<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//TaxonX//DTD Taxonomic Treatment Publishing DTD v0 20100105//EN" "https://imafungus.pensoft.net/nlm/tax-treatment-NS0.dtd">
<article xmlns:tp="http://www.plazi.org/taxpub" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" article-type="research-article" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">132</journal-id>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="index">urn:lsid:arphahub.com:pub:6d16bb82-189e-56df-a05d-907690ec8db9</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title xml:lang="en">IMA Fungus</journal-title>
        <abbrev-journal-title xml:lang="en">imafungus</abbrev-journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="ppub">2210-6340</issn>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2210-6359</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Pensoft Publishers</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3897/imafungus.17.201932</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">201932</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
          <subject>Research Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="biological_taxon">
          <subject>Other Fungi</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="scientific_subject">
          <subject>DNA barcoding</subject>
          <subject>Genomics</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="geographical_area">
          <subject>World</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Short-read genome skimming enables molecular barcoding of old myxomycete collections</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group content-type="authors">
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Leontyev</surname>
            <given-names>Dmytro V.</given-names>
          </name>
          <email xlink:type="simple">alwisiamorula@gmail.com</email>
          <uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4122-1091</uri>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A2">2</xref>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/">Conceptualization</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing - original draft</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/">Funding acquisition</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/">Investigation</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/">Visualization</role>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Schnittler</surname>
            <given-names>Martin</given-names>
          </name>
          <uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0909-5627</uri>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A2">2</xref>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing - review and editing</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/">Supervision</role>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Shchepin</surname>
            <given-names>Oleg N.</given-names>
          </name>
          <uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9327-7655</uri>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A2">2</xref>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing - review and editing</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/">Data curation</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/">Investigation</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/">Supervision</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/">Visualization</role>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="A1">
        <label>1</label>
        <addr-line content-type="verbatim">H.S. Skovoroda Kharkiv National Pedagogical University, Alchevskikh 29, Kharkiv 61002, Ukraine</addr-line>
        <institution>H.S. Skovoroda Kharkiv National Pedagogical University</institution>
        <addr-line content-type="city">Kharkiv</addr-line>
        <country>Ukraine</country>
        <uri content-type="ror">https://ror.org/00gjv5s24</uri>
      </aff>
      <aff id="A2">
        <label>2</label>
        <addr-line content-type="verbatim">Institute of Botany and Landscape Ecology, University Greifswald, Soldmannstr. 15, Greifswald D-17487, Germany</addr-line>
        <institution>Institute of Botany and Landscape Ecology, University Greifswald</institution>
        <addr-line content-type="city">Greifswald</addr-line>
        <country>Germany</country>
        <uri content-type="ror">https://ror.org/00r1edq15</uri>
      </aff>
      <author-notes>
        <fn fn-type="corresp">
          <p>Corresponding author: Dmytro V. Leontyev (<email xlink:type="simple">alwisiamorula@gmail.com</email>)</p>
        </fn>
        <fn fn-type="edited-by">
          <p>Academic editor: Marco Thines</p>
        </fn>
      </author-notes>
      <pub-date pub-type="collection">
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>03</day>
        <month>09</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>17</volume>
      <elocation-id>e201932</elocation-id>
      <uri content-type="arpha" xlink:href="http://openbiodiv.net/BC0FBDE0-8036-500F-B857-82EC08AD3C19">BC0FBDE0-8036-500F-B857-82EC08AD3C19</uri>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received">
          <day>31</day>
          <month>05</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted">
          <day>10</day>
          <month>08</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Dmytro V. Leontyev, Martin Schnittler, Oleg N. Shchepin</copyright-statement>
        <license license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple">
          <license-p>This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <abstract>
        <label>Abstract</label>
        <p>This study evaluates the effectiveness of Illumina-based genome skimming for barcoding myxomycete herbarium collections ranging from 29 to 91 years in age. We successfully retrieved partial sequences of the standard marker gene (nucSSU) in all cases, as well as additional markers (mtSSU, EF1a, and COI) for certain collections. Altogether, 28 genes were recognized in the studied material. In a 33-year-old specimen of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Lindbladia">Lindbladia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="tubulina">tubulina</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, the assembly reached an N50 of 4.19 kb, enabling the recovery of extended functional loci. The input genomic DNA quantity emerges as the primary determinant of sequencing success. Samples with high DNA yields provide representative amounts of contigs coming confirmedly (matching sequences in the NCBI nucleotide database) or potentially (no-hit fraction) from myxomycetes, regardless of specimen age. In addition to target DNA, we revealed distinct signals of both anthropogenic contamination (human DNA and skin microflora) and natural substrate inhabitants, including oribatid mites and bacteria from dead wood, soil, and grass litter. Thus, even in old collections, metagenomic data still carry information regarding the substrate upon which the myxomycete developed. The results demonstrate that short-read genome skimming may help to integrate historical type material of myxomycetes into contemporary phylogenetic research. This method overcomes the length-dependent limitations of traditional Sanger sequencing, thus providing a roadmap for the future of museomics in myxomycetology.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <label>Key words:</label>
        <kwd>
          <italic>
            <tp:taxon-name>
              <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="phylum" reg="Amoebozoa">Amoebozoa</tp:taxon-name-part>
            </tp:taxon-name>
          </italic>
        </kwd>
        <kwd>bioinformatics</kwd>
        <kwd>DNA degradation</kwd>
        <kwd>herbarium genomics</kwd>
        <kwd>metagenomics</kwd>
        <kwd>next-generation sequencing</kwd>
        <kwd>nucSSU</kwd>
        <kwd>old DNA</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
    <notes>
      <sec sec-type="Citation" id="sec1">
        <title>Citation</title>
        <p>Leontyev DV, Schnittler M, Shchepin ON (2026) Short-read genome skimming enables molecular barcoding of old myxomycete collections. IMA Fungus 17: e201932. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3897/imafungus.17.201932" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3897/imafungus.17.201932</ext-link></p>
      </sec>
    </notes>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec sec-type="Introduction" id="sec2">
      <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Nomenclatural types serve as the foundation of biological systematics: every scientific name is ultimately anchored to a specific physical specimen preserved in a collection (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Turland et al. 2018</xref>). Many discussions regarding diagnostic features, intraspecific variability, taxonomic boundaries, and phylogenetic relationships among species can potentially be resolved by reference to the type. The splitting of a single polymorphic species into several new ones must also rely on the type specimen; otherwise, it remains unclear which of the new species should retain the historical name (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Winston 1999</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Singh 2019</xref>). The loss or destruction of a type creates obstacles for any taxonomic revision, engendering nomenclatural uncertainty and forcing authors to interpret names arbitrarily.</p>
      <p>With taxonomy entering the molecular era, DNA barcoding has become a major tool for species identification and delimitation. However, alongside new opportunities, this methodology has revealed a serious limitation: type specimens collected in the distant past cannot be analysed using routine methods applied to fresh material. Specifically, for <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="class" reg="Myxomycetes">Myxomycetes</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>—a group of terrestrial protists with collectible fungus-like fructifications (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Stephenson et al. 2008</xref>), the conventional age threshold for Sanger sequencing-based barcoding is typically estimated at 10–15 (20) years (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Leontyev et al. 2015</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">2026</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Schnittler et al. 2017</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Janik et al. 2020</xref>). This problem creates a fundamental gap between historical names, linked to non-barcoded types, and molecular data from contemporary collections (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Leontyev et al. 2019a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Ronikier et al. 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Prikhodko et al. 2023</xref>). Without matching to type material, large datasets of thoroughly studied contemporary specimens cannot be reliably identified. This situation presents a major challenge, as approximately 85% of known myxomycete species were described before 2000 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Schnittler et al. 2025</xref>), leaving their type specimens unbarcodable by standard methods.</p>
      <p>However, advances in paleogenetics have demonstrated that DNA is a relatively stable molecule, capable of persisting for hundreds of thousands of years (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Pääbo 1989</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Kjær et al. 2022</xref>). In this context, the rapid decline in sequencing success observed for myxomycetes appears paradoxical. The explanation lies in the fact that the obstacle to barcoding old collections is not the total destruction of DNA, but its fragmentation following cell death (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Pääbo et al. 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Burrell et al. 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Brewer et al. 2019</xref>). If the genome is fragmented into segments shorter than the target marker locus, its PCR amplification coupled with classical Sanger sequencing becomes technically impossible, even if the specimen still contains a significant amount of DNA (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Bakker and Hemerik 2023</xref>). Based on this rationale, many authors have already turned to next-generation sequencing methods, specifically the Illumina platform, which produces millions to billions of short nucleotide sequence reads. The results have been impressive: it has been shown that even a specimen age of 150–200 years is not a limit for successful molecular barcoding of plants and fungi stored in herbaria (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Bakker 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Shumskaya et al. 2023</xref>). Natural history collections have proven to be a “repository of dead DNA”, a vast archive of genomic data that can be used for taxonomic, population, evolutionary, and ecological studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Burrell et al. 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Bieker and Martin 2018</xref>). Consequently, the concept of museomics has emerged, encompassing the analysis of nucleic acid and protein molecules in museum collections (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Guschanski et al. 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Raxworthy and Smith 2021</xref>).</p>
      <p>Probably the most relevant and cost-effective approach for working with old specimens is genome skimming. This method is based on low-coverage random sequencing of total DNA, aiming not for full nuclear genome reconstruction, but rather for “skimming off” high-copy regions such as ribosomal and mitochondrial markers. Due to their multi-copy nature, these markers are represented in libraries significantly more frequently than single-copy nuclear genes, allowing for reliable molecular barcoding even with extremely low DNA yields (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Straub et al. 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Zeng et al. 2018</xref>).</p>
      <p>In the present study, we attempted to evaluate the feasibility of barcoding myxomycete herbarium collections ranging from 29 to 91 years in age using Illumina-based genome skimming. We aimed to test the effectiveness of this method for obtaining reliable genetic data from specimens with varying degrees of preservation and diverse DNA concentrations.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="methods" id="sec3">
      <title>Methods</title>
      <sec sec-type="Material selection" id="sec4">
        <title>Material selection</title>
        <p>The study material consisted of seven myxomycete specimens from various taxonomic groups, collected by R. Hagelstein, T.E. Brooks, I. Ammirati, R. McHugh, S.L. Stephenson, Y.K. Novozhilov, and M. Schnittler (see Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1</xref>) and currently housed in the herbarium of the Institute of Botany and Landscape Ecology at the University of Greifswald, Germany (Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">1</xref>: Sheet A). The specimens were selected to represent an age gradient, with collection dates ranging from 1935 to 1997. Initially, eight specimens were selected; however, one was found to be completely devoid of DNA for unclear reasons and was excluded from the study. Our analysis of this particular specimen is detailed in a separate publication (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Leontyev and Schnittler 2025</xref>). The selected specimens differed significantly in size and number of fruiting bodies, but all contained friable, uniformly coloured spore masses and lacked visible contamination by fungi or arthropods. Around 1 mm<sup>3</sup> of spores were sampled from each specimen; the total spore count was not normalized.</p>
        <table-wrap id="T1" position="float" orientation="portrait">
          <label>Table 1.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Sequencing data for the herbarium collections used in this study.</p>
          </caption>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Species</bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>
                    <italic>
                      <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Fuligo">Fuligo</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="cinerea">cinerea</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>
                    </italic>
                  </bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>
                    <italic>
                      <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Trichia">Trichia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="scabra">scabra</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>
                    </italic>
                  </bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>
                    <italic>
                      <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Lindbladia">Lindbladia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="tubulina">tubulina</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>
                    </italic>
                  </bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>
                    <italic>
                      <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Cribraria">Cribraria</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="mirabilis">mirabilis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>
                    </italic>
                  </bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>
                    <italic>
                      <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Lycogala">Lycogala</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="epidendrum">epidendrum</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>
                    </italic>
                  </bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>
                    <italic>
                      <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Lindbladia">Lindbladia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="tubulina">tubulina</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>
                    </italic>
                  </bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>
                    <italic>
                      <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Lycogala">Lycogala</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="epidendrum">epidendrum</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>
                    </italic>
                  </bold>
                </th>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Species ID</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">sc11445</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">sc11426</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">sc12075</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">sc10428</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">UARK25089</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">sc2833</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">sc11299</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Age of collection, years</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">91</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">64</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">51</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">47</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">41</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">33</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">29</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">DNA concentration before WGA, ng/μL</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.55</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">4.53</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">2.61</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1.85</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1.73</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">8.57</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">4.24</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">DNA concentration after WGA, ng/μL</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">5.07</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">9.14</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">4.51</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">2.76</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">4.94</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">DNA amount used for sequencing, ng</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">365</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">158</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">658</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">325</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">199</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">300</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">356</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Total sequence length, Mbp</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1532.1</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1670.7</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1133.9</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1463.4</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1425.4</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">2353.5</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1516.7</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Total assembly length, Mbp</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">11.1</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">162</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">9.1</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">2.6</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1.7</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">84.1</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">16.8</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">No-hit fraction length, Mbp</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">5.1</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">108</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">4.7</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">2</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1.4</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">82.3</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">16.6</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"><italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="class" reg="Eumycetozoa">Eumycetozoa</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> fraction length, kbp</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1.5</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">49.7</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.4</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.2</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.5</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">111</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">5.1</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"><italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="class" reg="Eumycetozoa">Eumycetozoa</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> contigs count</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">6</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">17</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">2</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">2</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">19</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">11</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">No-hit &amp; <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="class" reg="Eumycetozoa">Eumycetozoa</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> N50, bp</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">251</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">266</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">214</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">207</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">208</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">4190</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">243</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">No-hit &amp; <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="class" reg="Eumycetozoa">Eumycetozoa</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> longest contig, kbp</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">8.2</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">41.6</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">4.1</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1.81</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1.63</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">114</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">4.7</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">No-hit &amp; <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="class" reg="Eumycetozoa">Eumycetozoa</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> mean GC content, %</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">50.5</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">53.7</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">35.7</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">37.1</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">32.8</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">37.9</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">35.7</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Interpretation of dominant contaminants</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Decomposition microbiota: Saprophytic bacteria typical of long-term decay.</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Forest substrate: Decaying wood microflora and photosynthetic cyanobacteria.</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Mixed noise: indoor dust, mammalian DNA, and forest mesofauna (mites).</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Indoor dust: fungal and bacterial microflora of residential areas.</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Indoor dust: skin microflora and associated dermatophytic fungi.</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Soil microbiota: predominantly nitrogen-fixing soil bacteria.</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Anthropogenic noise: trace human DNA and typical skin microflora.</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="DNA library preparation and sequencing" id="sec5">
        <title>DNA library preparation and sequencing</title>
        <p>Following the recommendations of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Shumskaya et al. (2023)</xref>, we extracted DNA from the specimens using the filter-based QIAamp DNA Micro Kit (Qiagen, Germany), following the “Isolation of Genomic DNA from Tissues” protocol supplied by the manufacturer. A key feature of this kit is the presence of carrier RNA, i.e. polyA molecules that non-specifically bind short DNA fragments, preventing them from passing through the filter pores. For each sample, 50 µL of DNA solution were obtained. The concentration of the resulting product was measured using a DeNovix DS-11 FX fluorometer (DeNovix Inc. USA) following the TN 143 Broad Range Assay Detailed Protocol (DeNovix Inc. USA). After concentration measurement, the samples were divided in two groups. The first group, where the extracted DNA amount reached 150 ng (sc11426 and sc2833), was directly used for sequencing. For the second group (the rest of the samples, with the lower amounts of DNA), a 2.5 µL aliquot was taken for whole-genome amplification (WGA) using the 4BB TruePrime WGA Kit (4basebio, UK). The amplification process was conducted for 6 hours. Then, 35 µL of genomic DNA solution (first group) or 72 µL of WGA products (second group) with final amount of DNA ranging from 158 to 658 ng (see Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1</xref>), were sent to Eurofins Genomics (Germany) for genome skimming on the Illumina NovaSeq (USA) platform, using the WGS <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="kingdom" reg="Bacteria">Bacteria</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>/Yeast/<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="kingdom" reg="Fungi">Fungi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> protocol with a sequencing depth of 5 million read pairs (2x 150 bp) per sample.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Bioinformatic processing" id="sec6">
        <title>Bioinformatic processing</title>
        <p>The demultiplexed, adapter-trimmed paired-end Illumina sequencing data were screened for quality and presence of remaining adapter sequences using FastQC v0.11.9 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Andrews 2010</xref>). To obtain a high sensitivity of detection of low-abundance genomic signal expected from old DNA samples, the reads were assembled <italic>de novo</italic> using a metagenomic assembler metaSPAdes v4.0.0 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Nurk et al. 2017</xref>), which is equivalent to running SPAdes with the “--meta” flag. No prior quality-based read trimming or filtering was done before the assembly. The assemblies were run on the High-Performance Computing cluster of the University of Greifswald. For the sample <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Lindbladia">Lindbladia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="tubulina">tubulina</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sc2833, which had the highest input DNA amount and the largest sequencing data volume, this assembly method failed with an out-of-memory error. Therefore, the assembly for this sample was made using the standard assembly mode of SPAdes v4.0.0 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Prjibelski et al. 2020</xref>).</p>
        <p>For taxonomic profiling of contigs, each resulting assembly was searched against a locally installed NCBI nucleotide database (“core_nt”, updated 31 Jan 2026) using BLASTn v. 2.5.0+ in megablast mode (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Camacho et al. 2009</xref>). BLAST output was generated in tabular format (“outfmt 6”) including subject TaxIDs, and these TaxIDs were linked to the NCBI taxonomy using the NCBI “taxdump” files.</p>
        <p>To estimate per-contig sequencing depth, the original reads of each sample were mapped back to the corresponding assembly using strobealign v. 0.17.0 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Sahlin 2022</xref>). Alignment output (SAM, Sequence Alignment Map) was converted to sorted and indexed BAM (Binary Alignment Map) files using samtools v. 1.12 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Danecek et al. 2021</xref>). Taxonomic assignments, GC content, contig length, and read depth were integrated and visualized with BlobToolKit v. 4.5.0 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Challis et al. 2020</xref>). For each sample, BlobTools2 was used to create a project from the assembly FASTA, BLAST hits, and BAM coverage file, and summary snail and blob plots were produced to assess the distribution of contigs and read support across inferred taxonomic groups at different taxonomic levels.</p>
        <p>For every contig where the BLAST search over a local core_nt database found a match to an organism belonging to <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="class" reg="Eumycetozoa">Eumycetozoa</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, we additionally conducted a thorough online BLAST search over the NCBI GenBank Nucleotide database (see Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">1</xref>: Sheet B for a list of the best 10 matches with the smallest e-values and Sheet C for a list of genes found).</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="Results" id="sec7">
      <title>Results</title>
      <sec sec-type="Identification of the target genome fragments" id="sec8">
        <title>Identification of the target genome fragments</title>
        <p>For all seven samples, we obtained a substantial volume of raw genetic data. The total sequence length was relatively uniform, ranging from 1134 to 2354 Mbp (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1</xref>). However, the total length of the assembled contigs varied by two orders of magnitude, ranging from 1.7 Mbp in <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Lycogala">L.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="epidendrum">epidendrum</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sc25089 to 162.0 Mbp in <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Trichia">T.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="scabra">scabra</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sc11426. Compared to the genome size of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Badhamia">Badhamia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="polycephala">polycephala</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Miller et al. 2021</xref>), this corresponds to an estimated genome coverage between 0.7% and 65%.</p>
        <p>Visualization of the assemblies via blob plots (<ext-link xlink:href="10.5281/zenodo.20467237" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20467237</ext-link>) demonstrates significant differences in the data structure between samples. In each specimen, there were a number of contigs (1–19) unambiguously classified as belonging to <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="class" reg="Eumycetozoa">Eumycetozoa</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> based on BLAST hits (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1</xref>, Tables <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">2</xref>). However, most sequences within the resulting assemblies belonged to the no-hit fraction—sequences with no matches in the NCBI database. We hypothesize (see Discussion) that a substantial proportion of this fraction is composed of myxomycete genetic material, which remains unidentified because genomic data for myxomycetes are still extremely sparse (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Takano et al. 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Schaap et al. 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Kang et al. 2017</xref>). In the sample <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Lindbladia">Lindbladia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="tubulina">tubulina</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sc2833 (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1A, C</xref>), the no-hit fraction accounted for 82.3 Mbp and had a unimodal GC content distribution with highest contig density within a 35% to 45% range and a predominant base coverage of 20–40×, matching those of the contigs identified as fragments of myxomycete nuclear genome. In <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Lycogala">Lycogala</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="epidendrum">epidendrum</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> UARK25089 (<ext-link xlink:href="10.5281/zenodo.20467237" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20467237</ext-link>), the no-hit fraction was smaller (1.4 Mbp) but maintained a characteristic distribution profile, allowing its identification as a residual signal of the nuclear genome. In <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Trichia">Trichia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="scabra">scabra</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sc11426 (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1B, D</xref>), the no-hit contig fraction had a bimodal GC content distribution, with the second peak at around 68%, suggesting heavy contamination by prokaryotic DNA. In samples with low input DNA amount and high fragmentation, such as <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Cribraria">Cribraria</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="mirabilis">mirabilis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sc10428 and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Fuligo">Fuligo</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="cinerea">cinerea</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sc11445 (<ext-link xlink:href="10.5281/zenodo.20467237" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20467237</ext-link>), the data were represented by a sparse cloud of short contigs with a broad unimodal GC content distribution and the base coverage peaking around one.</p>
        <fig id="F1">
          <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/imafungus.17.201932.figure1</object-id>
          <object-id content-type="arpha">1CA59694-E786-506C-AAB4-54E677669B5B</object-id>
          <label>Figure 1.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Blob plot summary for assembled contigs of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Lindbladia">Lindbladia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="tubulina">tubulina</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sc2833, 33 years old (<bold>A, C</bold>) and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Trichia">Trichia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="scabra">scabra</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sc11426, 64 years old (<bold>B, D</bold>). Axes: base coverage (logarithmic) against GC proportion. Circles are sized in proportion to contig length. Histograms show the distribution of contig length sum along each axis. <bold>A, B</bold>. <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="class" reg="Eumycetozoa">Eumycetozoa</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> contigs shown against no-hit fraction. <bold>C, D</bold>. Leading groups of the sample metagenome at the level of kingdoms are shown.</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="imafungus-17-e201932-g001.jpg" id="oo_1764438.jpg">
            <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1764438</uri>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
        <table-wrap id="T2" position="float" orientation="portrait">
          <label>Table 2.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Molecular identification of old herbarium collections used in the study: a – sequence fragment length (bp); b – base coverage of the fragment (number of reads); c – match according to Nucleotide BLAST (%).</p>
          </caption>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <th rowspan="2" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Specimen ID</bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="2" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Identified taxon (ribogroup)</bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="3">
                  <bold>nucSSU</bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="3">
                  <bold>mtSSU</bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="3">
                  <bold>COI</bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="3">
                  <bold>EF1a</bold>
                </th>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>a</bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>b</bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>c</bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>a</bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>b</bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>c</bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>a</bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>b</bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>c</bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>a</bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>b</bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>c</bold>
                </th>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">sc11445</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <italic>
                    <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Fuligo">Fuligo</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="cinerea">cinerea</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>
                  </italic>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">157</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">4</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">100.0</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="3" colspan="1">sc11426</td>
                <td rowspan="3" colspan="1">
                  <italic>
                    <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Trichia">Trichia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="scabra">scabra</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>
                  </italic>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">2952</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">32</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">99.8</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">41607</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">197</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">100.0</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">507</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">2</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">87.7</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">239</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">99.6</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">226</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">87.9</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">sc12075</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <italic>
                    <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Lindbladia">Lindbladia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="tubulina">tubulina</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>
                  </italic>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">169</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">92.7</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">259</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">88.2</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">sc10428</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <italic>
                    <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Cribraria">Cribraria</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="mirabilis">mirabilis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>
                  </italic>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">220</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">93.0</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">UARK25089</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <italic>
                    <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Lycogala">Lycogala</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="epidendrum">epidendrum</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>
                  </italic>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">318</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">99.7</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">145</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1506</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">100.0</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="3" colspan="1">sc2833</td>
                <td rowspan="3" colspan="1">
                  <italic>
                    <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Lindbladia">Lindbladia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="tubulina">tubulina</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>
                  </italic>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">7755</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">127</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">100.0</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">2310</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">330</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">100.0</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">10830</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">10</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">91.9</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">2106</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">8</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">100.0</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">4847</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">8</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">86.4</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1121</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">127</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">100.0</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="4" colspan="1">sc11299</td>
                <td rowspan="4" colspan="1">
                  <italic>
                    <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Lycogala">Lycogala</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="epidendrum">epidendrum</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>
                  </italic>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1129</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">4</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">99.4</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">620</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">13</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">99.0</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">878</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">34</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">81.6</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">233</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">89.0</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">696</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">3</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">94.0</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">223</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">14</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">94.6</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">381</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">3</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">87.4</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">142</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">46</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">92.9</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">161</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">151</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">100.0</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>In the combined no-hit &amp; <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="class" reg="Eumycetozoa">Eumycetozoa</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> fraction of all samples except <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Lindbladia">L.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="tubulina">tubulina</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sc2833, the N50 values vary between 207–266 bp (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1</xref>, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2</xref>) and the statistical mode of read length distribution varies between 56 and 237 bp. This reflects the dominance of short unresolved fragments in the assembly graph that likely resulted from dead ends, short sequence repeats, rare variants, abundant contaminants, low-coverage sequences or sequencing errors. These short and low-coverage contigs are not filtered out from the results by metaSPAdes. The sample <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Lindbladia">L.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="tubulina">tubulina</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sc2833 stands out, with the N50 reaching 4.19 Kbp, which is likely explained by the higher input DNA amount and the different assembly mode applied to it (standard SPAdes mode – see Methods).</p>
        <fig id="F2">
          <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/imafungus.17.201932.figure2</object-id>
          <object-id content-type="arpha">E62894FF-C36F-5ED4-BB7D-F8DB78C7B4DA</object-id>
          <label>Figure 2.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Snail plot of assembly statistics for <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Lindbladia">Lindbladia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="tubulina">tubulina</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sc2833, 33 years old (<bold>A</bold>), and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Trichia">Trichia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="scabra">scabra</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sc11426, 64 years old (<bold>B</bold>). The dark grey area represents the sequence length distribution, with the radius scaled to the longest sequence (red line, 105k and 13.2k, respectively). Orange and pale-orange arcs indicate N50 and N90 lengths, respectively. The pale grey spiral shows the cumulative sequence count on a logarithmic scale (white lines show orders of magnitude). The outer bands visualize GC (blue), AT (pale-blue), and non-identified bases (white) content distributions, binned consistently with the inner sequence data.</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="imafungus-17-e201932-g002.jpg" id="oo_1764439.jpg">
            <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1764439</uri>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
        <p>Within the examined set of samples, specimen age did not show a statistically significant linear correlation with genomic data quality. The two specimens yielding the highest amounts of DNA (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Lindbladia">L.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="tubulina">tubulina</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sc2833 and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Trichia">T.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="scabra">scabra</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sc11426) span widely different ages (33 and 64 years, respectively) and are not the youngest among the studied collections (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">2</xref>). Similarly, no significant correlation was detected between specimen age and DNA yield, read length, or the number of recovered <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="class" reg="Eumycetozoa">Eumycetozoa</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> contigs across the WGA-treated subset (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3</xref>). While DNA degradation over time is indisputable, these observations suggest that within a timeframe of several decades, initial preservation conditions and sample-specific properties may outweigh chronological age as a limiting factor.</p>
        <fig id="F3">
          <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/imafungus.17.201932.figure3</object-id>
          <object-id content-type="arpha">E412DF79-F5EA-5B74-95A1-87AB3DA2A2F6</object-id>
          <label>Figure 3.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Spearman correlation matrix (<italic>r<sub>s</sub></italic>) between specimen age, DNA concentration, and bioinformatic characteristics of the sequencing data, calculated for five specimens sequenced after WGA. Blue and red colours represent a positive and negative correlation respectively. The size of the circles is proportional to the absolute value of the correlation coefficient <italic>r<sub>s</sub></italic>. Non-significant correlations (<italic>p</italic> &gt; 0.05) are marked with crosses. If the Bonferroni correction is applied, all values are insignificant. The diagram was generated using the PAST software.</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="imafungus-17-e201932-g003.jpg" id="oo_1764440.jpg">
            <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1764440</uri>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="DNA barcodes in genomic assemblies" id="sec9">
        <title>DNA barcodes in genomic assemblies</title>
        <p>Although the detection of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="class" reg="Eumycetozoa">Eumycetozoa</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> within the resulting data remains challenging due to the lack of reference genomes, we succeeded in identifying anchor contigs for all seven specimens that correspond to their preliminary morphological identification (Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S2">2</xref>). Despite the paucity of these fragments, their presence is critical for specimen barcoding—the primary objective of genome skimming for old herbarium collections. It is important to emphasize that for most specimens the identified <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="class" reg="Eumycetozoa">Eumycetozoa</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> markers are localized within the main no-hit cloud (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1</xref>; <ext-link xlink:href="10.5281/zenodo.20467237" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20467237</ext-link>). The Sheet B in the Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">1</xref> lists the ten best BLAST hits for each contig and the detected genes.</p>
        <p>Nuclear small subunit ribosomal gene (nucSSU) sequences were identified for all specimens. Their length varied from 157 to 7755 bp, and base coverage ranged from 1 to 127 copies (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">2</xref>). For six out of seven specimens, the detected fragments of nucSSU at least partially covered the ca. 600 bp fragment (Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S3">3</xref>) conventionally used for DNA barcoding in myxomycetes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Leontyev and Schnittler 2017</xref>).</p>
        <p>The total number of recognized genes reached 28 (Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">1</xref>: Sheet C). Among them, the eukaryotic elongation factor 1-alpha (EF1a) gene was detected in four specimens, with the contig length exceeding 10 kbp in <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Lindbladia">L.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="tubulina">tubulina</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sc2833. For three specimens, contigs containing the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) gene were obtained, varying in length (up to 41 kb) and base coverage (14–1506). Sequences including the mitochondrial small subunit ribosomal gene (mtSSU) were recovered for only two specimens, which also differed in length (up to 2310 bp) and base coverage (13–330). Other identified genes like actin, alpha-tubulin, and several tRNAs have not been studied for bright-spored myxomycetes; consequently, the matches found did not allow for species-level identification, as the closest analogues were dark-spored myxomycetes and dictyostelids (Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">1</xref>: Sheet B).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Analysis of contamination and associated biota" id="sec10">
        <title>Analysis of contamination and associated biota</title>
        <p>Taxonomic interpretation of non-target contigs revealed a complex metagenomic background, the composition of which varies depending on specimen age, substrate conditions, and archival history (<ext-link xlink:href="10.5281/zenodo.20467237" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20467237</ext-link>). The anthropogenic fraction, primarily represented by human DNA, was recorded in all examined specimens. The proportion of this fraction correlates with the total DNA yield: in libraries with low target material content (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Cribraria">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="mirabilis">mirabilis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sc10428, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Lycogala">L.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="epidendrum">epidendrum</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sc25089), anthropogenic noise becomes dominant. In close association with human DNA, a skin microflora complex was identified, including the bacterium <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Cutibacterium">Cutibacterium</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="acnes">acnes</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, representatives of the genus <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Staphylococcus">Staphylococcus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, and lipophilic yeasts of the genus <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Malassezia">Malassezia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. Domestic cattle DNA (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Bos">Bos</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="taurus">taurus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>) found in several samples likely also belongs to the anthropogenic fraction.</p>
        <p>The second metagenomic fraction is conditionally natural, reflecting the substrate inhabitants and ecosystem relationships of the myxomycetes. Arthropod DNA was detected selectively; the most pronounced signal was recorded in specimen <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Lindbladia">L.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="tubulina">tubulina</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sc12075, where oribatid mites of the genus <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subgenus" reg="Oppiella">Oppiella</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, common inhabitants of decaying wood (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Maraun and Scheu 2000</xref>), were identified. The bacterial component of this fraction is represented by organisms characteristic of forest ecosystems: the cyanobacterium <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Nostoc">Nostoc</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and the betaproteobacterium <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Variovorax">Variovorax</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (associates of rotting wood) were noted in specimen <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Trichia">T.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="scabra">scabra</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sc11426, while nitrogen-fixing soil bacteria of the genus <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Bradyrhizobium">Bradyrhizobium</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> dominate in <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Lindbladia">L.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="tubulina">tubulina</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sc2833. In the oldest specimen of the series, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Fuligo">F.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="cinerea">cinerea</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sc11445, a predominance of putrefactive bacteria of the genus <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="Bacillus">Bacillus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> was observed. The archaeal component is limited to nitrifying soil forms (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Nitrososphaera">Nitrososphaera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>). The viral fraction is represented by fragments of bacteriophages.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="Discussion" id="sec11">
      <title>Discussion</title>
      <p>The obtained data demonstrate that genome skimming is an effective method for the molecular identification of myxomycete herbarium specimens, even when the material is of significant age. We successfully extracted at least one of the four markers we searched for (nucSSU, mtSSU, EF1a, COI) from all specimens, including the oldest collection, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Fuligo">Fuligo</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="cinerea">cinerea</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (1935). For six out of the seven specimens, more than one marker was identified.</p>
      <p>The lack of a direct correlation between specimen age and the quality of the resulting data should not be interpreted as an absence of time-dependent DNA degradation. However, it leads to an important conclusion: within the studied timeframe, the informativeness of the assembly does not critically deteriorate solely as a function of chronological age. This suggests that even a specimen age exceeding 100 years is not necessarily an obstacle to genome skimming, as previously demonstrated for vascular plants and fungi (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Bieker and Martin 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Shumskaya et al. 2023</xref>). At the same time, the starting DNA amount is crucial for obtaining high-quality data. Large specimens with a high quantity of spores yielded good results regardless of their age.</p>
      <p>The dominance of the no-hit fraction in all assemblies is likely explained by the critical lack of genomic data for myxomycetes, particularly for the bright-spored group, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Lucisporomycetidae">Lucisporomycetidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Leontyev et al. 2019b</xref>), represented in our study by all specimens except for <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Fuligo">F.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="cinerea">cinerea</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. The correspondence of the GC content and coverage profile of the no-hit fraction with the identified anchor nucSSU contigs allows us to preliminarily consider this fraction as partially belonging to the nuclear genome of the target organism. The consistency of the GC content within the no-hit fractions provides some support for this assumption: since GC content is a group-specific genomic feature (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Hildebrand et al. 2010</xref>), the observed clustering suggests a single taxonomic source. However, this assumption requires further evidence. Given the confounding effects of low coverage, short contig lengths, and potential background noise, we emphasize that the no-hit fraction cannot be assumed to entirely represent the target myxomycete DNA. Moreover, even sequences identified by BLAST as belonging to <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="class" reg="Eumycetozoa">Eumycetozoa</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> may represent the contamination by other myxomycete species. This methodological problem can only be resolved by creating high-quality <italic>de novo</italic> reference genomes using Hi-Fi PacBio and Hi-C technologies for all key groups of myxomycetes. Without such a roadmap, the potential of genome skimming for archival collections will remain limited to a narrow set of standard barcodes.</p>
      <p>A considerable challenge is the high contamination load, which creates noise within the genomic data. Notably, specimens subjected to WGA generally exhibited higher contamination levels and lower yield of target DNA. This issue may be a direct consequence of the WGA process, which preferentially amplifies younger and less-degraded DNA of anthropogenic contaminants rather than the target DNA. Unfortunately, our data are insufficient to fully evaluate the impact of this factor, as the two specimens that did not undergo WGA and yielded more target DNA initially possessed the highest DNA concentrations. Consequently, the suitability of WGA for genome skimming remains an open question.</p>
      <p>Genome skimming has provided insights not only into the target species but also into the ecological context of the specimen. The detection of mite DNA, lignotrophic betaproteobacteria (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Variovorax">Variovorax</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>), and cyanobacteria (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Nostoc">Nostoc</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>) allows for a partial reconstruction of the decaying wood communities at the time of collection. The components of the soil microbiome, such as nitrogen-fixing bacteria (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Bradyrhizobium">Bradyrhizobium</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>) and nitrifying archaea (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Nitrososphaera">Nitrososphaera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>), may as well represent the same ecosystem. A particularly intriguing case is the predominance of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="Bacillus">Bacillus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> spp. in the specimen <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Fuligo">F.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="cinerea">cinerea</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sc11445. This myxomycete typically develops on dead herbaceous substrates, such as rotting straw, where mass development of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="Bacillus">Bacillus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> spp. is frequently observed (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Mandic-Mulec et al. 2015</xref>). Thus, even in a 90-year-old specimen, metagenomic data still carry information regarding the substrate upon which the myxomycete developed. Undoubtedly, a similar study of fresh material could provide a wealth of data on the topical and trophic relationships of myxomycetes, including the composition of the microorganisms on which their plasmodia feed.</p>
      <p>Even in the absence of comprehensive, annotated reference genomes for all myxomycete taxonomic groups, the approach demonstrated here still offers an effective solution for resolving taxonomic uncertainties. Recent studies confirmed the effectiveness of strategies based on genetic distance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Borg Dahl et al. 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Yatsiuk et al. 2025</xref>), branch length (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Leontyev et al. 2026</xref>), and recombination (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Shchepin et al. 2022</xref>) for reliable species delimitation in myxomycetes. Therefore, in cases where a nominal species, such as <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Reticularia">Reticularia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="splendens">splendens</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Trichia">Trichia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="varia">varia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> or <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Tubifera">Tubifera</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="dimorphotheca">dimorphotheca</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Feng and Schnittler 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Leontyev et al. 2025</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">2026</xref>), comprises a complex of a few semi-cryptic biological species, obtaining one or two species-specific barcoding fragments from the type collection could be sufficient to determine which biological species the type belongs to. If a type yields only highly fragmented, low-quantity DNA, the following approach can be employed. By sequencing one modern voucher for each recognized biospecies, researchers can establish a reference set for the barcoding of old collections. The Illumina-based reference library will provide the necessary data to accurately assign the type to its corresponding lineage.</p>
      <p>NGS is not the only alternative for specimen barcoding of old collections with highly fragmented DNA. An alternative approach could be the design of primers specifically for the amplification of short barcode fragments that fall within the length range of old, degraded DNA. The authors have achieved success through this method and will report on it in a follow-up publication.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="Conclusion" id="sec12">
      <title>Conclusion</title>
      <p>The proposed method opens new prospects for the revision of herbarium collections and the construction of a molecular bridge between historical types and modern species concepts. The ability to extract genomic information from almost century-old specimens allows for the integration of myxomycete nomenclatural types, facilitating the entry of myxomycetological research into the era of phylogenomics.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ack>
      <title>Acknowledgements</title>
      <p>This project (1208119) has received funding through the MSCA4Ukraine project, which is funded by the European Union. Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union, the European Research Executive Agency or the MSCA4Ukraine Consortium. Neither the European Union nor the European Research Executive Agency, nor the MSCA4Ukraine Consortium as a whole nor any individual member institutions of the MSCA4Ukraine Consortium can be held responsible for them.</p>
    </ack>
    <ref-list>
      <title>References</title>
      <ref id="B1">
        <mixed-citation>Andrews S (2010) FastQC: A quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B2">
        <mixed-citation>Bakker FT (2017) Herbarium genomics: skimming and plastomics from archival specimens. Webbia 72: 35–45. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1080/00837792.2017.1313383" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1080/00837792.2017.1313383</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B3">
        <mixed-citation>Bakker FT, Hemerik L (2023) Herbarium DNA degradation – Falling to pieces non-randomly. Bauhinia: Zeitschrift der Basler Botanischen Gesellschaft 29: 63–74. <ext-link xlink:href="10.12685/bauhinia.1378" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.12685/bauhinia.1378</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B4">
        <mixed-citation>Bieker VC, Martin MD (2018) Implications and future prospects for evolutionary analyses of DNA in historical herbarium collections. Botany Letters 165: 409–418. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1080/23818107.2018.1458651" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1080/23818107.2018.1458651</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B5">
        <mixed-citation>Borg Dahl M, Brejnrod AD, Unterseher M et al. (2018) Genetic barcoding of dark-spored myxomycetes (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="phylum">Amoebozoa</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>). Identification, evaluation and application of a sequence similarity threshold for species differentiation in NGS studies. Molecular Ecology Resources 18(2): 306–318. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/1755-0998.12725" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12725</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B6">
        <mixed-citation>Brewer GE, Clarkson JJ, Maurin O et al. (2019) Factors affecting targeted sequencing of 353 nuclear genes from herbarium specimens spanning the diversity of angiosperms. Frontiers in Plant Science 10: 1102. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3389/fpls.2019.01102" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01102</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B7">
        <mixed-citation>Burrell AS, Disotell TR, Bergey CM (2015) The use of museum specimens with high-throughput DNA sequencers. Journal of Human Evolution 79: 35–44. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/j.jhevol.2014.10.015" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2014.10.015</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B8">
        <mixed-citation>Camacho C, Coulouris G, Avagyan V et al. (2009) BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics 10: 421. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1186/1471-2105-10-421" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-10-421</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B9">
        <mixed-citation>Challis R, Richards E, Rajan J et al. (2020) BlobToolKit – interactive quality assessment of genome assemblies. G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics 10: 1361–1374. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1534/g3.119.400908" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.119.400908</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B10">
        <mixed-citation>Danecek P, Bonfield JK, Liddle J et al. (2021) Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools. GigaScience 10: giab008. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1093/gigascience/giab008" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giab008</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B11">
        <mixed-citation>Feng Y, Schnittler M (2015) Sex or no sex? Group I introns and independent marker genes reveal the existence of three sexual but reproductively isolated biospecies in <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Trichia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">varia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="class">Myxomycetes</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>). Organisms Diversity &amp; Evolution 15: 631–650. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1007/s13127-015-0230-x" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1007/s13127-015-0230-x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B12">
        <mixed-citation>Guschanski K, Krause J, Sawyer S et al. (2013) Next-generation museomics disentangles one of the largest primate radiations. Systematic Biology 62: 539–554. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1093/sysbio/syt018" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syt018</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B13">
        <mixed-citation>Hildebrand F, Meyer A, Eyre-Walker A (2010) Evidence of selection upon genomic GC-content in <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="kingdom">Bacteria</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>. PLOS Genetics 6: e1001107. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1371/journal.pgen.1001107" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001107</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B14">
        <mixed-citation>Janik P, Ronikier M, Ronikier A (2020) New protocol for successful isolation and amplification of DNA from exiguous fractions of specimens: a tool to overcome the basic obstacle in molecular analyses of myxomycetes. PeerJ 8: e8406. <ext-link xlink:href="10.7717/peerj.8406" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8406</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B15">
        <mixed-citation>Kang S, Tice AK, Spiegel FW et al. (2017) Between a pod and a hard test: the deep evolution of Amoebae. Molecular Biology and Evolution 34: 2258–2270. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1093/molbev/msx162" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msx162</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B16">
        <mixed-citation>Kjær KH, Winther Pedersen M, De Sanctis B et al. (2022) A 2-million-year-old ecosystem in Greenland uncovered by environmental DNA. Nature 612: 283–291. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1038/s41586-022-05453-y" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05453-y</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B17">
        <mixed-citation>Leontyev DV, Schnittler M (2017) The phylogeny of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="class">Myxomycetes</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. In: Stephenson SL, Rojas C (Eds) <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="class">Myxomycetes</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>: biology, systematics, biogeography and ecology. Academic Press, London, 83–106. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/B978-0-12-805089-7.00003-2" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-805089-7.00003-2</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B18">
        <mixed-citation>Leontyev DV, Schnittler M (2025) Not a <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Lycogala</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>? Investigating the holotype of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Lycogala</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">fuscoviolaceum</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. European Journal of Protistology 99: 126151. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/j.ejop.2025.126151" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejop.2025.126151</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B19">
        <mixed-citation>Leontyev DV, Schnittler M, Stephenson SL (2015) A critical revision of the <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Tubifera</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">ferruginosa</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> complex. Mycologia 107: 959–985. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3852/14-271" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3852/14-271</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B20">
        <mixed-citation>Leontyev DV, Lloyd SJ, Moroz EL et al. (2025) Cryptic speciation in <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Reticularia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>: two hardly distinguishable new species from Japan and Tasmania. Fungal Systematics and Evolution 17: 19–29.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B21">
        <mixed-citation>Leontyev DV, Schnittler M, Stephenson SL et al. (2019a) Systematic revision of the <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Tubifera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> casparyi-T. dictyoderma</italic> complex: resurrection of the genus <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Siphoptychium</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and introduction of the new genus <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Thecotubifera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. Mycologia 111: 981–997. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1080/00275514.2019.1660842" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1080/00275514.2019.1660842</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B22">
        <mixed-citation>Leontyev DV, Kochergina AV, Inoue M et al. (2026) A five-finger exercise: five overlooked non-European species of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Tubifera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. Fungal Systematics and Evolution 17: 110–123. <ext-link xlink:href="https://fuse-journal.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/FuseVol17Art7.pdf" ext-link-type="uri">https://fuse-journal.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/FuseVol17Art7.pdf</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B23">
        <mixed-citation>Leontyev DV, Schnittler M, Stephenson SL et al. (2019b) Towards a phylogenetic classification of the <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="class">Myxomycetes</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. Phytotaxa 399: 209–238. <ext-link xlink:href="10.11646/phytotaxa.399.3.5" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.399.3.5</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B24">
        <mixed-citation>Mandic-Mulec I, Stefanic P, Van Elsas JD (2015) Ecology of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Bacillaceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. Microbiology Spectrum 3: TBS-0017-2013. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1128/microbiolspec.TBS-0017-2013" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.TBS-0017-2013</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B25">
        <mixed-citation>Maraun M, Scheu S (2000) The structure of oribatid mite communities (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subclass">Acari</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="suborder">Oribatida</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>): patterns, mechanisms and implications for future research. Ecography 23: 374–382. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/j.1600-0587.2000.tb00294.x" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2000.tb00294.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B26">
        <mixed-citation>Miller D, Padmanabhan R, Sarcar SN (2021) Genomics and gene expression in myxomycetes. In: Stephenson SL, Rojas C (Eds) <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="class">Myxomycetes</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>: Biology, systematics, biogeography and ecology. Academic Press, London, 377–416. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/B978-0-12-824281-0.00001-4" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-824281-0.00001-4</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B27">
        <mixed-citation>Nurk S, Meleshko D, Korobeynikov A et al. (2017) metaSPAdes: A new versatile metagenomic assembler. Genome Research 27: 824–834. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1101/gr.213959.116" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.213959.116</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B28">
        <mixed-citation>Pääbo S (1989) Ancient DNA: extraction, characterization, molecular cloning, and enzymatic amplification. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 86: 1939–1943. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1073/pnas.86.6.1939" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.86.6.1939</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B29">
        <mixed-citation>Pääbo S, Poinar H, Serre D et al. (2004) Genetic analyses from ancient DNA. Annual Review of Genetics 38: 645–679. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1146/annurev.genet.37.110801.143214" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.genet.37.110801.143214</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B30">
        <mixed-citation>Prikhodko IS, Shchepin ON, Bortnikova NA et al. (2023) A three-gene phylogeny supports taxonomic rearrangements in the family <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Didymiaceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="class">Myxomycetes</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>)</italic>. Mycological Progress 22: 1–24. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1007/s11557-022-01858-1" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-022-01858-1</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B31">
        <mixed-citation>Prjibelski A, Antipov D, Meleshko D et al. (2020) Using SPAdes <italic>de novo</italic> assembler. Current Protocols in Bioinformatics 70: e102. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1002/cpbi.102" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1002/cpbi.102</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B32">
        <mixed-citation>Raxworthy CJ, Smith BT (2021) Mining museums for historical DNA: advances and challenges in museomics. Trends in Ecology &amp; Evolution 36: 1049–1060. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/j.tree.2021.07.009" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2021.07.009</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B33">
        <mixed-citation>Ronikier A, Janik P, de Haan M et al. (2022) Importance of type specimen study for understanding genus boundaries-taxonomic clarifications in <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Lepidoderma</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> based on integrative taxonomy approach leading to resurrection of the old genus <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Polyschismium</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. Mycologia 114: 1008–1031. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1080/00275514.2022.2109914" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1080/00275514.2022.2109914</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B34">
        <mixed-citation>Sahlin K (2022) Strobealign: flexible seed size enables ultra-fast and accurate read alignment. Genome Biology 23: 260. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1186/s13059-022-02831-7" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-022-02831-7</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B35">
        <mixed-citation>Schaap P, Barrantes I, Minx P et al. (2016) The <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Physarum</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">polycephalum</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> genome reveals extensive use of prokaryotic two-component and metazoan-type tyrosine kinase signaling. Genome Biology and Evolution 8: 109–125. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1093/gbe/evv237" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evv237</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B36">
        <mixed-citation>Schnittler M, Dagamac NHA, Leontyev D et al. (2020) Quick n’ Cheap – a simplified workflow to barcode plasmodial slime molds (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="class">Myxomycetes</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>). Karstenia 58: 385–392. <ext-link xlink:href="10.29203/ka.2020.504" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.29203/ka.2020.504</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B37">
        <mixed-citation>Schnittler M, Leontyev D, Yatsiuk I et al. (2025) Species descriptions in myxomycetes – can we settle on rules for good taxonomic practice? IMA Fungus 16: e141199. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3897/imafungus.16.141199" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3897/imafungus.16.141199</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B38">
        <mixed-citation>Schnittler M, Shchepin ON, Dagamac NHA et al. (2017) Barcoding myxomycetes with molecular markers: challenges and opportunities. Nova Hedwigia 104: 323–341. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1127/nova_hedwigia/2017/0397" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1127/nova_hedwigia/2017/0397</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B39">
        <mixed-citation>Shchepin ON, Novozhilov YK, Woyzichovski J et al. (2022) Genetic structure of the prostist <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Physarum</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">albescens</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="phylum">Amoebozoa</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>) revealed by multiple markers and genotyping by sequencing. Molecular Ecology 31(1): 372–390. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/mec.16239" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.16239</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B40">
        <mixed-citation>Shumskaya M, Mironov KS, Ballesteros JA et al. (2023) DNA isolation and genome sequence of the 134-year-old holotype specimen of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Boletus</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">subvelutipes</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Peck. Ecology and Evolution 13: e10389. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1002/ece3.10389" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10389</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B41">
        <mixed-citation>Singh G (2019) Plant Systematics. CRC Press, Boca Raton, 792 pp. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1201/9780429289521" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429289521</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B42">
        <mixed-citation>Stephenson SL, Schnittler M, Novozhilov YK (2008) Myxomycete diversity and distribution from the fossil record to the present. Biodiversity and Conservation 17: 285–301. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1007/978-90-481-2801-3_5" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2801-3_5</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B43">
        <mixed-citation>Straub SCK, Parks M, Weitemier K et al. (2012) Navigating the tip of the genomic iceberg: next‐generation sequencing for plant systematics. American Journal of Botany 99: 349–364. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3732/ajb.1100335" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1100335</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B44">
        <mixed-citation>Takano H, Abe T, Sakurai R et al. (2001) The complete DNA sequence of the mitochondrial genome of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Physarum</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">polycephalum</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. Molecular and General Genetics 264: 539–545. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1007/s004380000357" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1007/s004380000357</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B45">
        <mixed-citation>Turland N, Wiersema J, Barrie F et al. (2018) International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Shenzhen Code) adopted by the Nineteenth International Botanical Congress Shenzhen, China, July 2017. Koeltz Botanical Books, Glashütten.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B46">
        <mixed-citation>Winston JE (1999) Describing species: practical taxonomic procedure for biologists. Columbia University Press, New York, 518 pp.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B47">
        <mixed-citation>Yatsiuk I, Leontyev D, Schnittler M et al. (2025) <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Arcyria</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and allied genera: taxonomic backbone and character evolution. Fungal Systematics and Evolution 15: 97–118. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3114/fuse.2025.15.04" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3114/fuse.2025.15.04</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B48">
        <mixed-citation>Zeng CX, Hollingsworth PM, Yang J et al. (2018) Genome skimming herbarium specimens for DNA barcoding and phylogenomics. Plant Methods 14: 43. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1186/s13007-018-0300-0" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1186/s13007-018-0300-0</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
    <sec sec-type="Additional information" id="sec13">
      <title>Additional information</title>
      <sec sec-type="Conflict of interest" id="sec14">
        <title>Conflict of interest</title>
        <p>The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Ethical statement" id="sec15">
        <title>Ethical statement</title>
        <p>No ethical statement was reported.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Artificial Intelligence (AI) use" id="sec16">
        <title>Artificial Intelligence (AI) use</title>
        <p>The authors accept full responsibility for the content of the manuscript, including the disclosure of any use of AI.</p>
        <p>No AI tools were used in the preparation of this manuscript.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Adherence to national and international regulations" id="sec17">
        <title>Adherence to national and international regulations</title>
        <p>All the fungal strains used in this study have been legally obtained, respecting the Convention on Biological Diversity (Rio Convention).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Funding" id="sec18">
        <title>Funding</title>
        <p>MSCA4Ukraine (project 1208119) to Dmytro Leontyev.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Author contributions" id="sec19">
        <title>Author contributions</title>
        <p>DL: Conceptualization, Investigation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Funding acquisition. MS: Supervision, Writing – review &amp; editing. OS: Supervision, Investigation, Data curation, Visualization, Writing – review &amp; editing.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Author ORCIDs" id="sec20">
        <title>Author ORCIDs</title>
        <p>D.V. Leontyev <ext-link xlink:href="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4122-1091" ext-link-type="uri">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4122-1091</ext-link></p>
        <p>M. Schnittler <ext-link xlink:href="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0909-5627" ext-link-type="uri">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0909-5627</ext-link></p>
        <p>O.N. Shchepin <ext-link xlink:href="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9327-7655" ext-link-type="uri">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9327-7655</ext-link></p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Data availability" id="sec21">
        <title>Data availability</title>
        <p>All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text or Supplementary materials. In addition, complete sets of genomic blob-plots and snail-plots for all studied specimens are deposited in Zenodo repository at <ext-link xlink:href="10.5281/zenodo.20467237" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20467237</ext-link>).</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="supplementary-material">
      <title>Supplementary materials</title>
      <supplementary-material id="S1" position="float" orientation="portrait" xlink:type="simple">
        <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/imafungus.17.201932.suppl1</object-id>
        <object-id content-type="arpha">FF0AAB76-9142-581B-8411-4FBC41111F92</object-id>
        <label>Supplementary material 1</label>
        <caption>
          <p>Supplementary tables</p>
        </caption>
        <statement content-type="dataType">
          <label>Data type</label>
          <p>xlsx</p>
        </statement>
        <statement content-type="notes">
          <label>Explanation note</label>
          <p>Sheet A. Collection data for the specimens used in the study. Sheet B. MultiBLAST for contigs where myxomycete genes could be identified. The established DNA barcode (nucSSU / 18S rRNA gene) is shown in red. Sheet C. Genes recognised in contigs identified as <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="class" reg="Eumycetozoa">Eumycetozoa</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. Standard barcoding and phylogenetic markers are shown in red. The total length / base coverage are shown for each contig (xlsx file).</p>
        </statement>
        <media xlink:href="imafungus-17-e201932-s001.xlsx" mimetype="application" mime-subtype="vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet" position="float" orientation="portrait" id="oo_1764441.xlsx">
          <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/file/1764441</uri>
        </media>
        <permissions>
          <license>
            <license-p>This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/">http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/</ext-link>). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.</license-p>
          </license>
        </permissions>
        <attrib specific-use="authors"> Dmytro V. Leontyev, Martin Schnittler, Oleg N. Shchepin</attrib>
      </supplementary-material>
      <supplementary-material id="S2" position="float" orientation="portrait" xlink:type="simple">
        <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/imafungus.17.201932.suppl2</object-id>
        <object-id content-type="arpha">0FCBBEAE-E7BA-5887-B705-969B10B9DC1F</object-id>
        <label>Supplementary material 2</label>
        <caption>
          <p>Sequences obtained from each studied specimen</p>
        </caption>
        <statement content-type="dataType">
          <label>Data type</label>
          <p>zip</p>
        </statement>
        <statement content-type="notes">
          <label>Explanation note</label>
          <p>Sequences obtained from each studied specimen by Illumina NovaSeq-based genome skimming and recognised as <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="class" reg="Eumycetozoa">Eumycetozoa</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (ZIP archive of FASTA files).</p>
        </statement>
        <media xlink:href="imafungus-17-e201932-s002.zip" mimetype="application" mime-subtype="zip" position="float" orientation="portrait" id="oo_1764442.zip">
          <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/file/1764442</uri>
        </media>
        <permissions>
          <license>
            <license-p>This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/">http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/</ext-link>). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.</license-p>
          </license>
        </permissions>
        <attrib specific-use="authors"> Dmytro V. Leontyev, Martin Schnittler, Oleg N. Shchepin</attrib>
      </supplementary-material>
      <supplementary-material id="S3" position="float" orientation="portrait" xlink:type="simple">
        <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/imafungus.17.201932.suppl3</object-id>
        <object-id content-type="arpha">357B80C9-4323-5F3C-921B-6336FB53D860</object-id>
        <label>Supplementary material 3</label>
        <caption>
          <p>Alignment of the fragment of nucSSU</p>
        </caption>
        <statement content-type="dataType">
          <label>Data type</label>
          <p>fas</p>
        </statement>
        <statement content-type="notes">
          <label>Explanation note</label>
          <p>Alignment of the fragment of nucSSU (18S rRNA gene) used for species barcoding in our data and reference barcodes of the respective taxa obtained by Sanger sequencing (FASTA file).</p>
        </statement>
        <media xlink:href="imafungus-17-e201932-s003.fas" mimetype="application" mime-subtype="fasta" position="float" orientation="portrait" id="oo_1764443.fas">
          <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/file/1764443</uri>
        </media>
        <permissions>
          <license>
            <license-p>This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/">http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/</ext-link>). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.</license-p>
          </license>
        </permissions>
        <attrib specific-use="authors"> Dmytro V. Leontyev, Martin Schnittler, Oleg N. Shchepin</attrib>
      </supplementary-material>
    </sec>
  </back>
</article>
