sim.2008.61.08</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B51">
        <mixed-citation>Jost L (2006) Entropy and diversity. Oikos 113(2): 363–375. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/j.2006.0030-1299.14714.x" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2006.0030-1299.14714.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B52">
        <mixed-citation>Jost L (2010) The relation between evenness and diversity. Diversity 2(2): 207–232. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3390/d2020207" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3390/d2020207</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B53">
        <mixed-citation>Jourand P, Hannibal L, Majorel C et al. (2014) Ectomycorrhizal <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Pisolithus</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">albus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> inoculation of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Acacia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">spirorbis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Eucalyptus</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">globulus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> grown in ultramafic topsoil enhances plant growth and mineral nutrition while limits metal uptake. Journal of Plant Physiology 171(2): 164–172. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/j.jplph.2013.10.011" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2013.10.011</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B54">
        <mixed-citation>Jung P, Büdel B (2021) Lichens as pioneers on rock surfaces. In Büdel B &amp; Friedl T (Eds.), Life at Rock Surfaces: Challenged by Extreme Light, Temperature and Hydration Fluctuations, 141–160. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1515/9783110646467-005" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110646467-005</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B55">
        <mixed-citation>Katoh K, Rozewicki J, Yamada KD (2019) MAFFT online service: multiple sequence alignment, interactive sequence choice and visualization. Briefings in Bioinformatics 20(4): 1160–1166. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1093/bib/bbx108" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbx108</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B56">
        <mixed-citation>Kazakou E, Dimitrakopoulos PG, Baker AJM et al. (2008) Hypotheses, mechanisms and trade-offs of tolerance and adaptation to serpentine soils: from species to ecosystem level. Biological Reviews 83: 495–508. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/j.1469-185X.2008.00051.x" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.2008.00051.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B57">
        <mixed-citation>Keller V, Calchera A, Otte J et al. (2024) Genomic features of lichen-associated black fungi. IUBMB Life 77(1): e2934. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1002/iub.2934" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1002/iub.2934</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B58">
        <mixed-citation>Kierczak J, Pietranik A, Pędziwiatr A (2021) Ultramafic geoecosystems as a natural source of Ni, Cr and Co to the environment: A review. Science of the Total Environment 755(1): 142620. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142620" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142620</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B59">
        <mixed-citation>Kõljalg U, Nilsson HR, Schigel D et al. (2020) The taxon hypothesis paradigm – On the unambiguous detection and communication of taxa. Microorganisms 8(1): 1910. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3390/microorganisms8121910" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8121910</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B60">
        <mixed-citation>Konečná V, Yant L, Kolář F (2020) The evolutionary genomics of serpentine adaptations. Frontiers in Plant Science 11: 574616. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3389/fpls.2020.574616" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.574616</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B61">
        <mixed-citation>Konečná V, Šustr M, Požárová D et al. (2022) Genomic basis and phenotypic manifestation of (non-)parallel serpentine adaptation in <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Arabidopsis</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">arenosa</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. Evolution 76(10): 2315–2331. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/evo.14593" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.14593</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B62">
        <mixed-citation>Kučera J, Marhold K, Lihová J (2010) <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Cardamine</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">maritima</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> group (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Brassicaceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>) in the amphi-Adriatic area: A hotspot of species diversity revealed by DNA sequences and morphological variation. Taxon 59(1): 148–164. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1002/tax.591015" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.591015</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B63">
        <mixed-citation>Kumar RS, Koner S, Tsai H-C et al. (2023) Deciphering endemic rhizosphere microbiome community’s structure towards the host-derived heavy metals tolerance and plant growth promotion functions in serpentine geo-ecosystem. Journal of Hazardous Materials 452: 131359. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.131359" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.131359</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B64">
        <mixed-citation>Kuznetsova A, Brockhoff PB, Christensen RH (2017) lmerTest package: tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of statistical software 82: 1–26. <ext-link xlink:href="10.18637/jss.v082.i13" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B65">
        <mixed-citation>Lanfear R, Frandsen PB, Wright AM et al. (2016) PartitionFinder 2: new methods for selecting partitioned models of evolution for molecular and morphological phylogenetic analyses. Molecular Biology and Evolution 34(3): 772–773. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1093/molbev/msw260" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msw260</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B66">
        <mixed-citation>Leavitt SD, Kraichak E, Nelsen MP et al. (2015) Fungal specificity and selectivity for algae play a major role in determining lichen partnerships across diverse ecogeographic regions in the lichen-forming family <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Parmeliaceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="phylum">Ascomycota</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>)</italic>. Molecular Ecology 24(14): 3779–3797. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/mec.13271" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.13271</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B67">
        <mixed-citation>Legendre P, Anderson MJ (1999) Distance‐based redundancy analysis: testing multispecies responses in multifactorial ecological experiments. Ecological monographs 69(1): 1–24. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1890/0012-9615(1999)069%5B0001:DBRATM%5D2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9615(1999)069[0001:DBRATM]2.0.CO;2</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B68">
        <mixed-citation>Lenth RV (2023) emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means. R package version 1.8.4-1.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B69">
        <mixed-citation>Li B, Mamuti R, Xiao L et al. (2024) The adaptation of lichen symbiosis to desert saline-alkali stress depends more on their symbiotic algae. Physiologia Plantarum 176(5): e14510. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/ppl.14510" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.14510</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B70">
        <mixed-citation>Mark K, Laanisto L, Bueno GC et al. (2020) Contrasting co-occurrence patterns of photobiont and cystobasidiomycete yeast associated with common epiphytic lichen species. New Phytologist 227(5): 1362–1375. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/nph.16475" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.16475</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B71">
        <mixed-citation>McCullagh P, Nelder JA (1989) Generalized linear models, 2<sup>nd</sup> edn. Chapman and Hall, London. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1201/9780203753736" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203753736</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B72">
        <mixed-citation>Medeiros ID, Fryday AM, Rajakaruna N (2014) Additional lichen records and mineralogical data from metal-contaminated sites in Maine. Rhodora 116(967): 323–347. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3119/13-26" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3119/13-26</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B73">
        <mixed-citation>Medeiros ID, Mazur E, Miadlikowska J et al. (2021) Turnover of lecanoroid mycobionts and their <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Trebouxia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> photobionts along an elevation gradient in Bolivia highlights the role of environment in structuring the lichen symbiosis. Frontiers in Microbiology 12: 774839. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3389/fmicb.2021.774839" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.774839</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B74">
        <mixed-citation>Meyer AR, Koch NM, McDonald T et al. (2024) Symbionts out of sync: Decoupled physiological responses are widespread and ecologically important in lichen associations. Scientific Advances 10(24): eado2783. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1126/sciadv.ado2783" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.ado2783</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B75">
        <mixed-citation>Miller MA, Pfeiffer WT, Schwartz T (2010) Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for Inference of Large Phylogenetic Trees. In 2010 gateway computing environments workshop (GCE). pp. 1–8. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1109/GCE.2010.5676129" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1109/GCE.2010.5676129</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B76">
        <mixed-citation>Miral A, Jargeat P, Mambu L et al. (2022) Microbial community associated with the crustose lichen <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Rhizocarpon</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">geographicum</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (L.) DC. living on oceanic seashore: A large source of diversity revealed by using multiple isolation methods. Environmental Microbiology Reports 14(6): 856–872. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/1758-2229.13105" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-2229.13105</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B77">
        <mixed-citation>Muggia L, Grube M (2018) Fungal diversity in lichens: From extremotolerance to interactions with algae. Life 8(2): 15. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3390/life8020015" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3390/life8020015</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B78">
        <mixed-citation>Muggia L, Pérez-Ortega S, Kopun T et al. (2014) Photobiont selectivity leads to ecological tolerance and evolutionary divergence in a polymorphic complex of lichenized fungi. Annals of Botany 114(3): 463–475. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1093/aob/mcu146" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcu146</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B79">
        <mixed-citation>Muggia L, Fleischhacker A, Kopun T et al. (2016) Extremotolerant fungi from alpine rock lichens and their phylogenetic relationship. Fungal Diversity 76: 119–142. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1007/s13225-015-0343-8" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-015-0343-8</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B80">
        <mixed-citation>Mulroy M, Fryday AM, Gersoff A et al. (2022) Lichens of ultramafic substrates in North America: a review. Botany 100(8): 593–617. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1139/cjb-2021-0187" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1139/cjb-2021-0187</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B81">
        <mixed-citation>Nilsson RH, Larsson K-H, Taylor AFS et al. (2019) The UNITE database for molecular identification of fungi: Handling dark taxa and parallel taxonomic classifications. Nucleic Acids Research 47(D1): 259–264. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1093/nar/gky1022" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky1022</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B82">
        <mixed-citation>Oksanen J, Simpson G, Blanchet F et al. (2025) vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.6-10.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B83">
        <mixed-citation>Osyczka P, Lenart-Boroń A, Boroń P et al. (2020) Lichen-forming fungi in postindustrial habitats involve alternative photobionts. Mycologia 113(1): 43–55. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1080/00275514.2020.1813486" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1080/00275514.2020.1813486</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B84">
        <mixed-citation>Peksa O, Škaloud P (2011) Do photobionts influence the ecology of lichens? A case study of environmental preferences in symbiotic green alga <italic>Asterochloris (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="class">Trebouxiophyceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>)</italic>. Molecular Ecology 20(18): 3936–3948. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05168.x" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05168.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B85">
        <mixed-citation>Peksa O, Gebouská T, Škvorová Š et al. (2022) The guilds in green algal lichens – an insight into the life of terrestrial symbiotic communities. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 98(2): fiac008. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1093/femsec/fiac008" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiac008</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B86">
        <mixed-citation>Pérez-Ortega S, Ortiz-Álvarez R, Green TGA et al. (2012) Lichen myco- and photobiont diversity and their relationships at the edge of life (McMurdo Dry Valleys, Antarctica). FEMS Microbiology Ecology 82(2): 429–448. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/j.1574-6941.2012.01422.x" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2012.01422.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B87">
        <mixed-citation>Peterson RA (2021) Finding optimal normalizing transformations via bestNormalize. The R Journal 13(1): 310–329. <ext-link xlink:href="10.32614/RJ-2021-041" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2021-041</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B88">
        <mixed-citation>Põlme S, Abarenkov K, Nilsson RH et al. (2020) FungalTraits: A user-friendly traits database of fungi and fungus-like stramenopiles. Fungal Diversity 105: 1–16. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1007/s13225-020-00466-2" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-020-00466-2</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B89">
        <mixed-citation>R Core Team (2022) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B90">
        <mixed-citation>Rajakaruna N (2017) Lessons on evolution from the study of edaphic specialization. Botanical Review 84: 39–78. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1007/s12229-017-9193-2" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1007/s12229-017-9193-2</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B91">
        <mixed-citation>Rajakaruna N, Harris TB, Alexander EB (2009) Serpentine geoecology of eastern North America: A review. Rhodora 111(945): 21–108. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3119/07-23.1" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3119/07-23.1</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B92">
        <mixed-citation>Rajakaruna N, Boyd RS, Harris TB (2014) Synthesis and future directions: What have harsh environments taught us about ecology, evolution, conservation and restoration? In: Rajakaruna N, Boyd RS, Harris TB (Eds) Plant Ecology and Evolution in Harsh Environments. Nova Science Publishers, 393–409.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B93">
        <mixed-citation>Rodríguez-Arribas C, Martínez I, Aragón G et al. (2023) Specialization patterns in symbiotic associations: A community perspective over spatial scales. Ecology and Evolution 13(7): e10296. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1002/ece3.10296" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10296</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B94">
        <mixed-citation>Rolshausen G, Dal Grande F, Otte J et al. (2023) Lichen holobionts show compositional structure along elevation. Molecular Ecology 32(23): 6619–6630. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/mec.16471" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.16471</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B95">
        <mixed-citation>Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP (2003) MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19(12): 1572–1574. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B96">
        <mixed-citation>Sanders WB, Masumoto H (2021) Lichen algae: the photosynthetic partners in lichen symbioses. Lichenologist 53(5): 347-393. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1017/S0024282921000335" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1017/S0024282921000335</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B97">
        <mixed-citation>Schoener TW (1968) The <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Anolis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> lizards of <italic>Bimini</italic>: Resource partitioning in a complex fauna. Ecology 49: 704–726. <ext-link xlink:href="10.2307/1935534" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.2307/1935534</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B98">
        <mixed-citation>Selbmann L, Grube M, Onofri S et al. (2013) Antarctic epilithic lichens as niches for black meristematic fungi. Biology 2: 784–797. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3390/biology2020784" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3390/biology2020784</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B99">
        <mixed-citation>Senko D, Svitok M, Slovák M et al. (2024) Organisms with high dispersal ability as a proxy for biogeographical characterisation of the Mediterranean biome. Global Ecology and Conservation 56: e03268. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/j.gecco.2024.e03268" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2024.e03268</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B100">
        <mixed-citation>Sianta SA, Kay KM (2019) Adaptation and divergence in edaphic specialists and generalists: Serpentine soil endemics in the California flora occur in barer serpentine habitats with lower soil calcium levels than serpentine tolerators. American Journal of Botany 106(5): 690–703. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1002/ajb2.1285" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1002/ajb2.1285</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B101">
        <mixed-citation>Smith HB, Dal Grande F, Muggia L et al. (2020) Megagenomic data reveal diverse fungal and algal communities associated with the lichen symbiosis. Symbiosis 82: 133–147. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1007/s13199-020-00699-4" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1007/s13199-020-00699-4</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B102">
        <mixed-citation>Spribille T (2018) Relative symbiont input and the lichen symbiotic outcome. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 44: 57–63. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/j.pbi.2018.02.007" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2018.02.007</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B103">
        <mixed-citation>Stamatakis A (2014) RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and postanalysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30(9): 1312–1313. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B104">
        <mixed-citation>Stanton DE, Ormond A, Koch NM et al. (2022) Lichen ecophysiology in a changing climate. American Journal of Botany 110(2): e16131. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1002/ajb2.16131" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1002/ajb2.16131</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B105">
        <mixed-citation>Steinová J, Holien H, Košuthová A et al. (2022) An exception to the rule? Could photobiont identity be a better predictor of lichen phenotype than mycobiont identity? Journal of Fungi 8(3): 275. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3390/jof8030275" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8030275</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B106">
        <mixed-citation>Steven JP, Dudík M, Schapire RE (2020) Maxent Software for Modeling Species Niches and Distributions (Version 3.4.1). <ext-link xlink:href="http://biodiversityinformatics.amnh.org/open_source/maxent/" ext-link-type="uri">http://biodiversityinformatics.amnh.org/open_source/maxent/</ext-link> [accessed on 2 February 2023]</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B107">
        <mixed-citation>Sujkowska-Rybkowska M, Kasowska D, Gediga K et al. (2020) <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Lotus</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">corniculatus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>–rhizobia symbiosis under Ni, Co and Cr stress on ultramafic soil. Plant and Soil 451: 459–484. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1007/s11104-020-04546-9" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-020-04546-9</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B108">
        <mixed-citation>Suryanarayanan TS, Thirunavukkarasu N (2017) Endolichenic fungi: the lesser known fungal associates of lichens. Mycology 8(3): 189–196. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1080/21501203.2017.1352048" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1080/21501203.2017.1352048</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B109">
        <mixed-citation>Škvorová Z, Černajová I, Steinová J et al. (2022) Promiscuity in lichens follows clear rules: Partner switching in <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Cladonia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> is regulated by climatic factors and soil chemistry. Frontiers in Microbiology 12: 781585. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3389/fmicb.2021.781585" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.781585</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B110">
        <mixed-citation>Tagirdzhanova G, Scharnagl K, Sahu N et al. (2025) Complexity of the lichen symbiosis revealed by metagenome and transcriptome analysis of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Xanthoria</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">parietina</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. Current Biology 35(4): 799–817.e5. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/j.cub.2024.12.041" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2024.12.041</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B111">
        <mixed-citation>Tripp EA, Zhang N, Schneider H et al. (2017) Reshaping Darwin’s tree: Impact of the symbiome. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 32(8): 552–555. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/j.tree.2017.05.002" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2017.05.002</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B112">
        <mixed-citation>Vančurová L, Peksa O, Němcová Y et al. (2015) <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Vulcanochloris</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Trebouxiales</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="class">Trebouxiophyceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>), a new genus of lichen photobiont from La Palma, Canary Islands, Spain. Phytotaxa 219(2): 118–132. <ext-link xlink:href="10.11646/phytotaxa.219.2.2" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.219.2.2</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B113">
        <mixed-citation>Vančurová L, Malíček J, Steinová J et al. (2021) Choosing the right life partner: Ecological drivers of lichen symbiosis. Frontiers in Microbiology 12: 769304. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3389/fmicb.2021.769304" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.769304</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B114">
        <mixed-citation>Vaughan APM, Scarrow JH (2003) Ophiolite obduction pulses as a proxy indicator of superplume events? Earth and Planetary Science Letters 213(3–4): 407–416. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/S0012-821X(03)00330-3" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-821X(03)00330-3</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B115">
        <mixed-citation>Větrovský T, Baldrian P, Morais D (2018) SEED 2: A user-friendly platform for amplicon high-throughput sequencing data analyses. Bioinformatics 34(13): 2292–2294. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1093/bioinformatics/bty071" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bty071</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B116">
        <mixed-citation>Vithanage M, Kumarathilaka P, Oze C et al. (2019) Occurrence and cycling of trace elements in ultramafic soils and their impacts on human health: A critical review. Environment International 131: 104974. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/j.envint.2019.104974" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.104974</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B117">
        <mixed-citation>Vondrák J, Svoboda S, Zíbarová L et al. (2023) Alcobiosis, an algal–fungal association on the threshold of lichenisation. Scientific Reports 13: 2957. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1038/s41598-023-29384-4" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-29384-4</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B118">
        <mixed-citation>Warren DL, Glor RE, Turelli M (2008) Environmental niche equivalency versus conservatism: Quantitative approaches to niche evolution. Evolution 62(11): 2868–2883. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00482.x" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00482.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B119">
        <mixed-citation>White TJ, Bruns T, Lee SJWT et al. (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ et al. (Eds) PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, USA, 315–322. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/B978-0-12-372180-8.50042-1" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-372180-8.50042-1</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B120">
        <mixed-citation>Wickham H (2016) ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer-Verlag, New York. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4_9" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4_9</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
    <sec sec-type="Additional information" id="sec23">
      <title>Additional information</title>
      <sec sec-type="Conflict of interest" id="sec24">
        <title>Conflict of interest</title>
        <p>The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Ethical statement" id="sec25">
        <title>Ethical statement</title>
        <p>No ethical statement was reported.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Artificial Intelligence (AI) use" id="sec26">
        <title>Artificial Intelligence (AI) use</title>
        <p>The authors accept full responsibility for the content of the manuscript, including the disclosure of any use of AI.</p>
        <p>No AI tools were used in the preparation of this manuscript.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Adherence to national and international regulations" id="sec27">
        <title>Adherence to national and international regulations</title>
        <p>All the fungal strains used in this study have been legally obtained, respecting the Convention on Biological Diversity (Rio Convention).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Funding" id="sec28">
        <title>Funding</title>
        <p>This study was funded by VEGA 2/0046/25 awarded to ZF and by the Slovak Research and Development Agency (grant numbers: APVV-24-0473 awarded to MC, APVV-22-0365 awarded to MS).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Author contributions" id="sec29">
        <title>Author contributions</title>
        <p>Miroslav Caboň (Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Data curation, Formal analysis, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review &amp; editing), Marek Slovák (Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review &amp; editing), Marek Svitok (Methodology, Validation, Formal analysis, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review &amp; editing), Jana Steinová (Methodology, Formal analysis, Writing – review &amp; editing), Zuzana Fačkovcová (Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Formal analysis, Data acquisition, Visualization, Writing – review &amp; editing), Jaroslava Gužiková (Investigation, Writing – review &amp; editing), Jaromír Kučera (Investigation, Writing – review &amp; editing), Luca Paoli (Investigation, Writing – review &amp; editing), Tomáš Větrovský (Software, Validation), Alica Hindáková (Investigation, Writing – review &amp; editing), Dušan Senko (Methodology, Writing – review &amp; editing), Judita Zozomová-Lihová (Investigation, Writing – review &amp; editing), Andrea Melichárková (Investigation, Writing – review &amp; editing), Zuzana Gajdošová (Investigation, Writing – review &amp; editing), Anna Guttová (Conceptualization, Investigation, Data curation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review &amp; editing, Supervision)</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Author ORCIDs" id="sec30">
        <title>Author ORCIDs</title>
        <p>M. Caboň <ext-link xlink:href="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2255-3816" ext-link-type="uri">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2255-3816</ext-link></p>
        <p>M. Slovák <ext-link xlink:href="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9917-3099" ext-link-type="uri">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9917-3099</ext-link></p>
        <p>M. Svitok <ext-link xlink:href="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2710-8102" ext-link-type="uri">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2710-8102</ext-link></p>
        <p>J. Steinová <ext-link xlink:href="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0229-4535" ext-link-type="uri">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0229-4535</ext-link></p>
        <p>Z. Fačkovcová <ext-link xlink:href="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5760-5364" ext-link-type="uri">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5760-5364</ext-link></p>
        <p>J. Kučera <ext-link xlink:href="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9983-7630" ext-link-type="uri">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9983-7630</ext-link></p>
        <p>L. Paoli <ext-link xlink:href="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5479-6428" ext-link-type="uri">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5479-6428</ext-link></p>
        <p>T. Větrovský <ext-link xlink:href="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0831-486X" ext-link-type="uri">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0831-486X</ext-link></p>
        <p>A. Hindáková <ext-link xlink:href="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1445-5236" ext-link-type="uri">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1445-5236</ext-link></p>
        <p>D. Senko <ext-link xlink:href="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0630-043X" ext-link-type="uri">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0630-043X</ext-link></p>
        <p>J. Zozomová-Lihová <ext-link xlink:href="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8950-6643" ext-link-type="uri">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8950-6643</ext-link></p>
        <p>A. Melichárková <ext-link xlink:href="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4986-3774" ext-link-type="uri">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4986-3774</ext-link></p>
        <p>Z. Gajdošová <ext-link xlink:href="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1395-1070" ext-link-type="uri">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1395-1070</ext-link></p>
        <p>A. Guttová <ext-link xlink:href="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9394-1077" ext-link-type="uri">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9394-1077</ext-link></p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Data availability" id="sec31">
        <title>Data availability</title>
        <p>Newly generated sequences are deposited in the GenBank database under accession numbers listed in Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S4">4</xref>: table S15. Metabarcoding data are deposited in NCBI <abbrev xlink:title="NCBI Sequence Read Archive">SRA</abbrev> PRJNA1392552. All sequence alignments are deposited in Figshare at [<ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.6084/m9.figshare.31081510">doi: 10.6084/m9.figshare.31081510</ext-link>]. All associated information is available in the Suppl. materials.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="supplementary-material">
      <title>Supplementary materials</title>
      <supplementary-material id="S1" position="float" orientation="portrait" xlink:type="simple">
        <object-id content-type="arpha">6E353139-C45B-53FE-9CBE-94A5690C4C60</object-id>
        <label>Supplementary material 1</label>
        <caption>
          <p>Additional figures S1–S15</p>
        </caption>
        <statement content-type="dataType">
          <label>Data type</label>
          <p>docx</p>
        </statement>
        <media xlink:href="imafungus-17-e199447-s001.docx" mimetype="application" mime-subtype="vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document" position="float" orientation="portrait" id="oo_1753397.docx">
          <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/file/1753397</uri>
        </media>
        <permissions>
          <license>
            <license-p>This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/">http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/</ext-link>). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.</license-p>
          </license>
        </permissions>
        <attrib specific-use="authors"> Miroslav Caboň, Marek Slovák, Marek Svitok, Jana Steinová, Zuzana Fačkovcová, Jaroslava Gužiková, Jaromír Kučera, Luca Paoli, Tomáš Větrovský, Alica Hindáková, Dušan Senko, Judita Zozomová-Lihová, Andrea Melichárková, Zuzana Gajdošová, Anna Guttová</attrib>
      </supplementary-material>
      <supplementary-material id="S2" position="float" orientation="portrait" xlink:type="simple">
        <object-id content-type="arpha">B9BB1FD7-1197-53D4-9F59-8912B142BA8C</object-id>
        <label>Supplementary material 2</label>
        <caption>
          <p>Additional figures S16–S20</p>
        </caption>
        <statement content-type="dataType">
          <label>Data type</label>
          <p>zip</p>
        </statement>
        <media xlink:href="imafungus-17-e199447-s002.7z" mimetype="application" mime-subtype="x-7z-compressed" position="float" orientation="portrait" id="oo_1753398.7z">
          <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/file/1753398</uri>
        </media>
        <permissions>
          <license>
            <license-p>This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/">http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/</ext-link>). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.</license-p>
          </license>
        </permissions>
        <attrib specific-use="authors"> Miroslav Caboň, Marek Slovák, Marek Svitok, Jana Steinová, Zuzana Fačkovcová, Jaroslava Gužiková, Jaromír Kučera, Luca Paoli, Tomáš Větrovský, Alica Hindáková, Dušan Senko, Judita Zozomová-Lihová, Andrea Melichárková, Zuzana Gajdošová, Anna Guttová</attrib>
      </supplementary-material>
      <supplementary-material id="S3" position="float" orientation="portrait" xlink:type="simple">
        <object-id content-type="arpha">2051612E-8ECB-502C-86F1-2F3F11069274</object-id>
        <label>Supplementary material 3</label>
        <caption>
          <p>Additional tables S1–S9</p>
        </caption>
        <statement content-type="dataType">
          <label>Data type</label>
          <p>docx</p>
        </statement>
        <media xlink:href="imafungus-17-e199447-s003.docx" mimetype="application" mime-subtype="vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document" position="float" orientation="portrait" id="oo_1753399.docx">
          <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/file/1753399</uri>
        </media>
        <permissions>
          <license>
            <license-p>This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/">http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/</ext-link>). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.</license-p>
          </license>
        </permissions>
        <attrib specific-use="authors"> Miroslav Caboň, Marek Slovák, Marek Svitok, Jana Steinová, Zuzana Fačkovcová, Jaroslava Gužiková, Jaromír Kučera, Luca Paoli, Tomáš Větrovský, Alica Hindáková, Dušan Senko, Judita Zozomová-Lihová, Andrea Melichárková, Zuzana Gajdošová, Anna Guttová</attrib>
      </supplementary-material>
      <supplementary-material id="S4" position="float" orientation="portrait" xlink:type="simple">
        <object-id content-type="arpha">25DE97FD-7AAE-5A7D-8F6F-D45BDDEE3CC3</object-id>
        <label>Supplementary material 4</label>
        <caption>
          <p>Additional tables S10–S17</p>
        </caption>
        <statement content-type="dataType">
          <label>Data type</label>
          <p>xlsx</p>
        </statement>
        <media xlink:href="imafungus-17-e199447-s004.xlsx" mimetype="application" mime-subtype="vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet" position="float" orientation="portrait" id="oo_1753400.xlsx">
          <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/file/1753400</uri>
        </media>
        <permissions>
          <license>
            <license-p>This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/">http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/</ext-link>). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.</license-p>
          </license>
        </permissions>
        <attrib specific-use="authors"> Miroslav Caboň, Marek Slovák, Marek Svitok, Jana Steinová, Zuzana Fačkovcová, Jaroslava Gužiková, Jaromír Kučera, Luca Paoli, Tomáš Větrovský, Alica Hindáková, Dušan Senko, Judita Zozomová-Lihová, Andrea Melichárková, Zuzana Gajdošová, Anna Guttová</attrib>
      </supplementary-material>
      <supplementary-material id="S5" position="float" orientation="portrait" xlink:type="simple">
        <object-id content-type="arpha">6B289E20-3CFD-5A75-9D6D-B7A6FEE18515</object-id>
        <label>Supplementary material 5</label>
        <caption>
          <p>Captions for the additional figures and tables</p>
        </caption>
        <statement content-type="dataType">
          <label>Data type</label>
          <p>docx</p>
        </statement>
        <media xlink:href="imafungus-17-e199447-s005.docx" mimetype="application" mime-subtype="vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document" position="float" orientation="portrait" id="oo_1753401.docx">
          <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/file/1753401</uri>
        </media>
        <permissions>
          <license>
            <license-p>This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/">http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/</ext-link>). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.</license-p>
          </license>
        </permissions>
        <attrib specific-use="authors"> Miroslav Caboň, Marek Slovák, Marek Svitok, Jana Steinová, Zuzana Fačkovcová, Jaroslava Gužiková, Jaromír Kučera, Luca Paoli, Tomáš Větrovský, Alica Hindáková, Dušan Senko, Judita Zozomová-Lihová, Andrea Melichárková, Zuzana Gajdošová, Anna Guttová</attrib>
      </supplementary-material>
    </sec>
  </back>
</article>
