Research Article |
Corresponding author: Yi Li ( liyi062@yzu.edu.cn ) Corresponding author: Yi-Jian Yao ( yaoyj@sun.im.ac.cn ) Academic editor: Jennifer Luangsa-ard
© 2025 Yi Li, Jiao-Jiao Lu, Ya-Bin An, Lan Jiang, Hai-Jun Wu, Ke Wang, Dorji Phurbu, Jinmei Luobu, Chao Ma, Rui-Heng Yang, Cai-Hong Dong, Yi-Jian Yao.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Li Y, Lu J-J, An Y-B, Jiang L, Wu H-J, Wang K, Phurbu D, Luobu J, Ma C, Yang R-H, Dong C-H, Yao Y-J (2025) An attempt of DNA barcodes based geographical origin authentication of the Chinese caterpillar fungus, Ophiocordyceps sinensis. IMA Fungus 16: e144783. https://doi.org/10.3897/imafungus.16.144783
|
Ophiocordyceps sinensis is one of the best-known traditional Chinese medicines with distribution confined to the Tibetan Plateau and its surrounding regions. Harvesting the fungus contributes greatly to the livelihood of local communities. The quality and price varies amongst different production regions, usually resulting in an intentional mix-up of its production locality during trading processes, which leads to a demand of developing a reliable way that can trace the geographical origin of this fungus. In the present study, a DNA barcoding-based method applying two universal DNA barcodes for identifying fungal and insect, respectively i.e. the nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I (COI), was evaluated and used for geographical origin authentication of O. sinensis. A total of 24 ITS and 78 COI haplotypes were recognised from 215 individuals collected from 75 different geographic localities (county level). Ninety-nine haplotypes were defined using the combination of ITS and COI, discriminating the 75 investigated production counties into 99 distinct regions. A “core” production region was recognised which covers areas of Nagqu and Qamdo in Xizang, Yushu and Guoluo in Qinghai, Gannan (Maqu and Xiahe) in Gansu and certain regions in Nyingch (Bomi and Zayü) and Lhasa (Damxung) in Xizang and Garzê (Sêrxü) in Sichuan Province. Haplotype analyses using the combined barcodes of ITS and COI showed an excellent performance in the geographical origin authentication of O. sinensis and the definition of “core” and “non-core” production region.
Barcoding, biodiversity, COI, ITS, Tibetan Plateau
Ophiocordyceps sinensis (Berk.) G.H. Sung, J.M. Sung, Hywel-Jones & Spatafora [≡ Cordyceps sinensis (Berk.) Sacc.] (
Due to the increasing demand and the significant decrease in wild resources, the price of natural O. sinensis products has increased sharply during the past three decades. It has become the most precious fungus worldwide and the top-rated products are even sold at a price higher than gold. Collecting and trading the fungus has become one of the most important income sources for local communities in production areas (
Due to the host specificity and the limitations of its living conditions, O. sinensis is confined to the alpine shrub and alpine meadow areas on the Tibetan Plateau and its surrounding regions, usually found at altitudes from above 3,000 m to the snow line (
Although significant genetic variance was observed within this species (
Up to now, different technologies have been developed for geographical origin authentication for this fungus, including using a near-infrared reflectance (NIR) spectroscopy analysis of the methanol extracts (
DNA barcoding is a rapid, accurate and cost-effective species identification method (
Since DNA from both the fungus and its host insects can be obtained from single individuals, a better resolution would be achieved if the combined ITS and COI data were used rather than using a single barcode. In this study, the ITS and COI sequences were obtained from a total of 215 sample individuals collected from 75 different counties of five production provinces and haplotypes were defined and used for geographical origin authentication of this precious fungus. The results would not only provide valuable information for geographical origin authentication, but also benefit conservation of this species.
A total of 215 individuals were included in this study representing 75 different geographic localities (county level). These samples were collected from 14, 43, 13, 3 and 2 counties in the provinces of Qinghai (111), Xizang (74), Sichuan (19), Gansu (9) and Yunnan (2) (Suppl. material
Total genomic DNA was extracted from dried specimens using the modified CTAB method (
ITS and COI sequences were sequenced in both directions and assembled with SeqMan 6.1 module of the Lasergene (DNA Star Inc. WI, USA) software package. Primer sequences were excluded and ambiguous base pairs (bp) were manually checked and edited, based on sequencing chromatograms in BioEdit 7.0.9.1 (
Representative sequences of all identified haplotypes were aligned with ClustalW (
BI Bayesian Inference
bp Base pair
BS Bootstrap support
COI Cytochrome c oxidase subunit I
COII Cytochrome c oxidase subunit II
CTAB Cetyl trimethylammonium bromide
Cytb Cytochrome b
GTR + G General time reversible model with gamma distributed substitution rates
ITS Internal transcribed spacer
ML Maximum Likelihood
NIR Near-infrared reflectance
PCR Polymerase chain reaction
PP Posterior probabilities
RAPD Random amplified polymorphic DNA
UV Vulnerable
The lengths for ITS and COI sequences were 580 bp and 1009 bp, respectively, after excluding primers. According to DAMBE analyses, 24 ITS haplotypes (F01–F13, F15–F17, F19–F26) were recognised from 215 O. sinensis specimens. The haplotypes F01 and F02 were the two most dominant ITS, represented by 123 (57.2%) and 44 (20.5%) individuals. Other ITS haplotypes were represented by 1–10 individuals (Suppl. material
The host insects showed greater diversity than the parasite fungus, with 78 COI haplotypes being recognised. A total of 20, 41, 15, 4 and 2 COI haplotypes were identified from 111, 74, 19, 9 and 2 individuals collected from Qinghai, Xizang, Sichuan, Gansu and Yunnan, respectively (Suppl. material
Combined haplotypes were also defined using both ITS and COI sequences. A total of ninety-nine combined haplotypes have been identified. The four most abundant combined haplotypes were F01H02, F01H03, F01H04 and F02H01. F01H02 was represented by 33 individuals from four counties (Darlag, Gadê, Maqên and Zadoi) in Guoluo Prefecture in Qinghai, accounting for 15.3% of the total sampling. F01H03 was represented by 16 individuals collected from Guoluo in Qinghai (15) and Xiahe in Gansu (1), accounting for 7.4% of the total individuals. F01H04 was represented by 13 individuals (accounting for 7.0%) collected from 10 counties of Qinghai and Xizang. F02H01 was represented by 40 individuals which were collected from one county of Gansu (Minle) and seven counties of Qinghai (Gangca, Menyuan, Qilian, Huzhu, Gonghe, Tianjun, Datong), accounting for 18.6% of the included samples (Suppl. material
A representative individual for each haplotype was selected to construct phylogenetic relationships. The BI consensus tree showed a similar topology to the best-scoring ML tree for both fragments (ITS and COI), but had higher supporting values for each clade (Fig.
Phylogenetic trees constructed by ITS (A) and COI (B) haplotypes. ITS and COI sequences from the same individuals are connected with lines. The dashed lines are Ophiocordyceps laojunshanensis. The pink, green, blue and red solid lines represent the four most abundant ITS haplotypes F01, F02, F03 and F04, respectively. Numbers above branches are Bayesian posterior probabilities shown as percentages (left) and bootstrap values calculated from the ML analysis of 1000 replicates (right). Haplotypes in a highlighted box are those delimited as representing “core” production regions in this study. The number of specimens of each haplotype sequenced is given in brackets. The yellow highlighted ITS (F01) and COI (H03) haplotypes are identical to the epitype designated by Li et al. (2021).
The core production refers to those regions that produce the Chinese caterpillar fungus with high qualities. Since the Chinese caterpillar fungus is a product of the parasitism of larvae of ghost moths (Hepialidae) by O. sinensis, the quality may be associated with the genetic diversity of both the fungus and its host insects. It is quite reasonable to use ITS and COI to determine the core and non-core production regions. In comparison, it is difficult to delimit which haplotypes could represent the “core” in the practical implementation. According to our field experiences with the vast production areas during the past 20 years, it is generally considered that the adjacent regions of Qinghai and Xizang produce fungus of higher quality than other areas. Thus, the main haplotypes identified from those areas were considered hallmarks of the “core” production. Further, the “core” haplotypes should also meet the requirement that they are from the core clades in the ITS and COI phylogenetic trees. According to these criteria, the core ITS haplotypes are F01, F04, F07, F19 and F23 and the core COI haplotype includes H02–H04, H15–H17, H23, H24, H28, H32, H33, H36, H51, H59, H67–H72, H74–H76 and H78 (Fig.
Geographical origin authentication of the Chinese caterpillar fungus in county level.
Distribution (county level) | ITS haplotypes | COI haplotypes | Combined haplotypes | Sample size | Classification | Core production determination |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gansu, Gannan, Maqu | F01 | H23, H24 | F01H23, F01H24 | 2 | Unique | core |
Gansu, Gannan, Xiahe | F01 | H03 | F01H03 a | 1 | Shared | core |
Gansu, Zhangye, Minle | F02 | H01 | F02H01 a | 6 | Shared | non-core |
Qinghai, Guoluo, Darlag | F01, F02 | H02, H06 | F01H02 b, F02H06 | 3 | 1 Unique+1 Shared | mixed |
Qinghai, Guoluo, Gadê | F01 | H02 | F01H02 b | 3 | Shared | core |
Qinghai, Guoluo, Maqên | F01, F07 | H01, H02, H03, H06, H52, H67, H68, H69, H70, H71, H72, H73, H74 | F01H01, F01H02b, F01H03a, F01H06, F01H52, F01H67, F01H68, F01H69, F01H70, F01H71, F01H72, F01H73, F01H74, F07H02, F07H03 | 57 | 13 Unique+2 Shared | mixed |
Qinghai, Haibei, Gangca | F02 | H01 | F02H01 ab | 3 | Shared | non-core |
Qinghai, Haibei, Menyuan | F02, F13 | H01, H22 | F02H01 ab, F13H22 | 4 | 1 Unique+1 Shared | non-core |
Qinghai, Haibei, Qilian | F02 | H01 | F02H01 ab | 12 | Shared | non-core |
Qinghai, Haidong, Huzhu | F02, F05, F10 | H01, H53 | F02H01 ab, F02H53, F05H01, F10H01 | 7 | 3 Unique+1 Shared | non-core |
Qinghai, Haidong, Ledu | F23 | H18 | F23H18 | 1 | Unique | non-core |
Qinghai, Haidong, Minhe | F01 | H54 | F01H54 | 1 | Unique | non-core |
Qinghai, Hainan, Gonghe | F02 | H01 | F02H01 ab | 5 | Shared | non-core |
Qinghai, Haixi, Tianjun | F02, F05, F17 | H01, H25, H26 | F02H01 ab, F05H25, F17H26 | 8 | 2 Unique+1 Shared | non-core |
Qinghai, Xining, Datong | F02 | H01 | F02H01 ab | 3 | Shared | non-core |
Qinghai, Xining, Huangzhong | F01 | H18 | F01H18 | 1 | Unique | non-core |
Qinghai, Yushu, Zadoi | F01 | H02, H04 | F01H02 b, F01H04a | 3 | Shared | core |
Sichuan, Aba, Heishui | F05 | H19 | F05H19 | 1 | Unique | non-core |
Sichuan, Aba, Hongyuan | F03 | H19 | F03H19 | 1 | Unique | non-core |
Sichuan, Aba, Xiaojin | F06, F08, F15 | H08, H12 | F06H08, F08H08, F08H12, F15H08 | 5 | Unique | non-core |
Sichuan, Aba, Zamtang | F02 | H55 | F02H55 | 1 | Unique | non-core |
Sichuan, Garzê, Baiyü | F01, F03 | H61, H62 | F01H62, F03H61 | 2 | Unique | non-core |
Sichuan, Garzê, Batang | F01, F02 | H63, H64 | F01H63, F02H64 | 2 | Unique | non-core |
Sichuan, Garzê, Dawu | F06 | H20 | F06H20 | 1 | Unique | non-core |
Sichuan, Garzê, Dêgê | F01 | H60 | F01H60 | 1 | Unique | non-core |
Sichuan, Garzê, Garzê | F01 | H58 | F01H58 | 1 | Unique | non-core |
Sichuan, Garzê, Luhuo | F01 | H57 | F01H57 | 1 | Unique | non-core |
Sichuan, Garzê, Sêrtar | F01 | H56 | F01H56 | 1 | Unique | non-core |
Sichuan, Garzê, Sêrxü | F02 | H59 | F01H59 | 1 | Unique | core |
Sichuan, Garzê, Yajiang | F01 | H65 | F01H65 | 1 | Unique | non-core |
Xizang, Lhasa, Chengguan | F01 | H11 | F01H11 b | 2 | Shared | non-core |
Xizang, Lhasa, Damxung | F01 | H33 | F01H33 | 1 | Unique | core |
Xizang, Lhasa, Doilungdêqên | F01 | H37 | F01H37 | 1 | Unique | non-core |
Xizang, Lhasa, Lhünzhunb | F01 | H34 | F01H34 | 1 | Unique | non-core |
Xizang, Lhasa, Maizhokunggar | F01, F16 | H12, H14 | F01H14, F16H12 | 3 | Unique | non-core |
Xizang, Lhasa, Nyêmo | F01 | H05 | F01H05 b | 1 | Shared | non-core |
Xizang, Nagqu, Baqên | F01 | H15, H29 | F01H15 , F01H29 | 2 | 1 Unique+1 Shared | mixed |
Xizang, Nagqu, Biru | F01 | H04, H13, H15, H28 | F01H04 ab, F01H13, F01H15, F01H28 | 5 | 1 Unique+3 Shared | mixed |
Xizang, Nagqu, Lhari | F01 | H13, H30 | F01H13 , F01H30 | 2 | 1 Unique+1 Shared | non-core |
Xizang, Nagqu, Seni | F01 | H04, H16, H17 | F01H04 ab, F01H16, F01H17b | 4 | 1 Unique+2 Shared | core |
Xizang, Nagqu, Nyainrong | F01, F07 | H04 | F01H04 ab, F07H04 | 2 | 1 Unique+1 Shared | core |
Xizang, Nagqu, Sog | F01 | H04 | F01H04 ab | 1 | Shared | core |
Xizang, Nyingch, Bomi | F01 | H04, H17, H75 | F01H04 ab, F01H17b, F01H75 | 3 | 1 Unique+2 Shared | core |
Xizang, Nyingch, Gongbo′gyamda | F03 | H46 | F03H46 | 1 | Unique | non-core |
Xizang, Nyingch, Mainling | F11, F12, F21 | H09, H49, H50 | F11H49, F12H09, F21H50 | 3 | 2 Unique+1 Shared | non-core |
Xizang, Nyingch, Langxian | F20, F26 | H05, H48 | F20H48, F26H05 | 2 | Unique | non-core |
Xizang, Nyingch, Bayi | F11, F12, F22, F25 | H09, H27 | F11H27, F12H09, F22H09, F25H09 | 4 | 3 Unique+1 Shared | non-core |
Xizang, Nyingch, Zayü | F01, F03 | H04, H76, H51 | F01H04 ab, F01H76, F03H51 | 3 | 2 Unique+1 Shared | mixed |
Xizang, Qamdo, Baxoi | F01 | H04 | F01H04 ab | 1 | Shared | core |
Xizang, Qamdo, Dêngqên | F01 | H04, H78 | F01H04 ab, F01H78 | 2 | 1 Unique+1 Shared | core |
Xizang, Qamdo, Gonjo | F01 | H35 | F01H35 | 1 | Unique | non-core |
Xizang, Qamdo, Jomda | F01 | H40 | F01H40 | 1 | Unique | non-core |
Xizang, Qamdo, Lhorong | F01 | H36 | F01H36 | 1 | Unique | core |
Xizang, Qamdo, Riwoqê | F01 | H04 | F01H04 ab | 2 | Shared | core |
Xizang, Qamdo, Zhag′yab | F01 | H32 | F01H32 | 1 | Unique | core |
Xizang, Qamdo, Zogang | F01 | H38, H39 | F01H38, F01H39 | 2 | Unique | non-core |
Xizang, Shannan, Comai | F01 | H07 | F01H07 | 1 | Unique | non-core |
Xizang, Shannan, Cona | F04 | H07 | F04H07 | 1 | Unique | non-core |
Xizang, Shannan, Gyaca | F01, F03, F04 | H10 | F01H10, F03H10, F04H10 | 3 | Unique | non-core |
Xizang, Shannan, Lhozhag | F04 | H45 | F04H45 | 1 | Unique | non-core |
Xizang, Shannan, Lhünzê | F03 | H07, H77 | F03H07 b, F03H77 | 2 | 1 Unique+1 Shared | non-core |
Xizang, Shannan, Nêdong | F04 | H05 | F04H05 b | 1 | Shared | non-core |
Xizang, Shannan, Qusum | F03 | H05, H07 | F03H05, F03H07b | 2 | 1 Unique+1 Shared | non-core |
Xizang, Shannan, Zhanang | F01 | H05 | F01H05 b | 1 | Shared | non-core |
Xizang, Xigazê, Dinggyê | F04 | H44 | F04H44 | 1 | Unique | non-core |
Xizang, Xigazê, Gamba | F01 | H05 | F01H05 b | 1 | Shared | non-core |
Xizang, Xigazê, Gyirong | F19 | H43 | F19H43 | 1 | Unique | non-core |
Xizang, Xigazê, Lhazê | F04 | H05 | F04H05 b | 1 | Shared | non-core |
Xizang, Xigazê, Namling | F01 | H05 | F01H05 b | 1 | Shared | non-core |
Xizang, Xigazê, Nyalam | F01 | H41 | F01H41 | 1 | Unique | non-core |
Xizang, Xigazê, Tingri | F01 | H42 | F01H42 | 1 | Unique | non-core |
Xizang, Xigazê, Samzhubzê | F01, F09 | H11, H31 | F01H11 b, F09H31 | 2 | 1 Unique+1 Shared | non-core |
Xizang, Xigazê, Yadong | F09 | H47 | F09H47 | 1 | Unique | non-core |
Yunnan, Diqing, Dêqên | F24 | H66 | F24H66 | 1 | Unique | non-core |
Yunnan, Lijiang, Yulong | F03 | H21 | F03H21 | 1 | Unique | non-core |
Sampling sizes, haplotype numbers and core/non-core definition for each province. Red shadow indicates the “core” production region, green coloured shadow indicates the “non-core”. Sector graph shows the proportion of the core and non-core region in county level, the yellow colour indicates “mixed” county which contains both the core and non-core production region. The line chart in the lower left corner shows the number of sampling sizes, ITS, COI and the combined haplotypes for each province.
For the geographical origin authentication, twenty-four ITS haplotypes discriminated 24 different production areas and 78 COI haplotypes differentiated 78 production regions. Considering that one ITS haplotype may correspond to more than one (1–52) COI haplotype and, on the other hand, one COI haplotype could also correspond to more than one (1–4) ITS haplotype, the combination of ITS and COI (combined haplotype) could discriminate more. Finally, as many as 99 production regions were separated using the combined haplotype. One combined haplotype may represent different numbers (1–10) of production regions (in the county level). For example, the most widely distributed haplotype, F01H04 (one of the core haplotypes) was observed from 10 counties, including one from Qinghai (Zadoi, Yushu) and nine from Xizang, i.e. Biru, Seni, Nyainrong and Sog in Nagqu, Bomi and Zayü in Nyingch, Baxoi, Dêngqên and Riwoqê in Qamdo, whereas most combined haplotypes (81 amongst 99) were only observed in one county (Table
The qualities of traditional Chinese medicine from different producing regions vary due to the differences in effective medicinal components. Environmental factors such as climate, soil, biology and topography may significantly impact the growth and formation of medicinal materials, resulting in variance in quality amongst production regions. Besides, the intrinsic genetic differences amongst geographic populations may also be critical for the quality and the ‘geo-herbalism’ of medical materials. The quality of the Chinese caterpillar fungus was mainly evaluated by its present appearance, primarily the specimen’s size, colour and smell. The geographic production regions were usually supposed to be highly related to those extrinsic characteristics, causing an intentional mislabelling of the production locality during the trading process and a strong desire for the authentication of its geographical origin as a result.
Using the combination of the universal DNA barcodes for fungi (ITS) and host insects (COI), 99 combined haplotypes were recognised, which discriminated 75 investigated production counties into 99 regions. If administrative regionalisation were considered, the combined haplotypes could determine the production region to provincial level in nearly all cases with only a very few exceptions observed, i.e. Xiahe County of Gannan, Gansu shared the same haplotype F01H03 with Maqên County of Guoluo, Qinghai; Minle County of Zhangye, Gansu shared haplotype F02H01 with seven counties around Qinghai Lake (Datong, Gangca, Gonghe, Huzhu, Menyuan, Qilian, Tianjun); Zadoi County of Yushu, Qinghai shared haplotype F01H04 with the other nine Xizang counties (Baxoi, Biru, Bomi, Dêngqên, Seni, Nyainrong, Riwoqê, Sog, Zayü) (Table
Amongst all the 75 counties investigated in this study, 39 (52%) possessed a unique combined haplotype, which means samples from those counties could be traced; 18 (24%) counties contained both unique and shared haplotypes, those counties possibly being traced if the detected samples had the unique haplotypes, or not able to be traced if shared haplotypes were seen; the remaining 18 (24%) shared haplotypes with other counties, in other words, samples from those counties could not be accurately traced to a particular county, but to a corresponding area. It is noteworthy that all counties of Yunnan (2) and Sichuan (13) possessed unique haplotypes, the number of haplotypes ranging from 1 to 5, depending on the sample sizes (Table
Up to now, a total of 32 ITS haplotypes have been identified from our own collections, amongst which eight ITS haplotypes (
In the present study, 215 individuals (specimens) from 75 counties were included, covering nearly half of the confirmed (113) and possible (55) distribution sites at the county level (
This study indicates that the host insects are more diverged than the fungus, with a total number of 78 COI haplotypes being recognised. Host insect’s diversity and complexity could be attributed to their unique life history and habitat isolation. The adult ghost moths cannot fly long distances and survive only 3–8 days (
The price of O. sinensis varies greatly amongst different production regions even with the same exterior quality, while natural products from different localities are hardly being distinguished from their appearance, resulting in confusion during trading processes. It leads to the demand of a reliable way to trace the geographical origin of this fungus. The present study developed a DNA barcoding-based method which uses ITS and COI, i.e. two universal DNA barcodes for identifying fungal and insect species, respectively. As many as 24 ITS and 78 COI haplotypes were recognised from 215 individuals that were collected from 75 different geographic localities (county level) and ninety-nine combined haplotypes were defined using both ITS and COI. The combined haplotype analysis showed an excellent performance in the geographical origin authentication of the fungus, discriminating the 75 investigated production counties into 99 distinct regions. Additionally, haplotype analysis was also found capable to define the “core” and “non-core” production regions.
Y.L. is grateful to Caidanzhuoma and Gang Zhang in Nagqu Inspection and Testing Center for providing assistant in specimen collecting.
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
No ethical statement was reported.
Not applicable.
This work was supported by the 2021 Nagqu City Regional Science and Technology Collaborative Innovation Project (QYXTZX-NQ2022-05), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32170001) and the High Level Talents Support Program of Yangzhou University.
Y.L. and Y-J.Y. conceived the idea and designed the research; Y.L., Y-B.A., D.P., J.L., C.M., R-H.Y. and C-H.D. participated in fieldwork; Y.L., J-J.L., L.J., H-J.W. and K.W. conducted laboratory work; Y.L. and J-J.L. wrote the initial draft of the manuscript; Y.L., C-H.D. and Y-J.Y. designed the project, acquired funding and revised the initial manuscript.
Yi Li https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3482-5487
Jiao-Jiao Lu https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0916-8294
Lan Jiang https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4097-1341
Ke Wang https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5153-8498
Chao Ma https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9509-4489
Rui-Heng Yang https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5442-9388
Cai-Hong Dong https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2558-3404
Yi-Jian Yao https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7158-2963
All the sequences obtained in this study have been deposited in GenBank (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) under the accession nos. OR652460–OR652582 and OR669738–OR669952 for ITS and COI, respectively. The ITS and COI alignments have been made open-access through TreeBase and could be accessed through the link http://purl.org/phylo/treebase/phylows/study/TB2:S31885.
Sampling sizes, haplotype numbers and core/non-core definition for each provinces
Data type: xlsx
Specimen information and haplotype classification of Ophiocordyceps sinensis used in this study
Data type: xlsx