Research Article
Print
Research Article
Suillus bovinus sesquiterpenes stimulate root growth and ramification of host and non-host plants by coordinating plant auxin signaling pathways
expand article infoWanyan Feng, Xueguang Sun, Guiyun Yuan, Guijie Ding
‡ Guizhou University, Guiyang, China
Open Access

Abstract

Prior to physical contact, ectomycorrhizal (ECM) fungi can regulate plant root growth and ramification by emitting volatile organic compounds (VOCs). However, the underlying mechanisms of these VOC effects, as well as the key signaling molecules within the VOC blends, are largely unknown. Under sterile conditions, we studied the effects of the Suillus bovinus VOCs on the root growth of Pinus massoniana or Arabidopsis thaliana before physical contact. Exogenously added auxin inhibitors and auxin-related mutants were used to explore the role of auxin in the promotion of plant root development by S. bovinus VOCs. S. bovinus VOCs stimulated host P. massoniana and non-host A. thaliana lateral root formation (LRF). Although these effects were independent of the host, they exhibited a symbiotic fungal-specific feature. Sesquiterpenes (SQTs) were the main S. bovinus VOC component that promoted LRF in plants. Two SQTs, α-humulene and β-cedrene, utilized different auxin pathways to promote plant root growth but did not affect the formation of an ECM symbiotic relationship between P. massoniana and S. bovinus. These findings enhance our understanding of the role played by SQTs in the signal recognition mechanism during the ECM presymbiotic stage and their role in promoting plant growth.

Key words:

Auxin signaling, lateral root, presymbiosis, sesquiterpenes, volatile organic compounds

Introduction

Most plant root systems form a symbiotic relationship with mycorrhizal fungi, facilitating nutrient and water uptake, enhancing resilience to environmental stress, and promoting plant growth (Smith and Read 2008; Martin and van Der Heijden 2024). In forest ecosystems, ectomycorrhizal (ECM) symbiosis is a prevalent association, in which ECM fungi colonize tree roots and establish a Hartig net and mantle structure (van Der Heijden et al. 2015; Martin et al. 2016).

Efficient mutual recognition between host roots and ECM fungi via signaling molecules at the presymbiotic stage (before physical contact) is the prerequisite step for the formation of an ECM symbiosis (Garcia et al. 2015; Raudaskoski and Kothe 2015; Kothe and Turnau 2018). These signaling molecules can elicit responses, such as stimulating lateral root formation (LRF) (Felten et al. 2009; Ditengou et al. 2015), inducing spore germination (Kikuchi et al. 2007), and promoting directional growth (Horan and Chilvers 1990) to facilitate ECM mutualistic relationships. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are ideal signaling molecules owing to their low molecular weight (< 300 Da), low boiling point, strong lipophilicity, and diffusivity (Schmidt et al. 2015; Fincheira and Quiroz 2018). Research has shown that VOCs play a crucial role in the signal recognition process during the presymbiotic stage of ECM formation (Martin et al. 2001; Garcia et al. 2015; Pellegrin et al. 2019) and even promote ECM fungal colonization at the symbiotic stage (Plett et al. 2024). There is increasing evidence that ECM fungi can induce host plants and Arabidopsis thaliana, a non-host plant, to form lateral roots without making physical contact with the roots by releasing VOCs (Felten et al. 2009; Splivallo et al. 2009; Ditengou et al. 2015). This suggests that the effects of ECM fungal VOCs are not host-specific (Feng et al. 2022); however, whether the host plant’s response to VOCs is fungus–specific has yet to be determined.

Auxin is essential in regulating plant root development (Saini et al. 2013). Previous studies suggest that VOCs emitted by ECM fungi promote LRF via the auxin pathway (Ivanchenko et al. 2008; Stepanova et al. 2008; Splivallo et al. 2009; Sun et al. 2009). However, some research does not support this view. For example, sesquiterpene (SQT) (–)-thujopsene released by Laccaria bicolor stimulates LRF independently of the auxin pathway (Ditengou et al. 2015). This discrepancy may arise from variations in the types of VOCs released by different microbes. Interestingly, SQTs produced by other symbiotic fungi (non-ECM fungi) have been shown to depend on the auxin pathway for the regulation of LRF (Pérez-Flores et al. 2017; Tyagi et al. 2019; Li et al. 2022; He et al. 2023), indicating that this difference is also related to the specific plant–microbe symbiotic association.

Although many studies have investigated the role of microbial VOCs in plant–microbe interactions, studies involving ECM fungi have mainly focused on a few common combinations (such as PopulusL. bicolor). This has greatly limited the development and use of volatile resources produced by ECM fungi, which lag behind our understanding of the ECM symbiotic mechanism. Suillus species form symbiotic relationships with members of the Pinaceae (Policelli et al. 2019; Perez-Pazos et al. 2021) and are essential for colonization, diffusion, and invasion by conifer species (Rudawska et al. 2018; Ning et al. 2021). Meanwhile, Suillus is also considered a model system for studying ECM associations (Lofgren et al. 2024). Pinus massoniana is a vital timber and ecological tree species in China (Zhou 2001) and a typical ECM host. In a previous investigation, we observed that Suillus bovinus not only has ecological and economic value but also is one of the dominant edible mycorrhizal fungi in P. massoniana plantation (Sun et al. 2019). Previous studies have mostly focused on the ability of S. bovinus to improve the growth and stress adaptability of P. massoniana (Chen et al. 2022), but little is known about the mechanism of this symbiosis, especially the recognition mechanism of VOCs before physical contact has been made.

In this study, we sought to understand the interaction between S. bovinus and the roots of P. massoniana or A. thaliana through VOC prior to physical contact. Our aim was to identify the main VOCs and mechanisms involved in this interaction. We identified signaling molecules from VOC blends emitted by ECM fungus S. bovinus coordinate auxin signaling pathways to promote LRF in both host P. massoniana and nonhost A. thaliana. Two SQTs, α-humulene and β-cedrene, engage distinct auxin pathways to enhance plant root growth but do not affect the ECM symbiotic relationship between P. massoniana and S. bovinus. Our findings provide a theoretical basis for understanding signal recognition mechanisms during the presymbiotic stage of the ECM interaction.

Materials and methods

Plant and fungal materials

The ECM fungi Suillus bovinus, Suillus luteus, and Scleroderma citrinum; the dark septate endophytes (DSE) Phialocephala fortinii, and the saprophytic fungus Lycoperdon perlatum were provided by the Microbiology Laboratory at the Institute for Forest Resources & Environment of Guizhou, Guizhou University. These fungi were subcultured on modified Melin Norkran’s (MMN) medium (Marx 1969) at 25°C in the dark. The MMN medium composition included: 25 mg/L NaCl, 250 mg/L (NH4)2HPO4, 500 mg/L KH2PO4, 5 mg/L FeCl3, 50 mg/L CaCl2, 150 mg/L MgSO4·7H2O, 100 mg/L VB1, 10 g/L glucose, 1.00 g/L casamino acids, 5.00 g/L malt, and 10 g/L agar. Fusarium oxysporum is a type pathogenic fungus that caused root rot in trees, was obtained from the China General Microbiological Culture Collection Center and maintained on a medium containing glucose, peptone, yeast extract, and agar at 28°C. All fungi were cultured until suitable for inoculation.

Pinus massoniana seeds were collected from the high-quality breeding base of P. massoniana in Maanshan Forest Farm, Duyun City, Guizhou Province, China. Seeds were surface sterilized following Feng et al. (2022) and grown in a climate chamber for 28 days. Wildtype Arabidopsis thaliana ecotype Columbia-1 (col1) seeds were provided by Prof. Fuhua Fan, and the T-DNA insertion mutant lines, including yuc1, aux1, pin1, pin3, arf19, and tir1, were purchased from the AraShare Technology Service Center (Table 1). A. thaliana seeds were sterilized with 75% alcohol and stratified at 4°C for 3 days before use.

Table 1.

Information on auxin-related mutants in A. thaliana.

Mutant Mutant type Gene ID Description Pathway involved
yuc1 T-DNA insertion At4g32540 auxin biosynthesis auxin synthesis
aux1 At2g38120 auxin influx carrier auxin polar transport and distribution
pin1 At1g73590 auxin efflux carrier
pin3 At1g70940 auxin efflux carrier
arf19 At1g19220 auxin response factor 19 auxin signaling and responses
tir1 At3g62980 transport inhibitor response 1

Experimental methods

Experiment 1: in vitro interaction between P. massoniana and S. bovinus via VOCs

Following the experimental procedure described by Feng et al. (2022), bicompartmented Petri dishes (13 × 13 cm) were prepared, with basal medium (DCR; composed of 400 mg/L NH4NO3, 556 mg/L Ca(NO3)2·4H2O, 370 mg/L MgSO4·7H2O, 85 mg/L CaCl2·2H2O, 170 mg/L KH2PO4, 6.2 mg/L H3BO3, 22.3 mg/L MnSO4·H2O, 8.6 mg/L ZnSO4·7H2O, 0.25 mg/L CuSO4·5H2O, 0.83 mg/L KI, 0.025 mg/L CoCl2·6H2O, 0.025 mg/L LiCl, 0.25 mg/L NaMoO4·2H2O, 27.8 mg/L FeSO4·7H2O, 37.3 mg/L EDTA−2Na, 1.0 mg/L VB1, 0.5 mg/L VB6, 0.5 mg/L nicotinic acid, 2.0 mg/L glycine, 200 mg/L myo−inositol, 10 g/L sucrose, and 10 g/L agar) (Gupta and Durzan 1985) in one compartment, and MMN medium in the other. The MMN medium was inoculated with a mycelial plug of either S. bovinus, S. luteus, S. citrinum, P. fortinii, L. perlatum, or F. oxysporum. A 28-day-old P. massoniana seedling was placed in the DCR medium compartment. Non-inoculated dishes served as controls (10 replicates per treatment). Dishes were incubated in a 25°C climate chamber with a 14-hour light and 10-hour dark photoperiod. Root growth was monitored weekly, and root length, branching, and biomass were measured after 28 days.

Pinus massoniana exposed to S. bovinus VOCs in bicompartmented Petri dishes for 28 days were utilized for plant hormone assays. Three biological replicates of both the control (NM) and S. bovinus VOC treatment were collected as fresh tissue. Five seedlings from each treatment were combined to form one replicate. All samples were subsequently frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C until the phytohormone assay was conducted. Plant hormones were quantified using ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) and tandem mass spectrometry. The liquid phase conditions were set according to the methodologies outlined by Cai et al. (2014), Niu et al. (2014), and Hua-Ming et al. (2018), and mass spectrometry conditions were based on the protocols of Pan et al. (2010), Simura et al. (2018), and Cui et al. (2015).

A “Y”-shaped PVC pipe system (Suppl. material 1: fig. S1a) was also used to study root growth in response to S. bovinus VOCs under similar conditions. Root growth was observed after 60 days.

Figure 1. 

Effects of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) emitted by Suillus bovinus (Sb) on the growth of Pinus massoniana. Seedlings grown in the absence of S. bovinus VOCs acted as controls (NM). a Number of branches, b root length, and c fresh weight of P. massoniana. n = 10. Data shown are mean values ± the standard error. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01. P. massoniana seedlings grown in the d absence and e presence of S. bovinus VOCs for 28 days. Scale bars: 2 cm.

Experiment 2: impact of SQTs emitted by S. bovinus on plant growth

Fungal VOC collection and identification

To investigate the volatiles signaling utilized by symbiotic fungi to enhance plant root growth, we compared the volatile profiles of four symbiotic fungi: S. bovinus, S. luteus, S. citrinum, and P. fortinii. MMN medium inoculated with a plug of each fungus was cultured in headspace vials at 25°C for 14 days (6 replicates). VOCs were collected using headspace-solid phase microextraction (SPME) and analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). VOC identification was performed using selected ion monitoring. Fungal VOC identification and analysis were conducted by Metware Biotechnology Inc. (http://www.metware.cn; Wuhan, China).

Impacts of SQTs emitted by S. bovinus on plant growth

β-Cedrene (CAS:546–28–1; 95%; Shanghai Macklin Biochemical Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China) and α-humulene (CAS:6753-98-6; 93%; Shanghai Yuanye Bio-Technology Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China) were dissolved in anhydrous ethanol to prepare solutions with concentrations of 1, 10, 100 and 1000 ppb. According to the method of Ditengou et al. (2015), P. massoniana seedlings and wildtype A. thaliana seeds were exposed to various concentrations of β-cedrene or α-humulene in bicompartmented Petri dish. Fifty microlitres of β-cedrene or α-humulene solution was dropped on the filter paper (2 cm diameter), and controls received 50 μl of ethanol. Lovastatin (CAS:75330-75-5; 98%; Solarbio, Beijing, China), an inhibitor of fungal SQT production (Bach and Lichtenthaler 1982; Rodríguez-Concepción 2006), was also tested. The P. massoniana (28-day-old) seedlings or wildtype A. thaliana seeds were cultivated in one compartment of the bi-compartmented system and subjected to five different treatments, which were performed in the other compartment. (i) A 1-cm-diameter S. bovinus plug inoculated on MMN medium; (ii) Not inoculated with S. bovinus plug on MMN medium; (iii) A 1-cm-diameter S. bovinus plug inoculated on MMN medium containing lovastatin; (iv) A 1-cm-diameter S. bovinus plug inoculated on MMN medium containing lovastatin, and supplemented a filter paper with 50 μl of 1000 ppb (or 10 ppb for A. thaliana seeds) β-cedrene; (v) A 1-cm-diameter S. bovinus plug inoculated on MMN medium containing lovastatin, and supplemented a filter paper with 50 μl of 100 ppb (or 10 ppb for A. thaliana seeds) α-humulene solution. Plants of each treatment were grown under the same condition as in Experiment 1. Plant growth was monitored, and root length, branching, and biomass were measured. For A. thaliana, branch numbers were recorded after 20 days.

Role of the auxin pathway in S. bovinus VOC effects

Solutions of 1‐N‐naphthylphthalamic acid (NPA; CAS:132-66-1; Shanghai Macklin Biochemical Co., Ltd; an inhibitor of auxin transport) were prepared at final concentrations of 1, 3, and 5 μM. Additionally, solutions of yucasin (CAS:26028-65-9; Shanghai Macklin Biochemical Co., Ltd; an inhibitor of auxin synthesis) were prepared at final concentrations of 10, 50, and 100 μM. Different concentrations of NPA and yucasin were applied to P. massoniana seedlings and A. thaliana seeds exposed to S. bovinus VOCs or β-cedrene/α-humulene. Significantly, 50 μM yucasin limited A. thaliana seeds germination, so the concentration of yucasin solutions were adjusted to 1, 2, 5 or 10 μM. Plant growth parameters were recorded. The effects of S. bovinus VOCs, β-cedrene or α-humulene on A. thaliana IAA-associated mutants were also tested by a bicompartmented system.

Experiment 3: effects of exogenous SQTs on ECM formation

Pinus massoniana seedlings were grown in a sterilized substrate (comprising peat, perlite, and vermiculite (3:1:1 by volume)) under controlled conditions. Four treatments were applied: inoculated with S. bovinus, inoculated with S. bovinus and supplemented with 1000 ppb β-cedrene, inoculated with S. bovinus and supplemented with α-humulene, and uninoculated. β-Cedrene and α-humulene were mixed with Hoagland solution and added once a week. Only Hoagland solution was added to the seedlings of the uninoculated and inoculated with S. bovinus. There were 30 pots of each treatment. After 90 days, mycorrhizal infection, seedling height, biomass, and root/shoot ratio were measured. Observe the ECM microstructure with reference to the method of Feng et al. (2022), and measure the thickness of mantle and the depth of Hartig net. Hartig net depth and mantle thickness were quantified using ImageJ software (http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/) by analyzing five independent root tips per treatment, with five measurements recorded per micrograph and then averaged.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using SPSS 25.0. Significant differences were determined by Student’s t-test or ANOVA with Duncan’s test (P < 0.05). Graphs were produced using Origin 2021. Venn diagrams of fungal VOCs were generated using Venny 2.1.0. (https://bioinfogp.cnb.csic.es/tools/venny/index.html).

Results

Effects of fungal VOCs on the growth of P. massoniana

To investigate the impact of VOCs produced by ECM fungi on plant growth, we examined the effects of S. bovinus-emitted VOCs on root growth and plant hormone levels in P. massoniana. After 28 days of exposure to S. bovinus VOCs, the P. massoniana lateral root number, root length and biomass were 46.97% (Fig. 1a), 29.04% (Fig. 1b), and 35.48% greater (Fig. 1c), respectively, than those of P. massoniana grown in the absence of S. bovinus VOCs. IAA accumulation in P. massoniana exposed to S. bovinus VOCs was 58.11% greater than that of P. massoniana grown in the absence of S. bovinus VOCs but had no significant effect on the accumulation of other phytohormones (Fig. 2). In the “Y-tube” experiment, roots grew toward the pipe containing the S. bovinus culture, with minimal or no growth toward the uninoculated medium (Suppl. material 1: fig. S1b).

Figure 2. 

Effects of Suillus bovinus (Sb) volatile organic compounds (VOCs) on phytohormone accumulation in Pinus massoniana. Seedlings grown in the absence of S. bovinus VOCs acted as controls (NM). Phytohormones: a indole-3-acetic acid (IAA); b abscisic acid (ABA); c gibberellic acid (GA3); d salicylic acid (SA); e trans-zeatin (tZA); f cis-zeatin (cZA); g 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC). Data shown are mean values ± the SE. n = 3. ** P < 0.01.

To assess the specificity of the effects of S. bovinus VOCs on plant growth, we examined the influence of VOCs emitted by other symbiotic, pathogenic, and saprophytic fungi on the root growth of P. massoniana. P. massoniana exposed to VOCs emitted by three other symbiotic fungi (i.e., S. luteus, S. citrinum, or P. fortinii) also showed significantly enhanced growth, including LRF and root elongation (Fig. 3a, b). However, the root growth of P. massoniana exposed to saprophytic fungi L. perlatum VOCs was not significantly different to that of the control (Fig. 3c, d). Conversely, the LRF of P. massoniana exposed to VOCs emitted by pathogenic fungi F. oxysporum was inhibited (Fig. 3e, f).

Figure 3. 

Effects of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) emitted by three different types of fungi on the root growth of Pinus massoniana. a–f represent the number of root branches and root length of Pinus massoniana exposed to VOCs emitted by symbiotic fungi (Sl, Suillus luteus; Sc, Scleroderma citrinum; Pf, Phialocephala fortinii), a saprophytic fungus (Lp, Lycoperdon perlatum) and a pathogenic fungus (Fo, Fusarium oxysporum), respectively. Due to the fast growth rate of F. oxysporum, only 14 days of P. massoniana root growth data were collected, while the rest of the fungi collected 28 days of data. n = 10. NM, P. massoniana grown in the absence of fungal VOCs. Different letters above bars indicate significant differences between treatments (P < 0.05).

VOCs profiles of symbiotic fungi

To identify the signaling compounds in VOCs that promote plant root growth, we compared the volatile profiles of four symbiotic fungi: S. bovinus, S. luteus, S. citrinum, and P. fortinii. The VOC spectrum emitted by four symbiotic fungi, including terpenoids, alcohols, esters, hydrocarbons, ketones, and heterocyclic compounds, etc (Suppl. material 1: table S1). Terpenoids were the most abundant, with SQTs being particularly prevalent. Among the four symbiotic fungi, the S. bovinus VOC profile had the largest proportion of terpenoids (63.83%) and the P. fortinii VOC profile had the smallest proportion of terpenoids (20.00%) (Suppl. material 1: fig. S2b). The VOCs produced by DSE P. fortinii promote P. massoniana LRF more effectively than those produced by ECM fungi; however, there was no significant difference in the VOC effects among the ECM fungi (Fig. 3a). Only twenty-six VOCs were shared by all three ECM fungi, nine of which were terpenoids, most of which were SQTs (7) (Table 2; Suppl. material 1: fig. S2a). β-Cedrene and α-humulene were among the shared SQTs produced by the three ECM fungi but were not present in the P. fortinii VOC profile. Previous researches described that these two SQTs analogues, such as β-caryophyllene (Minerdi et al. 2011; Yamagiwa et al. 2011) and cedrene (Li et al. 2022) can promote plant growth, therefore, it is speculated that the terpenoids β-cedrene and α-humulene play an important role in the presymbiotic stage between P. massoniana and S. bovinus.

Table 2.

Twenty six shared volatile organic compounds (VOCs) emitted by Suillus bovinus, Suillus luteus, and Scleroderma citrinum.

Formula Compounds Class CAS
C5H8O 3-Pentyn-1-ol Alcohol 10229-10-4
C7H8O2 Benzenemethanol, 4-hydroxy- Alcohol 623-05-2
C10H8 Naphthalene Aromatics 91-20-3
C10H12 Benzene, 1-methyl-3-(1-methylethenyl)- Aromatics 1124-20-5
C10H12O3 Ethyl mandelate Ester 774-40-3
C11H14O3 Benzoic acid, 4-ethoxy-, ethyl ester Ester 23676-09-7
C6H6O2 Ethanone, 1-(2-furanyl)- Heterocyclic compound 1192-62-7
C6H6O3 Isomaltol Heterocyclic compound 3420-59-5
C13H28 Undecane, 2,4-dimethyl- Hydrocarbons 17312-80-0
C11H24 Decane, 5-methyl- Hydrocarbons 13151-35-4
C8H16 1-Octene Hydrocarbons 111-66-0
C8H14 1,5-Heptadiene, 2-methyl-, (Z)- Hydrocarbons 41044-64-8
C12H16O 3-Hexanone, 1-phenyl- Ketone 29898-25-7
C13H20O Butanone, 4-(2,6,6-trimethyl-1,3-cyclohexadien-1-yl)- Ketone 20483-36-7
C10H18O3 2-Methylbutanoic anhydride Others 1468-39-9
C2H6S3 Dimethyl trisulfide compounds Sulfur compounds 3658-80-8
C6H14S2 Disulfide compounds, dipropyl Sulfur compounds 629-19-6
C15H24 (1R,4R,4aS,8aR)-4,7-Dimethyl-1-(prop-1-en-2-yl)-1,2,3,4,4a,5,6,8a-octahydronaphthalene Terpenoids 92692-39-2
C15H24 1,6,10-Dodecatriene, 7,11-dimethyl-3-methylene- Terpenoids 77129-48-7
C15H24 Naphthalene, 1,2,3,5,6,8a-hexahydro-4,7-dimethyl-1-(1-methylethyl)-, (1S-cis)- Terpenoids 483-76-1
C15H24 Spiro[4.5]dec-7-ene,1,8-dimethyl-4-(1-methylethenyl)-,[1S-(1α,4β,5α)]- Terpenoids 24048-44-0
C15H24 1-Isopropyl-4,7-dimethyl-1,2,3,5,6,8 a-hexahydronaphthalene Terpenoids 16729-01-4
C15H24 β-Cedrene Terpenoids 546-28-1
C15H24 α-Humulene Terpenoids 6753-98-6
C10H16 Cyclohexene, 1-methyl-4-(1-methylethylidene)- Terpenoids 586-62-9
C13H20O α-Ionone Terpenoids 127-41-3

Effects of SQTs on plant growth

To investigate the growth-promoting effects of SQTs, we examined the impact of two SQTs, β-cedrene and α-humulene, common to the three ECM fungi, on root growth in the host P. massoniana and non-host A. thaliana. β-Cedrene and α-humulene both significantly promoted P. massoniana root development. After 35 days, the number of root branches of seedlings exposed to 1000 ppb β-cedrene was significantly greater than those exposed to 0, 1 or 10 ppb β-cedrene (Fig. 4a ,e). However, root length was not significantly affected by exposure to β-cedrene (Fig. 4b). By contrast, root development was promoted by 100 ppb α-humulene (Fig. 4e). Compared with seedlings in the control group (0 ppb), seedlings exposed to 100 ppb α-humulene exhibited a 37.92% increase in the number of root branches (Fig. 4c) and a 29.65% increase in root length (Fig. 4d). When the biosynthesis of SQTs by S. bovinus was blocked by lovastatin, there was no significant effect on P. massoniana root branching or root length. However, when 1000 ppb β-cedrene or 100 ppb α-humulene were also added to the fungal medium, P. massoniana root branching (Fig. 4f) and root length (Fig. 4g) were not significantly different to that of seedlings grown in the presence of S. bovinus without lovastatin.

Figure 4. 

Effects of β-cedrene and α-humulene, sesquiterpenes (SQTs) emitted by Suillus bovinus (Sb), on the growth of Pinus massoniana. Effects of different concentrations of β-cedrene on a root branching and b root length. Effects of different concentrations of α-humulene on c root branching and d root length. e Images of P. massoniana seedlings after 35 days of 1000 ppb β-cedrene or 100 ppb α-humulene treatment, CK, control seedlings; Scale bars: 2 cm. Effects of adding of β-cedrene or α-humulene to culture medium containing lovastatin (Lov) inhibits (which inhibits the synthesis of S. bovinus SQTs) on f root branching and g root length. n = 15. Error bars indicate ± the SE. Different letters between treatment after the same number of days of VOC exposure in (a, c), and different letters above the columns in (b, d, f, g) indicate significant differences between treatments (P < 0.05).

β-Cedrene and α-humulene also promote the LRF in the non-host A. thaliana. Concentrations of 10–100 ppb β-cedrene and 10 ppb α-humulene significantly increased the number of root branches (Fig. 5a). Furthermore, β-cedrene (10 ppb) and α-humulene (10 ppb) restored LRF in A. thaliana when lovastatin blocked SQT synthesis in S. bovinus (Lov + Sb + β-cedrene; Lov + Sb + α-humulene) (Fig. 5b).

Figure 5. 

Effects of β-cedrene and α-humulene on Arabidopsis thaliana root growth. a Number of root branches produced by seedlings exposed to different concentrations of the sesquiterpenes (SQTs) β-cedrene or α-humulene; b effects of adding β-cedrene (10 ppb) or α-humulene (10 ppb) to culture medium containing lovastatin (Lov) (which inhibits the synthesis of Suillus bovinus (Sb) SQTs) on root branching, n = 15. Data shown are means ± the SE. Different letters above bars indicate significant differences between treatments (P < 0.05).

Role of auxin signaling pathway on VOC-induced effects

To investigate the involvement of the auxin signaling pathway in root growth induced by S. bovinus VOCs, we used an auxin inhibitor and A. thaliana auxin-related mutants to determine whether the root growth promotion effect was retained under different treatments. The promoting effect of S. bovinus, β-cedrene and α-humulene on P. massoniana root growth was repressed by the auxin synthesis inhibitor yucasin (Fig. 6a,b). At yucasin concentrations of 50 μM and 100 μM, P. massoniana lateral roots exposed to β-cedrene or α-humulene did not develop or even wilted (Fig. 6a). By contrast, the auxin transport inhibitor NPA had little effect on P. massoniana lateral root growth induced by S. bovinus or β-cedrene but weakened the promotion effect of α-humulene on root branching (Fig. 6c, d). At an NPA concentration of 5 μM, the number of P. massoniana lateral roots was significantly reduced by 30.83% (Fig. 6c) compared with those of control seedlings, which were not subject to NPA.

Figure 6. 

Effects of the auxin synthesis inhibitor yucasin and the auxin transport inhibitor 1-N-naphthylphthalamic acid (NPA) on Pinus massoniana root development induced by Suillus bovinus volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Effects of adding different concentrations of the indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) synthesis inhibitor yucasin to medium inoculated with S. bovinus, or containing α-humulene or β-cedrene on a the number of P. massoniana root branches and b root length. The absence of some data for seedlings subjected to 50 M or 100 M yucasin is because P. massoniana wilted under these treatments. Effects of adding different concentrations of the IAA transport inhibitor NPA to medium inoculated with S. bovinus or containing α-humulene or β-cedrene on c the number of P. massoniana root branches and d root length. n = 15. Different letters above bars indicate significant differences between treatments (P < 0.05).

Similarly, both yucasin and NPA restricted the promoting of S. bovinus, β-cedrene, and α-humulene on the lateral root development of the nonhost A. thaliana (Fig. 7a, b). However, NPA treatment did not significant impact β-cedrene-induced LRF (Fig. 7b).

Figure 7. 

Effects of the auxin synthesis inhibitor yucasin and the auxin transport inhibitor 1‐N‐naphthylphthalamic acid (NPA) on Arabidopsis thaliana lateral root branch development induced by Suillus bovinus volatile organic compounds (VOCs). a Effects of adding different concentrations of yucasin to medium inoculated with S. bovinus or containing β-cedrene or α-humulene; b effects of adding different concentrations of NPA to medium inoculated with S. bovinus or containing β-cedrene or α-humulene. n = 15. Different letters above bars indicate significant differences between treatments (P < 0.05).

Similar to the wildtype A. thaliana experiment, exposure to S. bovinus VOCs induced more root branching in most A. thaliana mutants compared with those that were not exposed to S. bovinus VOCs (NM treatment) (Fig. 8). Interestingly, exposure to S. bovinus VOCs did not increase the number of lateral roots in pin1 and tir1 lines (Fig. 8a) but did promote primary root elongation of the pin1 line (Fig. 8b). The promotion of LRF by β-cedrene and α-humulene was not observed in the arf19 line (Fig. 9a, c). Furthermore, α-humulene did not induce branching in the tir1 line (Fig. 9b, c). Additionally, while S. bovinus VOCs seemed to stimulate shoot growth (Fig. 8b, data not collected), neither β-cedrene nor α-humulene had this effect (Fig. 9c).

Figure 8. 

Effects of auxin-related gene function on Suillus bovinus-induced Arabidopsis thaliana root development. a Number of root branches in A. thaliana col1 wildtype and in the T-DNA insertion mutant lines yuc1, aux1, pin1, pin3, arf19, and tir1 grown in the presence of S. bovinus (Sb) volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and in the absence of S. bovinus VOCs (NM) (n = 15). Error bars indicate ± the SE. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ns, no significant difference between treatments. b Photographs showing the influence of S. bovinus VOCs on root architecture. Scale bar: 2 cm.

Figure 9. 

Effects of auxin-related gene function on β-cedrene- and α-humulene-induced Arabidopsis thaliana root development. Number of root branches in A. thaliana col1 wildtype and in the T-DNA insertion mutant lines yuc1, aux1, pin1, pin3, arf19, and tir1 (a) grown in the presence of β-cedrene (shown in red) or in the absence of β-cedrene (shown in black), and (b) grown in the presence of α-humulene (shown in red) or in the absence of α-humulene (shown in black) (n = 15). Error bars indicate ± the SE. “*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; “ns, no significant difference between treatments. c Photographs showing the influence of β-cedrene and α-humulene on root architecture. Scale bar: 2 cm.

Effects of β-cedrene and α-humulene on the formation of an ECM symbiosis between P. massoniana and S. bovinus

To explore the role of SQTs in establishing ECM symbiosis, we observed the formation of ECM symbionts between P. massoniana and S. bovinus treated with β-cedrene and α-humulene. Overall, there was no significant difference in P. massoniana growth across NM, M, M+β-cedrene, and M+α-humulene treatments; however, the root development of seedlings inoculated with S. bovinus (M) was significantly greater than that of uninoculated seedlings (NM) (Suppl. material 1: table S2). Compared with the NM treatment, the M, M+β-cedrene and M+α-humulene treatments significantly increased the root/shoot ratio of P. massoniana by 47.06%, 47.06% and 41.18%, respectively (Suppl. material 1: table S2). Furthermore, the presence of β-cedrene and α-humulene increased the proportion of P. massoniana roots infected by S. bovinus, particularly β-cedrene (Suppl. material 1: fig. S3). Colonization of P. massoniana roots by S. bovinus led to the development of dichotomous branches mycorrhizae with well-developed mantle and Hartig net (Fig. 10). By contrast, under the NM treatment, there were no hyphae present between cells or on the root surface (Fig. 10d, h). The presence of β-cedrene or α-humulene did not significantly affect the depth of Hartig nets and the thickness of the mantle in the ECM symbiotic between P. massoniana and S. bovinus (Fig. 10i, j).

Figure 10. 

Effects of β-cedrene and α-humulene on the formation of an ectomycorrhizal (ECM) symbiosis between Pinus massoniana and Suillus bovinus. Morphology of dichotomous root branches of seedlings subjected to: a S. bovinus inoculation (M), b M+β-cedrene; c M+α-humulene treatment; or d no inoculation (NM). Cross-sections showing the microstructure of the P. massonianaS. bovinus ECM association of seedlings subjected to: e M; f M+β-cedrene; g M+α-humulene; or h NM; the dye used was 0.03% trypan blue. i Depth of Hartig nets and j thickness of mantle under different treatments. Error bars indicate ± the SE, n = 5. Different letters above bars indicate significant differences between treatments. Red arrows indicate extraradical mycelium, white arrows indicate the mantle, and yellow arrows indicate Hartig nets.

Discussion

VOCs produced by microbes can diffuse through the atmosphere and soil, acting as crucial chemical signals in plant-microbe interactions. Previous studies have demonstrated that VOCs are involved in the signal exchange between plants and their fungal partners during the establishment of ECM symbioses (Ditengou et al. 2015; Garcia et al. 2015; Daguerre et al. 2016). In this study, we investigated the VOCs involved in the interaction between P. massoniana roots and S. bovinus during the presymbiotic stage and elucidated their mechanisms of action. Our findings indicate that the SQTs, β-cedrene and α-humulene, mediate the auxin pathway to regulate plant root growth and development during the presymbiotic stage of the P. massoniana and S. bovinus ECM association.

Symbiotic fungal VOCs promote plant root growth

Traditionally, the beneficial functions of rhizosphere microbes in plant growth and development were thought to rely on direct microbe–root contact (Bais et al. 2004; Beauregard et al. 2013). However, VOCs released by microorganisms have been shown to enhance plant growth from a distance (Ditengou et al. 2015; Li et al. 2022; He et al. 2023; Wang et al. 2023). In this study, S. bovinus significantly promoted LRF and roots elongation in P. massoniana via VOCs, without direct root contact. Additionally, it induced root growth toward the source of the VOCs. LRF was considered to be a typical morphology in the early stage of mycorrhizal colonization because it was enhancing mycelium–root contact opportunities (Barker et al. 1998). These findings suggested that S. bovinus VOCs facilitates the communication and recognition by promoting P. massoniana LRF and directional root growth during the presymbiotic stage. Significantly, the effect of S. bovinus VOCs in promoting LRF may not be host-specific (Feng et al. 2022).

In addition to VOCs emitted by S. bovinus, we observed that VOCs emitted by other symbiotic fungi, including the ECM fungi S. luteus and S. citrinum, as well as the DSE P. fortinii, also stimulated P. massoniana LRF. Previous studies have similarly demonstrated that VOCs from other ECM fungi (Ditengou et al. 2015) and non-ECM fungi (Li et al. 2022; He et al. 2023; Liu et al. 2024) exhibit comparable functions. These findings suggest that plant root responses to VOCs from beneficial symbiotic fungi may not be specific to particular fungal species. Interestingly, pathogens also interact with plants via VOCs before physical contact (Venturi and Fuqua 2013). In our study, we observed that VOCs released by F. oxysporum inhibited the root growth of P. massoniana. In contrast, Moisan et al. (2019) and Hernández-Calderón et al. (2018) reported that VOCs emitted by pathogens can promoted plant growth, similar to the effects of VOCs from symbiotic fungi. Conversely, other studies have shown that VOCs released by pathogens may not affect plant growth (Tahir et al. 2017). Variations in plant responses to pathogen-emitted VOCs may result from differences in VOCs composition and concentration. Additionally, Peng et al. (2021) found that saprophytic fungi can act as mycorrhizal partners to promote host plant growth, suggesting that their VOCs may also play a similar role. However, in this study, VOCs emitted by the saprophytic fungus L. perlatum had no significant effect on P. massoniana growth. This lack of effect may be attributed to differences in fungal species, or it may suggest that saprophytic fungi L. perlatum necessitate direct contact to facilitate plant growth, which deserves further study. In this study, we propose that P. massoniana’s response to VOCs depends on the relationship between the fungi and the plant: VOCs from mutualistic fungi tend to promote root growth, those from pathogens inhibit growth, and those from saprophytic fungi have no effect.

SQTs mimic S. bovinus VOC-induced effects on LRF promotion

Previous studies have shown that the ECM fungus Cenococcum geophilum, which does not release SQTs, fails to induce LRF before physical contact, indicating the importance of SQTs in this process (Agger et al. 2009; Ditengou et al. 2015). In this study, the emission of SQTs by S. bovinus was crucial for promoting lateral roots’ emergence. This conclusion was further supported by experiments using lovastatin, an inhibitor of SQT biosynthesis, which significantly reduced the positive effect of S. bovinus VOCs on P. massoniana LRF, with similar effects observed in the non-host A. thaliana. These findings are consistent with previous reports (Ditengou et al. 2015; Li et al. 2022) and underscore that the effects of S. bovinus VOCs are not specific to host plants.

Furthermore, we identified two SQTs, β-cedrene and α-humulene, which were exclusively present in the VOC profiles of the three ECM fungi tested, indicating that these two SQTs may be specific to ECM fungi. These SQTs were sufficient to stimulate LRF in both the host P. massoniana and the non-host A. thaliana in the absence of S. bovinus, and even when SQT biosynthesis was inhibited by lovastatin. The roles of these two SQTs in plant–microbe interactions have not been previously demonstrated; however, their analogs (such as β-caryophyllene and cedrene) have been shown to induce plant growth (Minerdi et al. 2011; Yamagiwa et al. 2011; Li et al. 2022). Our study demonstrates their function as signaling compounds in the interaction between P. massoniana roots and S. bovinus at the presymbiotic stage, which is a novel finding.

Further analysis of their roles during the symbiotic formation of the P. massonianaS. bovinus symbiosis revealed that β-cedrene and α-humulene do not significantly influence ECM symbiosis development, including the formation of the mantle and Hartig net. This is consistent with findings by Plett et al. (2024), who also observed that the addition of terpenes did not affect Hartig net development. Given that SQTs enhance the proportion of P. massoniana roots infected by S. bovinus, we hypothesize that VOCs signaling molecules may increase the likelihood of contact between roots and ECM fungal hyphae, thereby promoting favorable conditions for ECM formation. Meanwhile, other signaling molecules, such as phytohormones like ABA, as reported by Hill et al. (2022), may play crucial roles in initiating symbiosis. However, it remains unclear whether other VOC profiles contain signaling molecules besides β-cedrene and α-humulene that are involved in communication during the ECM presymbiotic stage. Future research should focus on large-scale screening for additional volatile signaling compounds and further analysis of their molecular mechanisms to determine their role in triggering LRF.

Promotion effect of SQTs on root development relies on the auxin signaling pathway

Auxin, a crucial plant hormone, is widely recognized for its role in regulating LRF (Fukaki and Tasaka 2009). Previous studies have shown that microbial VOCs stimulate root branching by activating the host auxin signaling pathway (Felten et al. 2009; He et al. 2023; Liu et al. 2024). In this study, we demonstrated that S. bovinus VOCs significantly enhanced P. massoniana root branching and increased IAA accumulation in P. massoniana. These findings highlight the pivotal role of auxin in root development triggered by S. bovinus VOCs. Experiments using auxin biosynthesis and transport inhibitors further supported this conclusion. Yucasin, an auxin biosynthesis inhibitor, attenuated the effects of S. bovinus β-cedrene and α-humulene on LRF in both host and non-host plants, suggesting that YUC –mediated auxin biosynthesis is crucial in S. bovinus VOCs-induced LRF. This corroborates findings by Li et al. (2022), Zhang et al. (2022) and Wang et al. (2021). However, Ditengou et al. (2015) reported that SQTs released by L. bicolor could stimulate LRF independently of the auxin pathway. The discrepancy between these findings and those of other studies may stem from differences in the VOC profiles of different fungal species. Moreover, studies have shown that disrupting auxin polar transport alters auxin accumulation in roots and affects root growth (Zamioudis et al. 2013; Li et al. 2022; He et al. 2023). For instance, the ECM host Populus and non-host A. thaliana exposed to L. bicolor VOCs showed restricted LRF after NPA treatment (Felten et al. 2009), and a recently reported study had similar results (Qin et al. 2024). In our study, only the non-host A. thaliana was affected by NPA treatment, whereas S. bovinus VOCs continued to promote LRF in the host plant P. massoniana. This suggests that S. bovinus VOCs may contain auxin-independent signaling molecules that stimulate P. massoniana LRF. Importantly, S. bovinus VOC effects are not host specific, and the underlying mechanism may vary, potentially operating differently in different plant species. Furthermore, we observed that α-humulene induced LRF in both P. massoniana and A. thaliana via auxin polar transport, whereas β-cedrene did not, indicating that different VOCs enhance LRF through distinct mechanisms.

Interestingly, S. bovinus VOCs, β-cedrene and α-humulene, promoted LRF in A. thaliana yuc1 mutants, contrasting with the yucasin results, which inhibits auxin biosynthesis. Since 11 members of the YUCCA gene family have been detected in A. thaliana (Mashiguchi et al. 2011), other YUCCA genes may be involved in this process. The AUX1/LAX and PIN protein families have distinct roles in auxin influx and efflux, respectively (Pacifici et al. 2015). The effect of S. bovinus VOCs on A. thaliana lateral root growth was abolished in pin1 mutants but remained unchanged in aux1 mutants, indicating that PIN1 is involved in the development of lateral roots stimulated by S. bovinus VOCs. This further supports our hypothesis that S. bovinus VOCs stimulate A. thaliana LRF through auxin polar transport, requiring a functional auxin efflux system, as also suggested by previous studies (Sun et al. 2020; He et al. 2023). Treatment with NPA attenuated the ability of α-humulene to stimulate LRF in both P. massoniana and non-host A. thaliana, whereas β-cedrene was unaffected. Interestingly, experiments with A. thaliana mutants indicated that the promotion effects of α-humulene may not rely on auxin polar transport, given that it induced LRF in aux1, pin1, and pin3 mutants. These results contradict the outcomes of the NPA inhibitor trail, suggesting that α-humulene might stimulate LRF through other auxin influx and efflux carriers, which warrants further investigation.

Auxin signal transduction is crucial for regulating plant LRF in response to microbial VOCs (Tyagi et al. 2018). Studies by Li et al. (2022) and He et al. (2023) suggest that microbial VOCs promote LRF through complete auxin signal transduction, a finding supported by our study. In plants, the primary auxin signaling pathway involves the auxin receptor TIR1/AFB, AUX/IAA signal response factors, and ARF transcription factors (Hayashi 2012). While S. bovinus VOCs continued to promote root branching in A. thaliana arf19 mutants, neither β-cedrene nor α-humulene alone could induce LRF in these mutants, indicating that the regulatory mechanism of S. bovinus VOCs on root branching likely involves multiple signaling molecules rather than a single pathway.

Additionally, S. bovinus VOCs appeared to stimulate shoot growth in A. thaliana. This could be due to enhanced lateral root formation, which improves nutrient absorption and promotes shoot growth (Zhang et al. 2022), or the VOCs may contain unidentified plant growth regulators or signaling molecules, as neither β-cedrene nor α-humulene had this effect. Further research is needed to explore these hypotheses.

Conclusion

Our study confirmed that S. bovinus VOCs can influence plant root architecture without direct contact with the plant, independent of host specificity, with SQTs identified as the primary VOC signals involved in this process. Specifically, α-humulene and β-cedrene, two specific SQTs, were identified as signaling molecules that modulate different auxin pathways to enhance host plant P. massoniana and nonhost A. thaliana root branching (Fig. 11). However, these findings alone do not fully explain how S. bovinus VOCs regulate LRF, necessitating further investigation. In addition, α-humulene and β-cedrene do not affect the ECM symbiotic relationship between P. massoniana and S. bovinus. In conclusion, our study underscores the role of SQTs in recognizing signals during the ECM presymbiotic stage and in regulating plant growth.

Figure 11. 

Schematic diagram illustrates the dependence of Suillus bovinus volatile organic compounds (VOCs) induced lateral root formation on auxin signaling pathways. Orange dots in the figure represent VOCs released by S. bovinus. In the table, a “√” indicates that the VOCs, α-humulene or β-cedrene, rely on the specific auxin pathway to stimulate plant root growth. A “-” means the induction is independent of that pathway, while a “?” denotes uncertainty about the pathway’s involvement. Genes listed in parentheses indicate their role in the process by which S. bovinus VOCs promote root growth via the corresponding pathway. A gene marked with an “×” in parentheses signifies its non-participation in this process. Pm: Pinus massoniana; At: Arabidopsis thaliana.

Additional information

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Ethical statement

No ethical statement was reported.

Adherence to national and international regulations

All the fungal strains used in this study have been legally obtained, respecting the Convention on Biological Diversity (Rio Convention).

Funding

This research was supported by the Guizhou Provincial Science and Technology Projects (QKHZHYD[2024]044), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32360372 and 31971572) and the Cultivation Project of Guizhou University [2020]47.

Author contributions

WYF was involved in the formal analysis, investigation, methodology, writing – original draft, review and editing. GYY was involved in the investigation. XGS was involved in conceptualization, funding acquisition, methodology, supervision, writing – review and editing. GJD was involved in supervision, funding acquisition, writing – review and editing.

Author ORCIDs

Wanyan Feng https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5645-6742

Xueguang Sun https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7895-6702

Guiyun Yuan https://orcid.org/0009-0005-5345-4238

Guijie Ding https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5760-0425

Data availability

The original data presented in this study are included in the article/Suppl. material 1. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

References

  • Bach TJ, Lichtenthaler HK (1982) Mevinolin: a highly specific inhibitor of microsomal 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase of radish plants. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung C 37(1–2): 46–50. https://doi.org/10.1515/znc-1982-1-209
  • Bais HP, Fall R, Vivanco JM (2004) Biocontrol of Bacillus subtilis against infection of Arabidopsis roots by Pseudomonas syringae is facilitated by biofilm formation and surfactin production. Plant Physiology 134(1): 307–319. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.103.028712
  • Beauregard PB, Chai Y et al. (2013) Bacillus subtilis biofilm induction by plant polysaccharides. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110(17): E1621–E1630. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1218984110
  • Chen H, Quan W et al. (2022) Effects of Suillus luteus and S. bovinus on the physiological response and nutrient absorption of Pinus massoniana seedlings under phosphorus deficiency. Plant and Soil 471(1–2): 577–590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-021-05211-5
  • Daguerre Y, Plett JM, Veneault-Fourrey C (2016) Signaling pathways driving the development of ectomycorrhizal symbiosis. In: Martin F (Ed.) Molecular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Hoboken, UK John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 141–157. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118951446.ch9
  • Ditengou FA, Mueller A et al. (2015) Volatile signalling by sesquiterpenes from ectomycorrhizal fungi reprogrammes root architecture. Nature Communications 6: 6279. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7279
  • Felten J, Kohler A et al. (2009) The ectomycorrhizal fungus Laccaria bicolor stimulates lateral root formation in poplar and Arabidopsis through auxin transport and signaling. Plant Physiology 151(4): 1991–2005. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.109.147231
  • Feng W, Sun X, Ding G (2022) Morphological and transcriptional characteristics of the symbiotic interaction between Pinus massoniana and Suillus bovinus. Journal of Fungi 8(11): 1162. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8111162
  • Garcia K, Delaux P et al. (2015) Molecular signals required for the establishment and maintenance of ectomycorrhizal symbioses. New Phytologist 208(1): 79–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13423
  • Gupta PK, Durzan DJ (1985) Shoot multiplication from mature trees of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) and sugar pine (Pinus lambertiana). Plant Cell Reports 4: 177–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00269282
  • He A, Zhao L et al. (2023) A volatile producing Bacillus subtilis strain from the rhizosphere of Haloxylon ammodendron promotes plant root development. Plant and Soil 486(1): 661–680. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-023-05901-2
  • Hernández-Calderón E, Aviles-Garcia ME et al. (2018) Volatile compounds from beneficial or pathogenic bacteria differentially regulate root exudation, transcription of iron transporters, and defense signaling pathways in Sorghum bicolor. Plant Molecular Biology 96(3): 291–304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11103-017-0694-5
  • Hill RA, Wong Bajracharya J et al. (2022) Abscisic acid supports colonization of Eucalyptus grandis roots by the mutualistic ectomycorrhizal fungus Pisolithus microcarpus. New Phytologist 233(2): 966–982. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.17825
  • Li Y, Shao J et al. (2022) The volatile cedrene from Trichoderma guizhouense modulates Arabidopsis root development through auxin transport and signaling. Plant, Cell & Environment 45: 969–984. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.14230
  • Liu S, Xie J et al. (2024) Papiliotrema flavescens, a plant growth-promoting fungus, alters root system architecture and induces systemic resistance through its volatile organic compounds in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology Bioch 208: 108474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2024.108474
  • Lofgren L, Nguyen NH et al. (2024) Suillus: an emerging model for the study of ectomycorrhizal ecology and evolution. New Phytologist 242: 1448–1475. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.19700
  • Martin FM, van Der Heijden MG (2024) The mycorrhizal symbiosis: research frontiers in genomics, ecology, and agricultural application. New Phytologist 242: 1486–1506. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.19541
  • Mashiguchi K, Tanaka K et al. (2011) The main auxin biosynthesis pathway in Arabidopsis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108(45): 18512–18517. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1108434108
  • Marx DH (1969) The influence of ectotrophic fungi on the resistance of pine root to pathogenic infections. I. Antagonism of mycorrhizal fungi to root pathogenic fungi and soil bacteria. Phytopathology 59: 153–163.
  • Minerdi D, Bossi S et al. (2011) Fusarium oxysporum and its bacterial consortium promote lettuce growth and expansin A5 gene expression through microbial volatile organic compound (mVOC) emission. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 76(2): 342–351. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2011.01051.x
  • Moisan K, Cordovez V et al. (2019) Volatiles of pathogenic and non–pathogenic soil-borne fungi affect plant development and resistance to insects. Oecologia 190(3): 589–604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-019-04433-w
  • Ning C, Egerton-Warburton LM et al. (2021) Shifts in ectomycorrhizal fungal community composition during the early establishment of native and exotic pine seedlings. Applied Soil Ecology 157: 103722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2020.103722
  • Pacifici E, Polverari L, Sabatini S (2015) Plant hormone cross-talk: the pivot of root growth. Journal of Experimental Botany 66(4): 1113–1121. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eru534
  • Pellegrin C. Martin F, Veneault-Fourrey C (2019) Molecular signalling during the ectomycorrhizal symbiosis. In: Hoffmeister D, Gressler M (Eds) Biology of the fungal cell. Switzerland: Springer, Cham, 95–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05448-9_6
  • Peng L, Shan X et al. (2021) Facultative symbiosis with a saprotrophic soil fungus promotes potassium uptake in american sweetgum trees. Plant, Cell & Environment 44(8): 2793–2809. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.14053
  • Pérez-Flores P, Valencia-Cantero E et al. (2017) Bacillus methylotrophicus M4-96 isolated from maize (Zea mays) rhizoplane increases growth and auxin content in Arabidopsis thaliana via emission of volatiles. Protoplasma 254(6): 2201–2213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-017-1109-9
  • Perez-Pazos E, Certano A et al. (2021) The slippery nature of ectomycorrhizal host specificity: Suillus fungi associated with novel pinoid (Picea) and abietoid (Abies) hosts. Mycologia 113(5): 891–901. https://doi.org/10.1080/00275514.2021.1921525
  • Plett JM, Wojtalewicz D et al. (2024) Sesquiterpenes of the ectomycorrhizal fungus Pisolithus microcarpus alter root growth and promote host colonization. Mycorrhiza 34(1): 69–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-024-01137-9
  • Qin YY, Gong Y et al. (2024) Aerial signaling by plant-associated Streptomyces setonii WY228 regulates plant growth and enhances salt stress tolerance. Microbiological Research 286: 127823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2024.127823
  • Rodríguez-Concepción M (2006) Early steps in isoprenoid biosynthesis: multilevel regulation of the supply of common precursors in plant cells. Phytochemistry Reviews 5: 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11101-005-3130-4
  • Rudawska M, Wilgan R et al. (2018) Shifts in taxonomical and functional structure of ectomycorrhizal fungal community of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) underpinned by partner tree ageing. Pedobiologia 71: 20–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedobi.2018.08.003
  • Smith SE, Read DJ (2008) Mycorrhizal symbiosis. Academic Press, London, UK.
  • Splivallo R, Fischer U et al. (2009) Truffles regulate plant root morphogenesis via the production of auxin and ethylene. Plant Physiology 150(4): 2018–2029. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.109.141325
  • Sun J, Xu Y et al. (2009) Arabidopsis ASA1 is important for jasmonate-mediated regulation of auxin biosynthesis and transport during lateral root formation. Plant Cell 21(5): 1495–1511. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.108.064303
  • Sun L, Cao M et al. (2020) The volatile organic compounds of Floccularia luteovirens modulate plant growth and metabolism in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant and Soil 456: 207–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-020-04709-8
  • Sun X, Feng W et al. (2019) Phenology and cultivation of Suillus bovinus, an edible mycorrhizal fungus, in a Pinus massoniana plantation. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 49(8): 960–968. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2018-0405
  • Tahir HAS, Gu Q et al. (2017) Effect of volatile compounds produced by Ralstonia solanacearum on plant growth promoting and systemic resistance inducing potential of Bacillus volatiles. BMC Plant Biology 17(1): 133. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-017-1083-6
  • Tyagi S, Kim K et al. (2019) Volatile dimethyl disulfide affects root system architecture of Arabidopsis via modulation of canonical auxin signaling pathways. Environmental Sustainability 2(2): 211–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42398-019-00060-6
  • van Der Heijden MGA, Martin FM et al. (2015) Mycorrhizal ecology and evolution: the past, the present, and the future. New Phytologist 205(4SI): 1406–1423. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13288
  • Wang K, Lin Z et al. (2023) Identification and surveys of promoting plant growth VOCs from biocontrol bacteria Paenibacillus peoriae GXUN15128. Microbiology Spectrum 11(3): E4322–E4346. https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.04346-22
  • Wang S, Na X et al. (2021) Bacillus megaterium strain ww1211 promotes plant growth and lateral root initiation via regulation of auxin biosynthesis and redistribution. Plant and Soil 466: 491–504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-021-05055-z
  • Yamagiwa Y, Inagaki Y et al. (2011) Talaromyces wortmannii FS2 emits β-caryphyllene, which promotes plant growth and induces resistance. Journal of General Plant Pathology 77(6): 336–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10327-011-0340-z
  • Zamioudis C, Mastranesti P et al. (2013) Unraveling root developmental programs initiated by beneficial Pseudomonas spp. Bacteria. Plant Physiology 162(1): 304–318. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.112.212597
  • Zhang C, Yu Z et al. (2022) Serratia marcescens PLR enhances lateral root formation through supplying PLR-derived auxin and enhancing auxin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Journal of Experimental Botany 73(11): 3711–3725. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erac074
  • Zhou ZX (2001) Chinese Masson Pine. China Forestry Press, Beijing, China.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 

Supplementary tables and figures

Wanyan Feng, Xueguang Sun, Guiyun Yuan, Guijie Ding

Data type: docx

Explanation note: table S1: Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) of symbiotic fungi. table S2: Growth of Pinus massoniana under different treatments. fig. S1: Volatile organic compound (VOC) localization experiment. fig. S2: Analysis of fungal volatile organic compounds (VOCs) produced by Suillus bovinus (Sb), Suillus luteus (Sl), Scleroderma citrinum, and Phialocephala fortinii. fig. S3: Proportion of Pinus massoniana seedling roots infected by Suillus bovinus under different treatments. NM, uninoculated seedlings (control); M, seedlings inoculated with S. bovinus.

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Download file (1.29 MB)
login to comment