Research Article
Print
Research Article
Pseudobaeosporoideae, a new subfamily within the Tricholomataceae for the genus Pseudobaeospora (Agaricales, Tricholomatineae) based on morphological and molecular inference
expand article infoAlfredo Vizzini, Giovanni Consiglio§, Katarína Adamčíková|, Ledo Setti, Slavomír Adamčík#¤
‡ University of Torino, Torino, Italy
§ Unaffiliated, Casalecchio di Reno (Bologna), Italy
| Institute of Forest Ecology, Slovak Academy of Sciences Zvolen, Nitra, Slovakia
¶ Unaffiliated, Suzzara (Mantova), Italy
# Institute of Botany, Plant Science and Biodiversity Center, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovakia
¤ Comenius University in Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovakia
Open Access

Abstract

Based on molecular and morphological evidence the new subfamily Pseudobaeosporoideae of the Tricholomataceae is established within the Tricholomatineae for accommodating the unique features of Pseudobaeospora such as gymnocarpic mycenoid/collybioid habit, small-sized spores with thick and dextrinoid wall, and presence of crassobasidia. Twenty-six Pseudobaeospora collections corresponding to eleven species (five types) were newly sequenced. Collections morphologically attributable to P. oligophylla (type of the genus) or to P. pillodii are here sequenced for the first time: accordingly, P. oligophylla is considered as a posterior synonym of P. pillodii. Quélet’s original plate is selected as a lectotype for Collybia pillodii and a French collection as its epitype collection. Pseudobaeospora deceptiva is described as a new species from Italy very close to P. pillodii from which it differs mainly by bigger spores and SSU and LSU rDNA sequences. The presence of P. pyrifera in Italy is documented for the first time and P. mutabilis is reduced to its later synonym. A neotype is established for P. jamonii which is here proved to be an independent species. Finally, a critical review of the characters used for interspecific distinctions in Pseudobaeospora was provided.

Key words:

Agaricomycetes, Basidiomycota, Pseudobaeospora, taxonomy, Tricholomataceae, Tricholomatoid clade

Introduction

Pseudobaeospora Singer (Singer 1942), is a genus first established to encompass only a single species, Baeospora oligophylla Singer (Singer 1938), a small violet agaric from Central Asia (Altai Mountains in Russian Federation). Pseudobaeospora was differentiated from the amyloid-spored genus Baeospora Singer mainly by its small, thick-walled and dextrinoid mature spores (Singer 1942, 1951). Afterwards, several new species have been described or placed in the genus Pseudobaeospora all around the world (e.g., Singer 1963, 1969; Horak 1964; Wasser 1980; Rawla and Arya 1991; Aberdeen 1992; Bas 2002, 2003; Arnolds et al. 2004; Desjardin 2004; Vellinga 2009; Schwarz 2012; Desjardin et al. 2014; Wu et al. 2017; Voto and Soop 2018; Craig et al. 2023). Many of these species have not yet been studied molecularly to support their actual placement as members of the genus. One of the most obvious cases of species misclassification is that of P. lamingtonensis Aberdeen from Australia (Aberdeen 1992) which, as pointed out by Voto (2009) and Craig et al. (2023), due to the presence of an annulus is a lepiotoid fungus and belongs in Agaricaceae Chevall.

For several decades until 1995, only two taxa were known from Europe (Bas 1995), viz. P. oligophylla (Singer) Singer (1951) and P. pillodii (Quél.) Wasser (1980), which were later synonymized on morphological basis (Horak 1964, 1968; Redhead 1982; Ronikier and Moreau 2007; Voto 2021). The concept of the genus was later emended by Bas (2003) to accommodate not only species with a pileipellis of a cutis type but also those with a pluristratous hymeniderm/ cellulodermic/epithelioid or trichodermic types and species with basidiome surfaces changing colour in KOH. Then, over a few years, many new European species have been described (Bas 1996, 1998, 2002, 2003; Bas et al. 1997, 2002; Bas and Krieglsteiner 1998; Adamčík and Bas 2002; Arnolds et al. 2003; Adamčík and Ripková 2004a; Clémençon and Ayer 2007; Voto 2009, 2018; Adamčík and Jančovičová 2011; Arauzo 2011a, b), mostly on a morphological basis. Pseudobaeospora currently includes around 36 species from temperate, subtropical, and tropical regions in Europe, North and South America, central and southern Asia, Africa (see a collection named Tricholoma sp. from Cameroon KR819126, sister to P. lilacina, in Craig et al. 2023) and Oceania (Australia, Papua New Guinea) (Bas 2002; Voto 2021, https://www.ameronlus.it/chiavi_micologia.php; Craig et al. 2023). These species occur in habitats from sea level to the subalpine (or even alpine) zone, most of these are very rare and only known from very few collections and areas (Bas 2003; Voto 2021).

Thus far, intrageneric classifications and species circumscriptions in Pseudobaeospora have relied on morphological characters, mainly on colours of the basidiomes, the differences in the structure of the pileipellis, reactions of the pileus surface in KOH or ammonia, the presence or absence of clamp-connections and hymenial cystidia (cheilocystidia), and spore sizes and shapes (Bas 2002, 2003; Adamčík et al. 2007; Voto 2009, 2018, 2021).

The taxonomic position of Pseudobaeospora has long been uncertain. Singer (1942) initially placed the genus in Tricholomataceae R. Heim ex Pouzar s.l. (subfamily ’Marasmioideae’ Kauffman), but soon afterwards transferred it to Agaricaceae Chevall. (followed by Locquin 1952, Horak 1964, and Wasser 2002), at first in tribus Lepioteae Fayod close to Lepiota (Pers.) Gray section Sericellae Kühner (Singer 1951, 1963) and later in tribus Cystodermateae Singer (Singer 1986). However, Kühner (1980) retained the genus in Tricholomataceae, a placement supported and/or accepted by subsequent researchers on a morphological basis (e.g., Bas 1995, 2003; Bon 1999; Adamčík et al. 2007; Vellinga 2009; Voto 2009; Arauzo 2011a, b; Morozova and Popov 2013), although this placement is questioned by Bon (1999), who hypothesized affinities also with the Mycenaceae Overeem. In the first pioneering works of the molecular era, the genus has not been included in the analysis of the Agaricales Underw. by Moncalvo et al. (2000, 2002) and Matheny et al. (2006). Vellinga (2003, 2004) showed that P. pyrifera is not part of the Agaricaceae. In subsequent molecular phylogenetic analyses, based on a poor taxon sampling of Pseudobaeospora species/collections and not including the type species, the genus showed affinity with Callistosporium Singer (Wu et al. 2017), more specifically Callistosporiaceae Vizzini, Consiglio, M. Marchetti & P. Alvarado (Vizzini et al. 2020a) or Tricholomataceae s.s. (Desjardin et al. 2014; Sánchez-García and Matheny 2017; He et al. 2019; Sánchez-García et al. 2020, 2021; He and Yang 2022) as delimited by Sánchez-García et al. (2014). Both these families belong to the suborder Tricholomatineae Aime, Dentinger & Gaya of the Agaricales (Dentinger et al. 2015; He and Yang 2022; Vizzini et al. 2024).

The aim of the present study is: I) to specify a phylogenetic placement of the genus Pseudobaeospora by a multigene analysis of the suborder Tricholomatineae (= Tricholomatoid clade in the sense of Matheny et al. 2006) using a larger taxon sampling for Pseudobaeospora than previous studies and including for the first time its type species (P. oligophylla = P. pillodii); II) to use this multi-loci sampling for the reconstruction of phylogenetic relationships within Pseudobaeospora and the circumscription of the genus; III) to confirm identity of recent Italian collections with morphological similarities to P. pyrifera (a species so far known only from Germany, The Netherlands, Spain, Russia, France and Slovakia; Bas and Krieglsteiner 1998; Bas 2003; Chaillet et al. 2007; Arauzo 2011a, b; Morozova and Popov 2013; Caillet et al. 2018; Caboň et al. 2021) providing a morphological and molecular phylogenetic circumscription; and IV) to define taxonomic position and circumscription of some Pseudobaeospora species based on new sequence and morphological data obtained from authentic material and supplemented by recent collections.

Material and methods

Morphological analysis

Macromorphological features of P. deceptiva and P. pyrifera were described from fresh specimens. Colour terms in capital letters (e.g., Deep Vinaceous, Plate XXVII) are those of Ridgway (1912). L = number of lamellae reaching the stipe, l = number of lamellulae between each pair of lamellae. The microscopic structures in both fresh and dried materials were examined, in different mountants: water, L4 [7.2 g KOH, 160 mL glycerine, 840 mL dH2O, 7.6 g NaCl and 5 mL Invadin (Ciba-Geigy), Clémençon 1972], Melzer’s reagent, ammoniacal Congo red, and Cotton blue (Singer 1986; Largent and Baroni 1988). Dried fragments of basidiomes were rehydrated in water and observed in L4. All microscopic measurements were carried out under oil immersion at ×1000 with a Zeiss Axioscope 40 compound microscope.

Spore measurements were made by photographing all the spores (taken from the hymenophore of mature specimens) occurring in the visual field of the microscope using Mycomètre software (Fannechère 2011). Spore length, width, and length/width ratio (Q) were measured with exclusion of the hilar appendix and are given as: (minimum–) average minus standard deviation – average – average plus standard deviation (–maximum). The approximate spore volume (V in μm3) was calculated as that of an ellipsoid (Gross 1972; Meerts 1999) and provided with the same statistics as the other spore parameters. The notation ‘n/m/p’ provided after spore measurements in descriptions indicates that measurements were made on ‘n’ randomly selected spores from ‘m’ basidiomes of ‘p’ collections. The width of the basidia was measured at the widest part, and the length was measured from the apex (sterigmata excluded) to the basal septum.

Microscopic pictures were taken on a Canon PowerShot A640 digital camera connected to a Zeiss Axioscope 40 compound microscope with both interferential contrast and phase-contrast optics. Herbarium (Fungarium) acronyms follow Thiers (2025). Author citations are from Index Fungorum (http://www.indexfungorum.org/authorsoffungalnames.htm).

DNA extraction, amplification, and sequencing

Total DNA was extracted from thirty dry specimens (Suppl. material 1) employing a modified protocol based on Murray and Thompson (1980) or using the E.Z.N.A. Fungal DNA Mini Kit (Omega Bio-Tek, Inc., Norcross, GA, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The following loci were targeted: (i) the internal transcribed spacer regions of nuclear ribosomal DNA (nrITS), (ii) nuclear ribosomal large subunit (nrLSU), (iii) the most variable region between domains 6 and 7 of the nuclear gene encoding the second largest subunit of RNA polymerase II (RPB2), (iv) translation elongation factor EF-1 alpha (TEF1) and (v) 18S ribosomal RNA (SSU). Primers ITS1F and ITS4 (White et al. 1990; Gardes and Bruns 1993) were employed for the ITS rDNA region, NS19b and NS41 or NS1 and NS4 for SSU (White et al. 1990; Gardes and Bruns 1993; Hibbett 1996), while LR0R and LR5 (Vilgalys and Hester 1990; Cubeta et al. 1991) were used to amplify the LSU/28S rDNA region, EF1-728F, EF1-983F, EF1-1567R and EF1-2218R (Carbone and Kohn 1999; Rehner and Buckley 2005) for the TEF1 gene, and bRPB2-6F2 (reverse of bRPB2-6R2), bRPB2-7.1R2, bRPB2-7R2, bRPB2-6F and bRPB2-7.1R for the RPB2 gene (Matheny et al. 2007). Amplification of DNA was performed using a PCR mix consisting of approximately 2 ng/μl of template DNA, forward and reverse primers (10 pmol/μl), 5× HOT FIREPol® Blend Master Mix (Solis BioDyne, Tartu, Estonia) and molecular grade water added up to 20 μl. PCR products were checked in 1% agarose gels, and positive reactions were sequenced with one or both PCR primers. Chromatograms were checked searching for putative reading errors, and these were corrected.

Phylogenetic analysis

BLAST (Altschul et al. 1990) was used to select the most closely related sequences from public databases (INSDC/GenBank https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/, UNITE https://unite.ut.ee/, and BOLD http://www.boldsystems.org/). Three different alignments were built. (1) First, a combined alignment including SSU rDNA, LSU rDNA, TEF1 (introns excluded) and RPB2 (introns excluded) sequences from representative species of the major lineages in the Tricholomatineae found in previous phylogenetic studies (Matheny et al. 2006; Sánchez-García et al. 2014, 2016, 2021; Bellanger et al. 2015; Alvarado et al. 2015, 2018a, b; Sánchez-García and Matheny 2017; Raj et al. 2019; Vizzini et al. 2020a, 2024; He and Yang 2022; He et al. 2023). (2) Second, a combined alignment of nrITS, SSU rDNA, LSU rDNA, and RPB2 (introns excluded) included data of Tricholomataceae s.s. and Pseudobaeospora following Sánchez-García et al. 2014, 2016, 2021; Sánchez-García and Matheny (2017), Corriol and Jargeat (2019), He and Yang (2022) and He et al. (2023). 3) Third, an alignment of all the studied Pseudobaeospora collections was supported by ITS sequences retrieved from the public databases (also including the environmental sequences) following Wu et al. (2017), Gisotti et al. (2021) and Craig et al. (2023). Suillus pictus (Peck) Kuntze, Ampulloclitocybe clavipes (Pers.) Redhead, Lutzoni, Moncalvo & Vilgalys, Pseudoarmillariella ectypoides (Peck) Singer, and Tricholoma inamoenum (Fr.) Gillet were used as outgroup taxa for the first and third alignments, respectively. Rooting was done in FigTree v.1.4.0. (http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/). The Tricholomataceae s.s. phylogeny was midpoint-rooted.

Sequences (Suppl. material 1) were first aligned in MEGA 6.0 (Tamura et al. 2013) software with its MUSCLE application (Edgar 2004) and then edited manually. Some ambiguously aligned regions, which were characterised by uncertain positions and the presence of introns, were excluded from subsequent analyses (Criscuolo and Gribaldo 2010).

The Bayesian analyses (BI) were performed through the CIPRES Science Gateway platform (Miller et al. 2010) by using the MrBayes v. 3.2.7 algorithm with ITS, LSU and SSU rDNA, TEF1, RPB2 data partitioned, two simultaneous runs, four chains, temperature fixed at 0.2 and sampling every 1000 generations until reaching the convergence parameters (standard deviation less than 0.01). The first 25% trees were discarded as burn-in. Bayesian analyses reached convergence after 4.530 M (Tricholomatineae), 4.860 M (Tricholomataceae s.s.), and 1.250 M (Pseudobaeospora) generations. Finally, a full search for the best-scoring Maximum likelihood tree was performed in RAxML v.8.2.10 (Stamatakis 2014) using the standard search algorithm (data partitioned as in Bayesian analysis, GTRGAMMA model, 1000 bootstrap replications). As both Bayesian and Maximum likelihood analyses produced similar topologies, only the Bayesian trees with both PP (posterior probability) and ML BP (bootstrap proportions) values were shown (Figs 13). Significance threshold was set to PP ≥ 0.95 and ML BP ≥ 70%.

Figure 1. 

Bayesian inference phylogram built with nucleotide sequence data of four loci (nrLSU, nrSSU, RPB2-exons and TEF1-exons) of the main lineages inside the suborder Tricholomatineae of the order Agaricales, rooted with Suillus pictus (Boletales), Ampulloclitocybe clavipes and Pseudoarmillariella ectypoides (Hygrophorineae, Agaricales) as outgroups. Nodes were annotated with Bayesian PP (left) and ML BP (right) values, with the significance threshold considered as Bayesian PP ≥ 0.95 and/or ML BP ≥ 70%. Subsignificant support values were annotated in parentheses. All family-level clades, except for Tricholomataceae, were collapsed. Boldface names represent samples sequenced for this study.

Figure 2. 

Mid-point rooted Bayesian phylogeny (nrITS, nrLSU, nrSSU, RPB2-exons) of the Tricholomataceae s.s. Nodes were annotated with Bayesian PP (left) and ML BP (right) values, with the significance threshold considered as Bayesian PP ≥ 0.95 and/or ML BP ≥ 70%. Subsignificant support values were annotated in parentheses. Boldface names represent samples sequenced for this study.

Figure 3. 

Bayesian inference phylogram built with ITS nucleotide sequence of Pseudobaeospora, rooted with Tricholoma inamoenum (Tricholomataceae) as outgroup. Nodes were annotated with Bayesian PP (left) and ML BP (right) values, with the significance threshold considered as Bayesian PP ≥ 0.95 and/or ML BP ≥ 70%. Subsignificant support values were annotated in parentheses. Boldface names represent samples sequenced for this study. Clades are named following Craig et al. (2023).

Abbreviations

BI : Bayesian inference

CHEGD fungi: Clavariaceae, Hygrophoraceae, Entolomataceae, Geoglossaceae and Dermoloma

DNA : deoxyribonucleic acid

INSDC : International Nucleotide Sequence Database Collaboration

nrITS : nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer

nrLSU : nuclear ribosomal large subunit ribosomal DNA

nrSSU : nuclear ribosomal small subunit ribosomal DNA

ML : Maximum likelihood

ML BP : Maximum likelihood bootstrap proportion

PCR : Polymerase Chain Reaction

PP : posterior probability

RPB2 : DNA-directed RNA polymerase II subunit 2 gene

SEM : scanning electron microscope

TEF1-α : translation elongation factor 1-α gene

UNITE : User-friendly Nordic ITS Ectomycorrhizal Database.

Results

Molecular phylogeny

A total of 26 Pseudobaeospora collections (5 types included) corresponding to 11 species, 3 Lepista collections [L. caespitosa (Bres.) Singer, L. densifolia (J. Favre) Singer & Clémençon, L. glaucocana (Bres.) Singer] and Pseudoporpoloma pes-caprae (Fr.) Vizzini & Consiglio collection were sequenced (Suppl. material 1). The final multigenic alignment of the Tricholomatineae is composed of 236 OTUs (collections) and contained 2988 total nucleotide positions: 872 positions from LSU/28S rDNA (236 sequences), 847 positions from SSU/18S rDNA (119 sequences), 514 positions from TEF1 (77 sequences) and 755 positions from RPB2 (165 sequences). The final multigenic alignment of the Tricholomataceae s.s. is composed of 137 OTUs and contained 3912 total nucleotide positions: 564 positions from ITS rDNA (137 sequences), 872 positions from LSU/28S rDNA (92 sequences), 1718 positions from SSU/18S rDNA (44 sequences) and 758 positions from RPB2 (51 sequences). The final alignment of Pseudobaeospora is composed of 90 OTUs and contained 517 from ITS rDNA total nucleotide positions. Data of all collections used in the phylogenetic analyses are listed in the Suppl. material 1.

In the molecular phylogeny of Tricholomatineae (Fig. 1), the Tricholomataceae were recovered as monophyletic with strong support (PP 1.00, ML BP 96%). Tricholomataceae were sister to Callistosporiaceae (PP 1.00, ML BP 72%) as previously pointed out by He et al. (2023) and Vizzini et al. (2024). The Pseudobaeospora clade was strongly supported (PP 1.00, ML BP 77%). This clade is sister (PP 1.00, ML BP 96%) to the clade formed by the remaining taxa of the Tricholomataceae (= core of the Tricholomataceae, PP 0.91, ML BP 53%) which encompasses another nine monophyletic genus-rank clades corresponding to Albomagister Sánchez-García, Birkebak & Matheny, Corneriella Sánchez-García, Dennisiomyces Singer, Dermoloma J.E. Lange ex Herink, Leucopaxillus Boursier, Porpoloma Singer s.s., Pseudoporpoloma Vizzini & Consiglio, Pseudotricholoma (Singer) Sánchez-García & Matheny and Tricholoma (Fr.) Staude. The non-collapsed phylogenetic tree is available as Suppl. material 2. The same topology was recovered in the phylogeny of Tricholomataceae s.s. although the Dermoloma and Pseudoporpoloma relationships remain unresolved (Fig. 2).

In the phylogenetic analysis of the Pseudobaeospora ITS alignment (Fig. 3), two major sister clades within the studied genus were recognized, viz. the P. pyrifera clade and the P. pillodii clade (= P. calcarea clade sensu Craig et al. 2023), as previously unveiled by Craig et al. (2023). Pseudobaeospora brunnea and several environmental sequences are outside the two clades. Six species clades are identified by a position of sequence from type material within the P. pyrifera clade, i.e., P. pyrifera Bas & L.G. Krieglst., P. jamonii Bas, Lalli & Lonati, P. wipapatiae Desjardin, Hemmes & B.A. Perry, P. deckeri C.F. Schwarz, P. lilacina X.D. Yu, Ming Zhang & S.Y. Wu and P. taluna S. Craig, L.J. Vaughan & T.W. May. Type of P. mutabilis Bas & Adamčík and additional authentic material of the species clustered within a single species-rank clade with sequences of P. pyrifera and this is also supported by multigene analysis (Fig. 2), therefore we propose P. mutabilis to be its later synonym. All of these species clades with more than one sample were strongly supported. In addition, sequences identified as P. stevensii Desjardin (PP 1.00, ML BP 100%) and P. cyanea Arnolds, Tabarés & Rocabruna (PP 1.00, ML BP 100%) are placed in two highly supported species-rank clades. A well-defined species is also probably represented by a clade of Portuguese environmental sequences sister to P. jamonii (PP 1.00, ML BP 92%) which corresponds to UNITE species hypothesis SH0004636. A topotypical collection of P. laguncularis var. denudata Bas (LIP PAM99101004 FR2013079, France) occupied an uncertain position within the P. pyrifera clade. There was a large cluster of sequences from Australian collections (PP 0.95, ML BP 42%) which probably represents at least two undescribed species. In addition, four singletons with very distant geographical origins (Cameroon, Mexico, Seychelles, USA) probably represent additional undescribed species.

Within the P. pillodii clade, samples sequenced in this study are placed in three species clades and one singleton. In addition, we retrieved four independent singletons which may represent distinct species from public databases. Holotype and authentic material of P. terrayi Adamčík & Jančovič. are clustered with sequences identified as P. calcarea Clémençon & Ayer (Fig. 3), but conspecificity of these names can only be confirmed when P. calcarea holotype is also sequenced. European collections of P. celluloderma Bas in the P. celluloderma clade are sister to a sequence from a USA collection (KU058501, TENN 067659), suggesting that the latter probably represent a different species (P. aff. celluloderma). A pair of two sequences from Italian collections was nested within P. pillodii sequences in the ITS tree (Fig. 3) but is clearly supported as distinct species in the multigene analysis where also their SSU and LSU sequences are present (Fig. 2). This clade was described as P. deceptiva sp. nov. here.

In summary, we estimated that our ITS dataset represents ca. 36 species globally, of which 13 are European. Fifteen species in our analyses had assigned names, of which nine are European. More than 46% of potential species included in our ITS analyses are represented by a single sample and approximately 58% of species are probably representing new undescribed species.

Taxonomy

Tricholomataceae section Pseudobaeosporoideae Vizzini, Consiglio & Setti, subfam. nov.

MycoBank No: 857522

Diagnosis.

Basidiomes agaricoid (pileostipitate), gymnocarpic (no veils), mostly mycenoid or rarely collybioid, homogeneous (context of stipe and pileus continuous), hymenophore lamellate, lamellae adnexed, decurrent with a tooth to almost free or free, spore deposit white to whitish, basidiospores usually smooth, when mature usually thick-walled, non-amyloid, often weakly to strongly dextrinoid, basidia non-siderophilous, sometimes thick-walled and sclerified (wall 1–3 µm thick, crassobasidia or sclerobasidia) and dextrinoid, hymenophoral trama regular to subregular, hymenial cystidia absent or present as cheilocystidia, rarely as pleurocystidia, caulocystidia usually present, pileipellis a cutis to trichoderm or pluristratous hymeniderm/epithelium/celluloderm, pileocystidia-like elements rare, clamp-connections present or absent, hyphal system monomitic. Terrestrial, trophic mode unknown, presumably saprotrophic or forming an unspecified symbiotic interaction with vascular plants.

Type of the subfamily.

Pseudobaeospora Singer, Lloydia 5: 129 (1942).

Type of the genus.

Baeospora oligophylla Singer, Revue Mycol., Paris 3(4–5): 194 (1938) = Collybia pillodii Quél. [as ‘pillodi’], C. r. Assoc. Franç. Avancem. Sci. 18(2): 509 (1890).

Representative genus.

Pseudobaeospora .

Notes.

The subfamily is currently monogeneric and is sister to the core of the Tricholomataceae [Tricholomataceae subfam. Tricholomatoideae (Singer) Bon] (Figs 1, 2) within the Tricholomatineae. Pseudobaeospora is circumscribed by small mycenoid (e.g., P. celluloderma) to collybioid white-spored basidiomes [indicatively, pileus 1.5–30 mm in diam., stipe 10–55(–70) × 0.5–3.0 mm]; pileus frequently with pale to dark lilac, violaceous, purple, blue tinges, hemispherical, obtusely conical or paraboloid to plano-convex or plano-conical (campanulate); lamellae adnexed, emarginate, or decurrent with a tooth to free, usually more or less concolorous with pileus; stipe pruinose to fibrillose, often rooting, at base mostly with white to rarely yellow tomentum and rhizomorphs; basidiospores small (from 2.5 µm to rarely more than 6.5 µm long), subglobose to broadly ellipsoid, colorless, smooth (minutely rugulose under SEM in P. wipapatiae Desjardin, Hemmes & B.A. Perry, Desjardin et al. 2014), pore-less, with very distinct, abrupt hilar appendage, at first thin-walled and non-amyloid, then becoming thick-walled and weakly to strongly dextrinoid, congophilous, cyanophilous, and rather frequently more or less metachromatic in Cresyl blue (e.g., P. paulochroma Bas, P. bavariae Bas); basidia 4-spored to 2-spored, or 4- and 2-spored in the same basidiome, often with a basal clamp-connection, without inner siderophilous granulations, scattered sclerified (thick-walled) dextrinoid basidia (sclerobasidia, crassobasidia following Singer and Clémençon 1972, Watling and Chandra 1983, and Clémençon 2004) often present; pleurocystidia usually lacking (rarely present, e.g., P. aciculifera Voto & Soop, P. cyanea, P. taluna) and cheilocystidia present in some species, in one case with amyloid contents (P. wipapatiae); hymenophoral trama regular to somewhat irregular, with elements in central part (mediostratum) often inflated; pileipellis varying from a simple cutis or cutis-trichoderm to a trichoderm in some species to an irregular pluristratous hymeniderm/epithelium/ /celluloderm in others; some terminal elements could be differentiated as pileocystidia; hyphae thin-walled, not or slightly gelatinized; pigments predominantly parietal (sometimes also hyphae with minute extracellular incrustations) but also intracellular (vacuolar or cytoplasmatic); in 5% KOH pileipellis fragments usually changing colour or becoming violet, green, yellow or brownish with such tinges, rarely first red then yellow-green; in several species pseudotissues more or less dextrinoid; caulocystidia usually present at least at stipe apex, thin-walled, scattered to clustered; clamp-connections usually present in several or all tissues, rare in P. calcarea, in one species restricted to basidia and subhymenium (P. frieslandica Bas) or absent (e.g., P. pillodii).

The species show a terrestrial habit, usually on needle carpets of conifers, forest litter, wooden debris, humus, deeply hidden among/on mosses and grasses but also sometimes on bare soil (Bas 2002, 2003). Their trophic status remains unknown, presumably saprotrophic, non-ectomycorrhizal (Bas 2002, 2003; not reported in Rinaldi et al. 2008, Tedersoo et al. 2010, and Tedersoo and Smith 2013). As noted by Ronikier and Moreau (2007), most species appear to prefer calcareous and/or nutrient-rich soils, but some are found on peaty soils.

The unique combination of small-sized mycenoid to collybioid basidiomes often with lilac violet tinges, pileipellis usually positively reacting with KOH, presence of scattered dextrinoid thick-walled basidia and small-sized spores becoming secondarily thick-walled and dextrinoid makes this genus easily identifiable and delimitable. Thickening spore walls becoming dextrinoid typically occurs also in the genus Rhodocollybia Singer (Omphalotaceae Bresinsky, Marasmiineae Aime, Dentinger & Gaya) (Antonín and Noordeloos 1997, 2010) and is considered a generic character. Rhodocollybia however differs in larger spores, larger basidiomes with a simple ixocutis, absence of crassobasidia, a pinkish yellow to pinkish brown, never white spore deposit, and a different (contradictory) trophic habit, viz. putatively EcM (Pera and Alvarez 1995; Mleczko 2004; Schirkonyer et al. 2013) to facultatively biotrophic saprobe (secondary colonizers of senescent EcM root tips, Tedersoo et al. 2010; Tedersoo and Smith 2013).

Crassobasidia (non-dextrinoid) are occasionally present in different suborders of Agaricales: Armillaria (Fr.) Staude and Xerula Maire/Hymenopellis R.H. Petersen (Physalacriaceae Corner) within Marasmiineae (Singer and Clémençon 1972; Watling and Chandra 1983; Watling 1992; Clémençon 2004; Antonín and Dvořák 2010; Petersen and Hughes 2010); Amanita Pers. (Amanitaceae E.-J. Gilbert) within Pluteineae Aime, Dentinger & Gaya (Kotilová-Kubičková and Pouzar 1988; Tulloss and Halling 1997); Clavaria stellifera J. Geesink & Bas, Camarophyllopsis Herink s.l. and Ramariopsis (Donk) Corner (Clavariaceae Chevall.) within Clavariineae Olariaga, Huhtinen, Læssøe, J.H. Petersen & K. Hansen (Singer 1986; Geesink and Bas 1992; Halama et al. 2017); Crepidotus (Fr.) Staude (Crepidotaceae (S. Imai) Singer) and Inocybe (Fr.) Fr. s.l. (Inocybaceae Jülich) within Agaricineae Fr. (Kuyper 1986; Senn-Irlet 1995); Calocybella Vizzini, Consiglio & Setti (Lyophyllaceae Jülich), Fayodia Kühner (Fayodiaceae Jülich), Dermoloma J.E. Lange ex Herink (Tricholomataceae) and Entoloma (Fr.) P. Kumm. (Entolomataceae Kotl. & Pouzar), within Tricholomatineae (Singer 1986; Arnolds 1993; Horak and Desjardin 1993; Manimohan et al. 1995; Latha et al. 2020). Their presence is a generic character only for Armillaria and Camarophyllopsis s.l. (Singer 1986).

The microchemical reaction, 5% KOH pileipellis fragments which commonly become blue green is reminiscent of that exhibited by some Gymnopus (Pers.) Gray species allied with G. alkalivirens (Singer) Halling (Halling 1979, 1981, 1990; Antonín and Noordeloos 1997, 2010) (Omphalotaceae, Marasmiineae), Xerophorus (Bon) Vizzini, Consiglio & M. Marchetti (Vizzini et al. 2020a) (Callistosporiaceae Vizzini, Consiglio, M. Marchetti & P. Alvarado, Tricholomatineae) and Leucoagaricus Locq. ex Singer/Leucocoprinus Pat. species (Agaricaceae, Leucocoprineae Singer, Bon 1993; Vellinga et al. 2010; Asif et al. 2024; Kooij et al. 2024; Yang et al. 2024).

With the exclusion of Pseudobaeospora (Tricholomataceae subfam. Pseudobaeosporoideae) from the family core Tricholomataceae (Tricholomataceae subfam. Tricholomatoideae) the latter subfamily is thus restricted to species characterized by a mostly tricholomatoid or rarely tricholomatoid-collybioid habit (Dennisiomyces, Dermoloma), with smooth or verrucose (Leucopaxillus) non-dextrinoid and thin-walled basidiospores, whose walls usually react in grey or blue to Melzer’s reagent (immediately amyloid, Albomagister partim, Dermoloma subg. Amylospora Adamčík, Corneriella, Dennisiomyces, Leucopaxillus, Porpoloma, Pseudoporpoloma and Pseudotricholoma; latently amyloid, Tricholoma; see Moreau et al. 2015; Vizzini et al. 2016, 2020b, 2024; Corriol and Jargeat 2018; Sánchez-García et al. 2021; Matheny et al. 2024).

Pseudobaeospora pillodii (Quél.) Wasser, Flora Gribov Ukrainy. Agarikoyve Griby (Kiev): 220 (1980)

Figs 4d, g, 5, 6

Pseudobaeospora pillodii (Quél.) E. Horak, Revue Mycol., Paris 29(1–2): 73 (1964), Nom. inval., Art. 41.3 (Shenzhen Code).

Collybia pillodii Quél. [as ‘pillodi’] Basionym, C. r. Assoc. Franç. Avancem. Sci. 18(2): 509 (1890) [1889].

= Pseudobaeospora oligophylla (Singer) Singer, Lilloa 22: 438 (1951) [1949].

Baeospora oligophylla Singer, Basionym, Revue Mycol., Paris 3(4–5): 194 (1938).

= ? Agaricus (Tricholoma) microsporus Ellis sensuDesjardin (2004) non sensuSinger (1942).

Lectotype of Collybia pillodii.

(selected here, MBT10024681): Quélet’s original plate, 1890, C.R. Ass. franç. Av. Sci. 18: pl. XV, fig. 4. Fig. 4g

Epitype of Collybia pillodii.

(designated here, MBT10024682): FRANCE • Savoie, Bourg-Saint-Maurice, Arc 1800, under Alnus alnobetula (Ehrh.) K. Koch, 27 August 2006, leg. P-A Moreau (LIP PAM06082703).

Selected iconography.

Ludwig (2000: 152, 70.1); Ronikier and Moreau (2007: 1b, c); Morozova and Popov (2013: pl. I-1); Christan and Rexer (2020: 41).

Selected descriptions.

Kühner and Romagnesi (1954: 92, as Collybia pillodii); Horak (1968: 511–513, as P. oligophylla); Redhead (1982: 217, as P. pillodii, no data on presence/absence of clamp-connections); Bas (2003: 192–193, as P. pillodii, 194–195 as P. oligophylla); Morozova and Popov (2013: 129–130, as P. pillodii, in Russian).

Description.

Spores (2.8–)3.3–3.7–4.2(–5.6) × (2.5–)2.9–3.1–3.4(–4.2) µm (288/5/5), Q = (0.96–)1.07–1.19–1.32(–1.69), V = (10.2–)14.6–19.8–25.0(–46.1) μm3, globose to subglobose or broadly ellipsoid in frontal and side view, wall up to 0.2–0.3 µm thick, smooth, colorless in L4; hilar appendix prominent, 0.5–0.8 µm long (Fig. 6c–f). Basidia 16–17.5 × 5–6 µm, mostly tetraspored but also bispored, clavate, sterigmata up to 5 µm long. Hymenophoral trama regular to subregular, consisting of up to 8 µm wide hyphae, colorless in L4. Hymenial cystidia absent. Pileipellis suprapellis as a quite compact (dense) cutis of broadly ellipsoid up to 16 µm wide hyphae mixed with cylindrical, up to 8 µm wide hyphae, with rounded apex, slightly gelatinized, smooth, sometimes ascendant and forming small trichodermic patches; subpellis formed by broadly ellipsoid, densely septate hyphae up to 10 µm wide (Fig. 5a–h). Pigments brownish, intracellular. Stipitipellis of cylindrical, up to 6 µm wide hyphae (Fig. 6a). Stipititrama of up to 16 µm wide hyphae. Caulocystidia usually present, clustered, versiform, thin-walled, colorless, up to 6 µm wide (Fig. 6b). Clamp-connections absent everywhere.

Specimen examined.

FRANCE • Savoie, Bourg-Saint-Maurice, Arc 1800, under Alnus alnobetula (Ehrh.) K. Koch, 27 August 2006, leg. P-A Moreau (LIP PAM06082703, epitype of C. pillodii). NORWAY • Innlandet, Lesja, Joris delta, Flommarkskog med gråor, 12 August 2021, leg. T.E. Brandrud, S. Khalsa & P.G. Larsen (O-F:258872). POLAND • Western Tatra Mts., Sarnia Skala massif, northern slope, at the top, alt. 1375 m, Pinetum mugi carpaticum, on litter, 22 August 2001, leg. A. Ronikier (KRAM-F:53298); ibidem, 8 September 2001, leg. A. Ronikier (KRAM-F:53314). RUSSIA • Republic of Karachay-Cherkessia, Teberda State Nature Reserve, Dzhemagat Gorge, 1881 m, on the soil on the border of floodplain forest and meadow, 13 August 2009, leg. E.S. Popov, det. O.V. Morozova (LE 254346).

Notes.

Collybia pillodii was described and illustrated by the French mycologist Lucien Quélet (1890) from Jura hills as a very small entirely violet species with a campanulate to convex pruinose pileus, whitish pileus margin, adnate and distant lamellae paler than the pileus, a fistulous and slender rooting stipe bristling at the base with white and radiant rhizoids, very thin violaceous context, and minute subglobose to ovoid spores. He reported its spores as minutely aculeate (“finement aculeolée”), but his observation was probably incorrect because it was not confirmed by all the subsequent authors who observed always smooth spores. The species was later described in detail by Kühner and Romagnesi (1954), who suggested its possibly placement in Tricholoma section Liposperma. Favre (1960) believed that the species was better placed within the tribe Orcellées (see below) in sense of Kühner (see Kühner and Romagnesi 1953, Kühner 1969 = Entolomataceae).

When Singer (1938) described Baeospora oligophylla he did not compare it to Collybia pillodii described 48 years earlier by Quélet (1890). He merely noted that the latter species probably also belongs to the genus Baeospora Singer. Then, when Singer (1942) established the genus Pseudobaeospora for the species of Baeospora with dextrinoid spores, he included only B. oligophylla. Both in the first and in second edition of “The Agaricales in modern taxonomy” (Singer 1951, 1962), he placed the genus Pseudobaeospora as closely related to Lepiota (following the suggestions by Locquin 1952), and still monotypic with a single species, P. oligophylla; while Collybia pillodii was classified as a probable member of Collybia section Iocephalae Singer.

The two species were placed together in one genus for the first time by Horak (1964), who made an invalid combination Pseudobaeospora pillodii, validated later by Wasser (1980). In the third and fourth editions of “The Agaricales in modern taxonomy”, Singer (1975, 1986) also followed Horak’s opinion including the two names in one genus.

Since type collections of Quélet’s Collybia pillodii and of Baeospora oligophylla (presumably kept in LE) do not exist (Olga Morozova, pers. comm.) and their very concise original descriptions are difficult to interpret there has been some speculation about the relation between P. pillodii and P. oligophylla and depending on the authors these taxa were treated as two independent species (Singer 1986; Bas 2002, 2003) or just one (Horak 1964, 1968, 2005; Redhead 1982; Ronikier and Moreau 2007; Morozova and Popov 2013; Desjardin et al. 2014; Voto 2021).

Bas (2003) was the only author who provided a comparison of P. pillodii and P. oligophylla. He mainly relied on his own collections, the original description of P. oligophylla (Singer 1938), the exhaustive descriptions of Collybia pillodii by Kühner (in Kühner and Romagnesi 1954) and of the Swiss specimens of P. pillodii by Horak (1968). He distinguished P. oligophylla by a cutis type of pileipellis with cystidioid, repent to ascending, terminal elements compared to a simple undifferentiated cutis of P. pillodii. These conclusions were later questioned by Ronikier and Moreau (2007) who, after finding and studying specimens at various stages of development, proposed to consider both taxa as synonyms, giving the priority to P. pillodii as an older name. They concluded that the cutis-like pileipellis observed by Bas as characteristic of P. pillodii is only the tardive stage of the subtrichodermic pileipellis found in young specimens named as P. oligophylla.

Our analyses, which did not take into account the developmental stage of the basidiomes as they were carried out on only herbarium (fungarium) material, show that regardless of the presence or absence of ascending pileocystidioid terminal elements (which in our opinion depends more on the point of the pileus where the sampling is taken) all the collections are molecularly conspecific (Figs 2, 3), and thus supporting the conclusions of Horak (1964, 1968), Redhead (1982), and Ronikier and Moreau (2007). Accordingly, Quélet’s illustration of Collybia pillodii (Quélet 1890) is selected above as lectotype and a sequenced French collection (LIP PAM06082703), also studied in Ronikier and Moreau (2007), is established as epitype of C. pillodii.

According to the results of our study, P. pillodii is characterized by very small to small, very slender (e.g., pileus 1–15 mm wide, stipe 10–55 (70) × 0.2–2.0 mm), brownish lilac, entirely purplish coloured basidiome except its whitish pileus margin, spaced lamellae (L = 12–19, l = 0–3), a non-striate pileus, a stipe with basal rhizoids, subglobose to broadly ellipsoid spores (on average not exceeding 4 µm in length), basidia prevailingly tetrasporic (few specimens have been found with 2-spored basidia only, e.g., Kühner and Romagnesi 1953) as well with 2- and 4- spored basidia sometimes even on one lamella (e.g., Ronikier and Moreau 2007, our observations), cheilocystidia absent (but reported as basidioliform by Horak 1964 or filiform by Singer 1938), suprapellis as a cutis with (subtrichodermoid) or without ascending terminal (pileocystidioid) elements, that is negative to pallid or turns very pale grayish-greenish in KOH, clamp-connections absent. Kühner (in Kühner and Romagnesi 1954) pointed out that all the specimens he examined were haploparthenogenic (apogamic, with uninucleate hyphae).

Pseudobaeospora pillodii was originally described from a deciduous mountain forest (Quélet 1890) and is often reported from Alnus Mill. litter (Kühner in Kühner and Romagnesi 1954; Favre 1960; Bas 2003; Ronikier and Moreau 2007; von Bonsdorff et al. 2012 etc.) as well as from subalpine coniferous litter (Singer 1938; Kühner in Kühner and Romagnesi 1954; Horak 1964, 1968; Bresinsky and Schmid-Heckel 1982; Redhead 1982; Ronikier and Moreau 2007; Læssøe 2008, 2012; Morozova and Popov 2013; Christan and Rexer 2020) or other subalpine plant communities, such as Salix L. shrubs, the Athyrio-Sorbetum association (Bujakiewicz 2004) or Rhododendron L. shrubs (Wasser 1980). As suggested by Ronikier and Moreau (2007), it might be a nitrophilic saprotrophic species, to be sought in other nitrogen-rich organic substrates. It is reported from Asia (Siberia), Europe (France, Germany, Norway, Poland, Switzerland, Russia), and North America (Canada) (Singer 1938; Horak 1964, 1968; Redhead 1982; Bas 2003; Ronikier and Moreau 2007; Læssøe 2008, 2012; Morozova and Popov 2013; Christan and Rexer 2020; Voto 2021). Jamoni (1997) described a Pseudobaeospora collection (on only one basidiome in very poor condition) from subalpine Piedmont (Italy) near Alnus incana which may represent P. pillodii due to its tetrasporic basidia, clampless hyphae and absence of cheilocystidia, but unfortunately the specimen can no longer be found in any fungarium.

There are several interesting observations on P. oligophylla or P. pillodii which were not confirmed by other authors and require further investigation. Favre (1960) and Kühner (1980) reported a lilac-purplish or pinkish spore deposit for P. pillodii. Bon (in Jamoni and Bon 1996) cited some French collections of P. pillodii consisting of only albinotic basidiomes, but these may represent white Pseudobaeospora species which were described later (e.g., Bas 2002, 2003).

For a single collection named P. oligophylla in sense of Bas, the collector, N. Dam, noted that some rhizoids were connected to small ochraceous tubers (presumably sclerotia) in the soil, as in Collybia tuberosa (Bull.) P. Kumm. (cited in Bas 2003; Clitocybaceae Vizzini, Consiglio & M. Marchetti, Tricholomatineae).

The presence of bisporic and/or tetrasporic basidia in basidiomes and/or collections of the same species found in P. pillodii should not be surprising as, apart from P. wipapatiae and Agaricus fuscolilacinus Peck (that according to Desjardin 2004 belongs to Pseudobaeospora) for which only bisporic basidiomes are known (Desjardin 2004; Desjardin et al. 2014), some other species, e.g., P. brunnea, P. cyanea, P. lilacina, show a mixture of (1)2- and 4-spored basidia (Bas 2003; Arauzo 2011a; Wu et al. 2017; Voto 2021), P. pyrifera collections with 2–4 spored basidia and others only 4-spored (see below), and for P. taluna three collections from Tasmania are 4-spored, and one from Victoria, 2-spored (Craig et al. 2023).

Pseudobaeospora pillodii was the only clamp-less species reported from Europe so far before this publication (see below). Pseudobaeospora sp. described in Adamčík and Ripková (2004b) based on a single clamp-less basidiome collected among Molinia sp. under Alnus glutinosa (L.) Gaertn., from Czech Republic, is distinguished mainly by a very minute basidiome (pileus 4.5 mm wide and stipe 20 × 0.6 mm), pileus with 1–1.5 mm long marginal striation, very sparse lamellae (L = 11, l = 0–1), well-developed versiform to irregular cheilocystidia 21–33 × 2.5–6.0 µm, strictly bisporic basidia, a pseudoparenchymatic subpellis of 9–24 µm wide hyphae, and spores longer than 4 µm on average.

Agaricus (Tricholoma) microsporus Ellis (Nom. illegit., Art. 53.1, Shenzhen Code) is, based on the data provided by Desjardin (2004) who examined its holotype collection (“this species forms violet basidiomes with a thin cutis-type pileipellis that overlays a subcellular hypodermium, has dextrinoid basidiospores 4–5 × 3.5–4.5 µm, lacks cheilocystidia, lacks clamp connections, and does not discolor in KOH”), and the original description (Ellis 1874, stipe with “long, spreading, pale-yellowish hairs at base”), a possible older synonym of P. pillodii.

Figure 4. 

Basidiomes of some sequenced Pseudobaeospora collections. a P. calcarea (LIP PAM06090111-FR2013078); b P. cyanea (GDOR M3986); c P. laguncularis var. denudata (LIP PAM99101004-FR2013079); d P. pillodii (KRAM F-53314); e P. terrayi (SAV-F:3317, holotype); f P. terrayi (SAV-F:20813). Lectotype of. C. pillodii; g Quélet’s original plate, pl. XV, fig. 4. Photos: a, c by P.A. Moreau; b by D. Gisotti; d by A. Ronikier; e, f by S. Jančovičová.

Figure 5. 

Pseudobaeospora pillodii , microscopic features. Pileipellis. a–c (KRAM F-53298); d (KRAM F-53314); e, f (LE 254346); g, h (O-F:258872); a–h in ammoniacal Congo red. Scale bars: 10 µm (a–c); 20 µm (e–h). Photos by L. Setti.

Figure 6. 

Pseudobaeospora pillodii , microscopic features. Stipitipellis. a (KRAM F-53298); b (KRAM F-53314). Spores; c (KRAM F-53298); d (KRAM F-53314); e (LE 254346); f (O-F:258872); a–f in ammoniacal Congo red. Scale bars: 10 µm (a); 20 µm (b); 5 µm (c–f). Photos by L. Setti.

Pseudobaeospora deceptiva Vizzini, Consiglio, Setti & Adamčík, sp. nov.

MycoBank No: 857523
Fig. 7

Diagnosis.

Pseudobaeospora deceptiva differs from P. pillodii by larger basidiospores, tetrasporic basidia and lack of rhizoids and from the other members of the genus by its unique phylogenetic position.

Etymology.

the species epithet derives from the Latin word deceptivus (= misleading) and refers to its strong resemblance to P. pillodii.

Holotype (here designated).

ITALY • Abruzzo, Ponte di Platano (CH), on the ground, on rotting leaves of Alnus alnobetula [= A. viridis (Chaix) DC.], 28 August 2000, leg. et det. G. Robich, as P. pillodii (MCVE:15315).

Description.

Habit collybioid. Pileus 5–20 mm broad, conical campanulate to plano-convex, expanding plane with an obtuse umbo, margin at first slightly crenulated-undulate, not striate, flattened to revolute in mature specimens, surface dry, pruinose to minutely felted, not or only slightly hygrophanous, dark violaceous (Dark Bluish Violet, Blackish Violet, Plate X; Navy Blue, Plate XXI; Dusky Violet-Blue 1, Plate XXIII), with a whitish paler margin. Lamellae deeply emarginate with slightly decurrent tooth to almost free, spaced, L = 18–20, 1 = (1–)3–5(–7), rather thick, narrow to ventricose, 1.5–2 mm broad, purple-lilaceous (Pale Amparo Purple, Light Amparo Purple, Plate XI; Light Mallow Purple, Mallow Purple, Plate XII; Pale Vinaceous, Plate XXVII), with a concolorous, entire to slightly irregular/eroded edge. Stipe 40–60 × 1.5–2.5 mm, cylindrical, flexuous, solid to slightly hollow at maturity, not filiform, concolorous with the pileus, at first sparsely but entirely covered by minute silky whitish fibrils and flocks, then evidently fibrillose only at apex (Fig. 7a), base radially strigose. Context violaceous. Pileus surface showing a negative reaction with a drop of 5% KOH. Smell indistinct. Taste mild. Spore-print white.

Spores (3.9–)4.2–4.6–5.0(–5.4) × (2.6–)3.1–3.4–3.8(–4.1) µm (64/2/2), Q = (1.18–)1.25–1.36–1.46(–1.63), V = (15.4–)20.9–28.9–36.8(–46.5) μm3, broadly ellipsoid to ellipsoid, colorless, smooth, in L4; contents granulose or with one or two oil-droplets (guttules), at first thin-walled and inamyloid, but maturing after liberation and becoming thick-walled up to 0.8 µm, dextrinoid, congophilous and cyanophilous; hilar appendix prominent, 0.8–1 µm long (Fig. 7e). Basidia 15–19 × 6–7 µm, clavate, tetrasporic, with sterigmata up to 3 µm long. Hymenophoral trama regular to subregular, consisting of hyphae up to 8 µm wide, colorless in L4. Hymenial cystidia not observed. Pileipellis: slightly gelatinized, a cutis composed of loose, 2.5–4 µm wide hyphae; hyphal terminations towards the pileus margin often ascending and arranged in subtrichodermic patches, subcylindrical, smooth, apically rounded, up to 8 µm wide; subpellis consisting of up to 8 µm wide cylindrical hyphae (Fig. 7b–d). Pigment brownish, intracellular. Stipitipellis consisting of 3–7 µm wide, non-dextrinoid parallel-oriented cylindrical hyphae. Stipititrama similar to stipitipellis structure but hyphae up to 10 wide. Caulocystidia present (observed at stipe apex), 10–40 × 5–10 µm, usually in tufts, thin-walled, colorless, often irregularly shaped, clavate, lageniform, sinuous, lobed, sometimes catenulated, with rounded apex (Fig. 7f). Clamp-connections absent in all parts.

Habitat and distribution.

Terrestrial, so far known only from Italy.

Additional specimen examined.

ITALY • Piemonte, Val d’Otro, Alagna Valsesia (VC), 10 September 1994, leg. et det. P.G. Jamoni, as P. pillodii (MCVE:4905).

Notes.

Pseudobaeospora deceptiva is a species difficult to distinguish from P. pillodii without careful observation of some morphological characters: it shows larger basidiomes (pileus 5–20 mm and stipe up to 2.5 mm wide), a stipe without basal rhizoids, spores on average longer than 4.5 µm, and frequent subtrichodermic structures near the pileus margin. The two collections studied here were previously identified as P. pillodii. The difference between the spore dimensions of the two species is even more worthy of attention if we consider that while the collections of P. pillodii show a variable percentage of bisporic basidia, those of P. deceptiva are consistently tetrasporic. The ITS sequences do not unambiguously separate the two species (Fig. 3) but they are clearly different in the multigene analysis where also their SSU and LSU sequences are present (Fig. 2).

Pseudobaeospora sp. described in Adamčík and Ripková (2004b) shares with P. deceptiva the colours of the basidiomes, the clamp-less hyphae, spores longer than 4 µm in average and a suprapellis containing numerous ascending to erect terminal elements (pileocystidia according to Bas 2003) but is distinguished by a very minute basidiome (pileus 4.5 mm wide and stipe 20 × 0.6 mm), pileus with 1–1.5 mm long marginal striation, very sparse lamellae (L = 11, l = 0–1), well-developed versiform to irregular cheilocystidia, different length/width spore ratio (Q = 1.08–1.29), bisporic basidia, and a pseudoparenchymatic subpellis of 9–24 µm wide hyphae.

Among the extra European clamp-less species, P. defibulata Singer described from Argentina on rotten leaves of dicotyledonous trees differs by a smaller pileus (3–7 mm wide), a thinner stipe (0.2–0.6 mm thick), a pale livid to partly almost white pileus, sparse lamellae (L = 13, l = 1), smaller spores, 4.0–4.2 × 3.0–3.2 µm, and a suprapellis of only horizontal hyphae (Singer 1963). Pseudobaeospora citrina Rawla from India, is distinguished by small basidiomes (pileus 5–10 mm, stipe 10–15 × 1 mm) greenish yellow to citrine, pileipellis a trichoderm of repent up to 7 µm wide hyphae, with fasciculate, slightly thick-walled, 28–140 × 3–5 µm hairs (pileocystidia) (Rawla and Arya 1991; Bas 2003).

Figure 7. 

Pseudobaeospora deceptiva (MCVE:15315, holotype). a Basidiomes; b–d pileipellis; e spores; f caulocystidia; b–f in ammoniacal Congo red. Scale bars: 20 µm (b–d); 5 µm (e); 10 µm (f). Photos by L. Setti.

Pseudobaeospora pyrifera Bas & L.G. Krieglst., Z. Mykol. 64(2): 204 (1998)

Figs 8, 9, 10

= Pseudobaeospora mutabilis Bas & Adamčík, in Adamčík and Bas, Mycotaxon 84: 272 (2002)

Holotype.

GERMANY • Bavaria, Lower Franconia, Kitzingen, ‘Klosterforst’, 10 September 1995, leg. L.G. Krieglsteiner s.n. (holotype L; isotype REG).

Selected iconography.

Krieglsteiner (1999: 37, photo G. Wölfel); Chaillet et al. (2007: 7, photo G. Moyne); Krieglsteiner (2010: 74); Arauzo (2011a: p. 34–36); Morozova and Popov (2013: pl. I-2); Caillet et al. (2018: 71).

Selected descriptions.

Bas and Krieglsteiner (1998: 204–205); Adamčík and Bas (2002: 272–274, as P. mutabilis); Bas (2003: 175–177); Chaillet et al. (2007: 5–7); Arauzo (2011a: 34–35); Morozova and Popov (2013: 131–132, in Russian).

Description.

Habit collybioid. Pileus 8–26 mm broad, conical campanulate to plano-convex, finally flattened with an obtuse umbo, margin at first slightly crenulated-undulate, not striate, flattened to revolute in mature specimens, surface dry, pruinose to minutely felted, not or only slightly hygrophanous, purplish brown (Pinkish Vinaceous, Deep Vinaceous, Plate XXVII), dark vinaceous brown to pinkish brown at centre (Dull Magenta Purple, Schoenfeld’s Purple, Indian Lake, Plate XXVI) with a paler margin (brownish pink, Pale Vinaceous, Plate XXVII). Lamellae deeply emarginate with slightly decurrent tooth to almost free, moderately crowded, L = 18–23, 1 = (1–)2–5, rather thick, narrow to ventricose, 2–3 mm broad, reddish violaceous to violaceous pink, becoming lilacinous ochraceous (Lilac, Plate XXV; Pale Rose-Purple, Rosolane Pink, Plate XXVI) to greyish ochraceous, with a concolorous, entire to slightly irregular edge. Stipe 25–50 × 1.2–3.0 mm, cylindrical, solid to slightly hollow at maturity, concolorous with lamellae, dark vinaceous red-brown, purplish brown, at first sparsely but entirely covered by minute silky whitish fibrils and flocks, then evidently fibrillose only at apex, with long whitish strigose felt hair at the base (Fig. 8a, c, d). Context violaceous red, darkening when bruised. Pileus surface showing a bluish-green reaction with a drop of 5% KOH. Smell indistinct. Taste mild. Spore-print white.

Spores (Italian collections, mono-, bi- and tetrasporic) (3.5–)3.8–4.3–4.7(–5.8) × (2.5–)3.0–3.5–4.0(–5.0) μm (64/2/2), Q = (1.00–)1.10–1.22–1.35(–1.63), V = (13.5–)18.3–28.6–38.9(–73.8) μm3, (Slovak collections, tetrasporic) (2.9–)3.2–3.5–3.8(–4.7) × (2.4–)2.9–3.1–3.3(–3.9) μm (160/3/3), Q = (0.96–)1.04–1.12–1.20(–1.36), V = (10.0–)14.2–17.8–21.3(–31.6) μm3, globose, subglobose to subelliptical, sometimes larmiform (drop-like), colorless, smooth, with the tendency to agglomerate in tetrads or in greater numbers (clusters) (Figs 9h, 10j–l), contents granulose or with one or two oil-droplets (guttules), at first thin-walled and inamyloid, but maturing after liberation and becoming thick-walled (0.7–1.3 µm thick), dextrinoid, congophilous and cyanophilous; majority of spores (80–90%) turns green-blue sea in L4 (Fig. 9h). Basidia 21–25 × 5.2–7.2 µm, clavate, sometimes constricted in the middle, in some collections mostly tetrasporic, but also 1–2 sporic, in others strictly tetrasporic, sterigmata up to 4 µm long. Crassobasidia (sclerobasidia) scattered, with thick dextrinoid, strongly congophilous walls (0.8–1 µm thick) turning green-blue sea in L4 (Fig. 9c). Hymenophoral trama subregular to irregular, slightly intertwined (intricate), consisting of hyphae up to 14 µm wide (Fig. 9d). Cheilocystidia 15–25 × 5.8–9.7 × 2.4–5.0 µm, abundant and densely packed, mostly broadly clavate to sphaeropedunculate, sometimes lageniform, subutriform, thin-walled, colorless (Figs 9e–f, 10d–f). Pleurocystidia absent. Pileipellis: suprapellis consisting of loosely arranged chains of inflated pyriform to broadly clavate elements (transition between trichoderm and epithelium) up to 15 µm wide (Figs 9a, b, 10a–c), overlying on a subpellis made up of radially to irregularly arranged chains of largely ellipsoid to cylindrical hyphae, 7–10 µm wide, with minutely yellow-brown encrusting extracellular pigments and intracellular pigments which turn pale greenish blue in KOH (dried material). Pileitrama made up of non-dextrinoid cylindrical hyphae up to 10 µm wide. Stipitipellis consisting of 2–7 µm wide, non-dextrinoid cylindrical hyphae. Stipititrama similar to stipitipellis but hyphae up to 11 wide. Caulocystidia present (observed at stipe apex), 10–30 × 6.7–11 µm, usually clustered in tufts, thin-walled, colorless, narrowly pyriform, clavate, lageniform, sometimes irregularly shaped, often catenulated, apically rounded (Figs 9g, 10g–i). Clamp-connections present.

Habitat and distribution.

Terrestrial, single or in small groups (gregarious), rarely subfasciculate. Known from France, Germany, Italy (the present study), The Netherlands, Spain, Norway, Estonia, and Sweden (see collections in Fig. 3) and Slovakia (as P. mutabilis).

Specimen examined.

ITALY • 11 December 2009, Punta Ala (Castiglione della Pescaia, GR), in a mixed forest of Quercus ilex L. and Juniperus oxycedrus ssp. macrocarpa (Sm.) Neilr., leg. L. Setti (AMB 18729); 23 November 2016, Castelporziano (Ostia, RM), in a mixed forest of broad-leaved trees, leg. G. Consiglio & A. Gennari (AMB 18730). SWEDEN • Dalarna, 4 September 2018, leg. E. Larsson (GB:0160633) (as P. pillodii). SLOVAKIA • Záhorská níñina lowland, Abrod National Nature Reserve, Závod village, among the tall vegetation of Molinia caerulea (L.) Moench, near solitary Betula and Frangula alnus Mill., 12 August 1998, leg. S. Adamčík, V. Stanová & A. Viceníková (SAV-F:3518, holotype of P. mutabilis); • Biele Karpaty Mts., 1.5 km E of Nová Bošáca, Blažejová Nature Monument, on soil among the grass, 30 July 2005, leg. S. Adamčík (SAV-F:3525, as P. mutabilis); • ibidem, 27 September 2005, leg. V. Kučera, (SAV-F:3524, as P. mutabilis); • Biele Karpaty Mts., Blažejová Nature Monument, Nová Bošáca village, the settlement of Španie, 29 June 2020, leg. S. Adamčík (SAV-F:20580, as P. mutabilis); • Biele Karpaty Mts., Krivoklátske lúky, 20 July 2020, leg. S. Adamčík (SAV-F:20589, as P. mutabilis).

Notes.

Pseudobaeospora pyrifera was originally described from Southern Germany (Bavaria, Lower Franconia) and The Netherlands (Bas and Krieglsteiner 1998). Krieglsteiner (1999) reported five additional collections from the type locality (Lower Franconia) and seven collections from three other localities. At the type locality he found it sometimes to be the most abundant fungal species. It has been found in moist woods (Pruno-Fraxinetum), grasslands (Cirsio tuberosi-Molinietum) and a Juniperus stand, often together with Hygrocybe, Entoloma, Geoglossum and Ramariopsis species. The species has been later reported also from Spain, Iurreta (Bizkaia), locality of the Basque Country (N Spain), in the litter of Chamaecyparis lawsoniana (A. Murray) Parl. plantations (Arauzo 2011a), from France (Haute-Saône and Doubs) in dry lawns (Chaillet et al. 2007; Caillet et al. 2018) and North-western Russia (Novgorod oblast, Batetsky district) in a meadow (Morozova and Popov 2013). Pseudobaeospora pyrifera was included in the CHEGD fungi (the acronym of the constituent taxa: Clavariaceae, Hygrophoraceae Lotsy, Entolomataceae, Geoglossaceae Corda and Dermoloma) by Caboň et al. (2021). CHEGD fungi are a particular group of macrofungi which is characteristic of traditionally managed and undisturbed European grasslands, and which are often the dominant soil fungi in these habitats.

Pseudobaeospora mutabilis Bas & Adamčík from Slovakia was said to have many characters in common with P. pyrifera Bas & L.G. Krieglst. (Adamčík and Bas 2002; Bas 2003; Adamčík et al. 2007) but distinguished by a pileipellis structure as a transition between hymeniderm and epithelium. Moreover, its basidiomes seem to be somewhat sturdier (pileus 7–13 mm in diameter, stipe 20–30 × 1–2 mm) and the lamellae less crowded (L = 18, 1 = 1–3), KOH reaction very variable (inde nomen), on fresh material grey, on dry specimens pale green but sometimes at first violaceous. All the here sequenced collections of P. mutabilis (holotype included, SAV-F:3518) form a highly supported clade together with those of P. pyrifera [isotype included, 10-IX-1995, L. Krieglsteiner (REG)] both in the ITS (Fig. 3) and multigene analyses (Fig. 2). Accordingly, P. mutabilis is here considered as a younger synonym of P. pyrifera. Bas (2003) had even inserted the two species, which we now consider synonymous, into two different groups of his intrageneric sectioning: P. mutabilis in the Celluloderma group (basidiome coloured, clamp-connections present, cheilocystidia absent or present, pileipellis hymenidermoid) together with P. celluloderma; P. pyrifera in the Pyrifera group (basidiome coloured, clamp-connections present, cheilocystidia present and conspicuous, pileipellis not hymenidermoid) together with P. jamonii and P. laguncularis. Voto (2021), in first editions of his online keys to Pseudobaeospora, included P. mutabilis in his sect. Anistoderma (pileipellis hymeniform to ephitelioid) and P. pyrifera in sect. Pseudobaeospora subsect. Pseudobaeospora (pileipellis of principally short and inflated to broad hyphae). This must make us reflect on the fact that in the past too much importance has been given to the structure of the pileipellis both as a character to delimit intrageneric taxa and to distinguish species. The discrepancies in observations of the pileipellis structure might be sometimes a result of analysis of the basidiomes in different stages of development or are due to observations from different parts of the pileus (Adamčík et al. 2007; Ronikier and Moreau 2007).

Pseudobaeospora pyrifera is easily identifiable due to a unique combination of characters: violaceous pink tinges present all over the basidiome, the pale green to greenish blue reaction of pileus surface in KOH, mainly clavate cheilocystidia, pileipellis consisting of repent chains of inflated elements, and very small subglobose spores (Bas and Krieglsteiner 1998; Bas 2003; Arauzo 2011a). It contains peculiar metabolites named pyriferines A–C, which have an unusual eight-membered N/O-acetal ring, derived from L-glutamic acid (Quang et al. 2008). Adamčík et al. (2007) noted in some habitats the occurrence of collections with reddish brown basidiomes (see also our Fig. 8a, collection AMB 18729), instead of purplish violaceous ones, and they demonstrated that the colour of basidiomes was not affected by soil pH. Colour change to bluish grey on surfaces of basidiomes reported in original description of P. mutabilis (Adamčík and Bas 2002) was later not confirmed as a consistent character and might be due to local context pigment degradation rather than oxidation (Adamčík et al. 2007).

Macro- and micromorphology of the Italian collections are fully consistent with the original description (Bas and Krieglsteiner 1998; Bas 2003) and French (Chaillet et al. 2007), Spanish (Arauzo 2011a) and Russian (Morozova and Popov 2013) collections, excepted for the spores that are slightly longer [3.8–4.7 × 3.0–4.0 µm (on average 4.3 × 3.5 µm) vs 2.8–3.7(–4.2) × 2.6–3.5(–3.8) µm, vs 3.5–4.0 × 4.0–4.5 µm, vs 3.1–4 × (2.8–) 3.1–3.6 μm (on average 3.58 × 3.25 µm), and vs 2.9–3.7 × 2.6–3.2 µm, respectively] and subglobose to broadly ellipsoid instead of globose to subglobose (Qm = 1.22 vs 1.05–1.10, and 1.1, respectively). These sporal size discrepancies can be explained by the possible different percentage of (mono-)bisporic basidia on tetrasporic ones between the different collections. In fact, we report below the spore measurements summing the Slovak collections (“P. mutabilis”, which are exclusively tetrasporic) and Italian collections (which are mono-bi-tetrasporic): P. pyrifera+P. mutabilisspores (2.9–)3.2–3.7–4.2(–5.5) × (2.4–)2.9–3.2–3.6(–4.7) μm (224/5/5), Q = (0.96–)1.05–1.15–1.26(–1.63), V = (10.0–)12.9–20.9–28.8(–65.2) μm3.

In this way the spore values ​​are very close to those reported in the literature. It is also worth to mention, that part of the discrepancies in published microscopic descriptions are due to an underestimation of the importance of the number of spores produced on the basidia.

In Europe P. jamonii Bas, Lalli & Lonati from Italy (Piedmont, Monte Rosa 1300 m, and Abruzzo) (Jamoni and Bon 1996; Bas et al. 2002; Bas 2003) seems to be the macromorphologically closest relative of the present species. It differs, however, by the more elongate clavate to (sub)lageniform, cylindrical or irregularly shaped cheilocystidia (15–43 × 4–10 μm), the presence of a distinct suprapellis of comparatively narrow hyphae, slightly larger and slightly more ellipsoid spores (3.2–4.0 × 2.8–3.5 μm, average Q = 1.10–1.15), and a different KOH reaction of the context of the stipe (green).

Pseudobaeospora basii Adamčík & Ripková from Slovakia has a very similar microscopic structure but its basidiomes lack any purple or lilac tinges (Adamčík and Ripková 2004a). Unfortunately, attempts to sequence its holotype collection (SAV-F:3506) did not lead to obtaining a good ITS sequence to compare to.

Pseudobaeospora dichroa Bas (reported from England and Spain) has a pileus surface turning reddish purplish in KOH; pileipellis of often erect, catenulate hyphae near the centre, sometimes with a thin suprapellis, and towards margin of broad repent hyphae. L = 16–30, l = 3–5; pileus and lamellae with shades of red when dried; spores 3.0–4.0 (–4.3) × 2.7–3.5 µm, average Q 1.10–1.20 (1.25); cheilocystidia 10–45 × 3.5–10 (–17) µm, (often irregularly) clavate to lageniform, sometimes filiform, abundant to sparse or absent, sometimes with violaceous content (Bas 2003; Arauzo 2011a).

Pseudobaeospora laguncularis Bas (reported from England, France, Germany, Spain) is very well characterized by the abundant, very slender cheilocystidia, at present unique in the genus. So far it is also the only species with small, scattered, refractive bodies turning red or red brown in KOH on caulocystidia and cheilocystidia, and sometimes also on the pileipellis, and with distinct, albeit sometimes sparse pileocystidia (Bas 2003; Arauzo 2011a; Clesse 2012). Pseudobaeospora laguncularis var. denudata Bas differs from the type by lacking the suprapellis of narrow hyphae. The collection of P. laguncularis var. denudata here sequenced, coming from the same locality of the type (topotype) [LIP PAM99101004, France, Savoie, Billième, forêt de Lierre, sous Buxus sempervirens L. et Quercus pubescens Willd. sur calcaire, alt. 400 m 10 octobre 1999, leg. Maurice Durand & Pierre-Arthur Moreau, 45.708663, 5.810281, Fig. 4c] is molecularly distinct from all the other sequenced species (Figs 2, 3).

Among the non-European species, P. chilensis E. Horak from Chile differs by tiny, very slender basidiomes, inconspicuous, narrow cheilocystidia, and narrower pileipellis elements (Horak 1964).

Pseudobaeospora wipapatiae from Hawaii, differs in forming deep ruby-colored basidiomes, with a pileus rugulo-striatulate nearly to disk, two-spored basidia, irregularly cylindrical to clavate or irregular in outline, sometimes mucronate, amyloid cheilocystidia, an irregular hymeniderm pileipellis with abundant erect pileocystidia and tissues that initially turn deep ruby then change to lilac grey in 3% KOH (Desjardin et al. 2014).

Agaricus fuscolilacinus Peck from Adirondack Mts. of New York (USA), based on the analysis on type material made by Desjardin (2004), who considers the species to belong to Pseudobaeospora, is distinguished by brownish lamellae, ellipsoid to lacrymoid bigger spores, 4.2–6.8 × 3.2–4.0 µm (on average 5.2 ± 0.6 × 3.5 ± 0.2), Q = 1.2–2.0 (Qm = 1.5 ± 0.2), two-spored basidia, and lack of cheilocystidia.

Figure 8. 

Pseudobaeospora pyrifera . Basidiomes. a AMB 18729; b AMB 18730; c SAV-F:3518 (holotype of P. mutabilis); d–f SAV-F:3524. Photos: a, b by G. Consiglio; c–f by S. Jančovičová.

Figure 9. 

Pseudobaeospora pyrifera , microscopic features (AMB 18730). a, b Pileipellis; c crassobasidia; d hymenophoral trama; e, f cheilocystidia; g caulocystidia; h spores; a, b, e, g in ammoniacal Congo red; c, d, f, h in L4. Scale bars: 20 µm (a, d); 5 µm (b, c, e–h). Photos by L. Setti.

Figure 10. 

Pseudobaeospora pyrifera , microscopic features (collections named as P. mutabilis). Pileipellis. a SAV-F:20580; b SAV-F:20589; c SAV-F:3524. Cheilocystidia; d SAV-F:20580; e SAV-F:20589; f SAV-F:3524. Caulocystidia; g SAV-F:20580; h SAV-F:20589; i SAV-F:3524. Spores; j SAV-F:20580; k SAV-F:20589. l SAV-F:3524; a–l in ammoniacal Congo red. Scale bars: 10 µm (a–f, h–i); 20 µm (g). j–l. Photos by L. Setti.

Pseudobaeospora jamonii Bas, Lalli & Lonati, Micol. Veg. Medit. 17(1): 32 (2002)

Fig. 11

P. pillodii (forma) auct. non (Quél.) Wasser: Jamoni & Bon, Bull, trimest. Feder. mycol. Dauphine-Savoie 143: 12 (1996).

Holotype.

(missing): ITALY • Piemonte, Monte Rosa, Alagna, bassa valle dell’Orto, about 1300 m, 3 September 1994, leg. P.G. Jamoni (Fungarium Jamoni).

Neotype.

(designated here, MBT10024683): Italy, Abruzzo, San Pietro, Isola del Gran Sasso (TE), 13 September 1995, leg. G. Lalli & G. Lonati (AQUI:10322).

Selected iconography.

Jamoni and Bon (1996: photo on cover, as form of P. pillodii), Bas et al. (2002: Fig. 1).

Selected descriptions.

Jamoni and Bon (1996: 12–13), Bas (2003: 177–179), Bas et al. (2002: 32–35).

Description.

Spores (2.9–)3.2–3.5–3.8(–4.5) × (2.6–)2.9–3.1–3.3(–3.6) μm (64/1/1), Q = (0.97–)1.04–1.15–1.25(–1.52), V = (11.3–)14.4–17.8–21.2(–28.2) μm3, globose to subglobose, wall up to a 0.8 µm thick, smooth, colorless in L4: hilar appendix prominent, 0.8–1 µm long. Basidia 16–18 × 4.0–5.0 µm, tetrasporic, subclavate to cylindrical, sterigmata up to 4 µm long; crassobasidia very rare. Hymenophoral trama regular to subregular, consisting of up to 8 µm wide hyphae, colorless in L4. Cheilocystidia mainly clavate, hardly differentiated from the basidia, but also elongate clavate to (sub)lageniform, cylindrical or irregularly shaped, 25–32 × 8.3–10.3 µm. Pleurocistidia absent. Pileipellis: turning greenish brownish to pale green in KOH; suprapellis formed by broadly ellipsoid to broadly cylindrical elements, often emerging and then pileocystidia-like, sometimes slightly swollen, with rounded apex, smooth, up to 9 µm wide; subpellis slightly aeriferous, consisting of slightly gelatinized, smooth, subglobose to broadly cylindrical, up to 16 µm wide hyphae; pigments light brown, mainly intracellular. Stipitipellis composed of cylindrical, densely septate, up to 3 µm wide, longitudinal and parallel hyphae. Stipititrama of up to 10–12 µm wide hyphae, greenish in KOH. Caulocystidia at stipe apex scattered or clustered, 10–50 × 4–10 pm, filiform to narrowly clavate, subcylindrical or slender and somewhat irregular. Clamp-connections present mainly on the suprapellis hyphae and at the basidia and cheilocystidia bases.

Material examined.

ITALY • Abruzzo, San Pietro, Isola del Gran Sasso (TE), 13 Sept. 1995, G. Lalli & G. Lonati (AQUI:10322, neotype).

Notes.

Both the holotype (private fungarium, Jamoni) and the isotype collections (L) are missing (Pier Giovanni Jamoni, pers. comm. and Nicolien Sol, Leiden, pers. comm., respectively). The Italian collection studied here (AQUI:10322) was included as part of studied material (paratype) in the protologue (Bas et al. 2002) and is selected as the neotype here.

This taxon was first time provisionally described as a peculiar form of P. pillodii with clamp-connections, cheilocystidia and tetrasporic basidia, from Alpine areas in Piedmont (northwestern Italy) in mixed forests (Alnus incana, Acer, Fraxinus, Fagus, Corylus, and Picea abies) often near Buxus (Jamoni and Bon 1996). It was then formally described as a new species (Bas et al. 2002) based on the previously cited Piedmont collections and a new collection from Abruzzi (Central Italy) and included by Bas (2003) in his European monographic work on the genus.

Both in the multigene (Fig. 2) and ITS analyses (Fig. 3), the neotype collection of P. jamonii is recovered as an independent species. In the multigene analysis, it is sister to a clade formed by P. wipapatiae and P. pyrifera (including P. mutabilis); in the ITS analysis, it is sister to a clade consisting of four environmental sequences of an undescribed probably new species from Portugal. Similarities and differences between this species and P. pyrifera are discussed above.

Figure 11. 

Pseudobaeospora jamonii , microscopic features (neotype, AQUI:10322). a–c Pileipellis; d, e cheilocystidia; f spores; a–f in ammoniacal Congo red. Scale bars: 20 µm (a); 10 µm (b–e); 5 µm (f). Photos by L. Setti.

Pseudobaeospora celluloderma Bas, Persoonia 18(1): 119 (2002)

Fig. 12

Holotype.

ENGLAND • Surrey, Mickleham Downs, 19 June 1991, leg. A. Henrici (K(M) 17188).

Selected iconography.

Karasch (2004: 34 Abb. 6).

Selected descriptions.

Bas (2003: 173–174), Adamčík et al. (2007: 370–372).

Description.

Spores (3.3–)3.7–4.0–4.4(–5.0) × (2.7–)2.9–3.2–3.5(–4.4) μm (64/2/2), Q = (1.00–)1.16–1.28–1.41(–1.61), V = (14.1–)15.9–21.5–27.2(–50.1) μm3, globose to subglobose or broadly ellipsoid, walls up to 0.8 µm thick, dextrinoid at maturity, smooth, colorless in L4; hilar appendix prominent, 0.8–1 µm long. Basidia 16 × 4 µm, tetrasporic, clavate, sterigmata up to 2.5 µm long. Hymenophoral trama regular to subregular, composed of globose to subglobose, broadly cylindrical, up to 22 µm wide hyphae, colorless in L4. Cheilocystidia 23–25 × 5–7 µm, thin-walled, poorly differentiated and similar to basidioles. Pleurocystidia absent. Pileipellis: suprapellis cellulodermic/epithelioid, composed of slightly gelatinized, smooth, globose to subglobose, up to 24 × 22 µm elements; subpellis like suprapellis structure but with 21 × 13 µm elements, with rare cylindraceous hyphae; pigments greenish, intracellular. Stipitipellis consisting of up to 4 µm wide, multiseptate, closely packed, longitudinal hyphae. Stipititrama like stipitipellis structure but with up to 12 µm wide hyphae. Caulocystidia 12–22 × 2–7 µm, numerous at stipe apex, single or in small clusters, scattered towards the stipe base, often multiseptate with terminal elements cylindrical to broadly clavate. Clamp-connections rare, scattered.

Specimen examined: SLOVAKIA, Vihorlatské vrchy Mts., ca. 1.5 km SW of the church, old pastures, Strihovce village, terrestrial, on flysh, 18 April 2003, leg. V. Kučera (SAV-F:3516). SWEDEN, Medelpad, Borgsjö, öster om Östby, Örtrik granskog (Medelpad, Borgsjö, east of Östby, Örtrik spruce forest), 3 September 1991, leg. L. Andersson (UPS-F: 623041) (as Pseudobaeospora pillodii).

Notes.

Pseudobaeospora celluloderma is a well characterized species circumscribed by its minute and slender mycenoid basidiomes which are brightly purple to reddish violet when moist (reminding Laccaria amethystina Cooke), sometimes greyish vinaceous coloured; strongly translucently striate pileus when moist; lamellae concolorous with pileus; pileus surface in KOH pale brownish to pale pinkish-greyish, clamp-connections present (sometimes as pseudoclamps, Bas 2003); cheilocystidia absent or basidiole-like, and an irregular hymenidermic pileipellis (Bas 2002, 2003; Adamčík et al. 2007; Kalinina et al. 2020). It was reported in Europe from Austria, Denmark, England, Finland, France, Germany, Slovakia, Sweden, and Russia (Bas 2002, 2003; Karasch 2004; Courtecuisse and Lécuru 2006; Adamčík et al. 2007; Læssøe 2008, 2012; Hausknecht et al. 2012; Kalinina et al. 2020).

The sequences from two North American collections named P. celluloderma (KU058501, USA North Carolina, ECV5550/TENN 067659) and Pseudobaeospora sp. (KU058500, USA, Tennessee TENN 070699/CCB143666) (Figs 2, 3) are weakly supported as sisters related to the two European collections we have sequenced and studied, and probably represent one or two distinct undescribed taxa.

Figure 12. 

Pseudobaeospora celluloderma , microscopic features (UPS-F 623041). a–c Pileipellis; d cheilocystidia; e crassobasidia; f spores; a–f in ammoniacal Congo red. Scale bars: 10 µm (a, b, d); 15 µm (c); 5 µm (e, f). Photos by L. Setti.

Pseudobaeospora cyanea Arnolds, Tabarés & Rocabruna, Revta Catal. Micol. 25: 66 (2003)

Figs 4b, 13

Holotype.

SPAIN • Catalonia, Girona, La Selva, surroundings of Mas de Llagostera (UTM 31 T 0480 4622), 200 m, on acidic, humus-rich soil above granite, in forest with Pinus pinaster, Quercus suber, Arbutus unedo and Erica arborea, probably saprobic, 6 November 2002, leg. J. Carreras & M. Tabarés, (BCN SCM B-4742).

Selected iconography.

Arnolds et al. (2003: 69), Arauzo (2011a: 24, 26), Gisotti et al. (2021: fig. 1).

Selected descriptions.

Arnolds et al. (2003: 66–68), Arauzo (2011a: 23, 25), Gisotti et al. (2021: 123–125).

Description.

Spores (4.0–)4.5–4.8–5.2(–5.4) × (2.9–)3.5–3.7–4.0(–4.2) μm (64/1/1), Q = (1.10–)1.21–1.31–1.40(–1.51), V = (19.7–)29.2–35.2–41.3(–48.0) μm3, broadly ellipsoid to ellipsoid, slightly amygdaliform in side view, walls up to 0.8 µm thick and dextrinoid at maturity, smooth, colorless in L4, hilar appendix prominent, 0.8–1 µm long. Basidia 21–25 × 6.5–8.0 µm, some with up to 1 μm thick wall (crassobasidia), tetrasporic, rarely bisporic to monosporic, clavate, sterigmata up to 4.5 µm long. Hymenophoral trama regular to subregular, composed of up to 12 µm wide cylindrical to inflated hyphae, colorless in L4. Cheilocystidia 15–30(–34) × 3–7(–11) µm, rare, scattered, basidiola-like to irregularly cylindrical, lageniform, sometimes lobed to furcate. Pleurocystidia present, very rare, similar to cheilocystidia but bigger, up to 56 × 12 µm. Pileipellis: suprapellis (at the pileus centre) a transition between trichoderm and epithelium consisting of loosely entangled ascending and erect pluriseptate hyphae, terminal elements broadly cylindrical, clavate to subglobose, up to 18 µm wide; towards the pileus margin it tends to become a cutis with repent hyphae; pigment abundant, brownish grey, bluish, intracellular and encrusting (extracellular), green in KOH; pileitrama consisting of up to 8 µm wide cylindrical hyphae. Stipitipellis consisting of 2–4 µm wide, multiseptate, parallel, cylindrical hyphae. Stipititrama similar to the stipitipellis structure but with 3–6 µm wide hyphae. Caulocystidia 10–70(–80) × 3.0–7 µm, filiform, sinuous, often multiseptate, sometimes irregularly lobed and furcate. Clamp-connections present everywhere.

Specimen examined.

ITALY • Liguria, Pegli (GE), 95 m, in an area of shrub-like Mediterranean vegetation with Pinus pinaster Aiton, Arbutus unedo L., Erica arborea L., Cistus salvifolius L., and Quercus ilex L., on poor acidic soil with serpentine bedrock, in the needle litter of P. pinaster, 6 December 2016, leg. D. Gisotti & F. Boccardo (GDOR:M3986).

Notes.

The species was originally described from Spain (Arnolds et al. 2003; Arauzo 2011a) and then recently found in Liguria, Italy (Gisotti et al. 2021). Pseudobaeospora cyanea is clearly distinguished from the other species by a unique combination of features such as a bright bluish-purple pileus, pale lamellae and stipe, a trichodermic structure of the pileipellis (with inflated elements), green reaction of the pileipellis to KOH and well-developed cheilocystidia (Arnolds et al. 2003). Our microscopic analysis of the collection studied by Gisotti et al. (2021) (GDOR:M3986) revealed the presence of rare pleurocystidia which were not recorded by previous authors. Pleurocystidia were so far only reported for P. aciculifera Voto & Soop (Voto and Soop 2018), and P. taluna (Craig et al. 2023), two species of the southern hemisphere. Both Spanish and Italian collections were made in Mediterranean areas in winter, viz. Mediterranean hills with Pinus pinaster, Arbutus unedo and Erica arborea (Arnolds et al. 2003), and an area of shrub-like Mediterranean vegetation with P. pinaster, A. unedo, E. arborea, C. salvifolius, and Q. ilex (Gisotti et al. 2021), respectively. The morphology of the Spanish and Italian collections compared was completely consistent.

In the multigene analysis (Fig. 2) the most closely allied species is P. lilacina X.D. Yu, Ming Zhang & S.Y. Wu from China (Wu et al. 2017), which is distinguished by a pileus surface pale mauve, colonial buff when old, smaller spores 2.5–3.5(–4.5) × 3–5(–6.5) μm, cheilocystidia absent, and pileipellis hyphae not changing color in 5% KOH.

Pseudobaeospora pallidifolia Bas, A. Gennari & Robich from mossy coniferous forest in Tuscany (Italy) so far known only from the type locality, is similar to P. cyanea by the dark pileus with paler margin strongly contrasting with whitish to pinkish cream lamellae and the pale stipe, but differs by lack of cheilocystidia, and comparatively large and more elongated ellipsoid spores 4.4–6.4 × 3.3–4.4 μm, Q = 1.30–1.40 (Bas et al. 1997; Bas 2003).

Figure 13. 

Pseudobaeospora cyanea , microscopic features (GDOR M3986). a, b Pileipellis; c hymenium (basidia and cheilocystidia); d basidia; e spores; f hymenophoral trama; a–f in ammoniacal Congo red. Scale bars: 20 µm (a, b, f); 10 µm (c); 5 µm (d, e). Photos by L. Setti.

Pseudobaeospora calcarea /P. terrayi complex

Figs 4a, e, f

Notes.

Pseudobaeospora calcarea was described from Switzerland occurring among and on mosses [mainly Hypnum cupressiforme Hedw., Dicranum scoparium Hedw., Hylocomium splendens (Hedw.) W.P. Schimp., and Pleurozium schreberi (Brid.) Mitt.] in coniferous woods (Pinus sylvestris with Quercus pubescens). It was placed into the informal Albidula group as circumscribed by Bas (2003), encompassing species with white to pale buff basidiomes, clamp-connections, absent cheilocystidia and pileipellis without inflated elements. This species differs from all others of this group by a very acrid taste, a negative reaction with KOH (no yellow discoloration) and the absence of clamp-connections in most of the trama and pileipellis hyphae (Clémençon and Ayer 2007). Adamčík and Jančovičová (2011) described P. terrayi, a minute, not moss-associated species from Slovakia, which was included in the Albidula group due to the white basidiome colour, despite the presence of cheilocystidia. The species was distinguished from P. calcarea by very small basidiomes (pileus 5–8 mm wide versus 7–20 mm), more distant lamellae (L = 11–18 versus 16–28), a mild taste, an occasional presence of an unpleasant fishy smell, a yellowish-greenish discoloration in 5% KOH, presence of cheilocystidia, which are somewhat basidia-like, but often broader and sometimes with distinctly thickened walls and/or incrusted surface, and clamp-connections present in all tissues.

In our ITS analysis (Fig. 3) three collections of P. calcarea, including a specimen from Switzerland (LIP PAM06090111), and two collections of P. terrayi (holotype included, SAV-F:3317) were found intermixed with each other in a strongly supported clade (PP 1.0, ML BP 92%), suggesting a possible conspecificity of P. calcarea and P. terrayi. Unfortunately, the holotype and isotype collections of P. calcarea (kept at LAU) have not been declared available for molecular analysis (Patrice Descombes, personal comm.). Multigene analysis is essential also to confirm that variability within this clade in the ITS region does not correspond to more than one species as documented in P. pillodii and P. deceptiva complex.

Specimen sequenced.

P. calcarea : SUISSE, Grisons, Alvaneu-Bad, ripisylve à Alnus incana, 1 September 2006, leg. Pierre-Arthur Moreau. 46.66591, 9.64329, (LIP PAM06090111). P. terrayi: SLOVAKIA, Laborecká vrchovina Mts., ca. 1 km NE of Svetlice village, the riverside meadow extensively used as pasture, on ground among ca. 15–30 cm tall herbal vegetation composed of Achillea millefolium L., Agrimonia eupatoria L., Agrostis capillaris L., Dactylis glomerata L., Daucus carota L., Festuca pratensis Huds., F. rubra L., Jacea pratensis Lam., Leontodon hispidus L., Lotus corniculatus L., Pimpinella saxifraga L., Plantago lanceolata L., Poa pratensis L., Thymus pulegioides L., Tithymalus cyparissias L., Trifolium repens L., Veronica chamaedris L. and Viola hirta L., 458 m, coord. 49°11'12.9"N, 22°02'55.8"E, 23 Oct 2007, leg. J. Terray (SAV-F:3317 holotype); Kremnické vrchy Mts., Tajov, pasture W of the village centre, 24 October 2020, leg. S. Adamčík (SAV-F:20813).

Discussion

Phylogenetic position of Pseudobaeospora

Taxonomic position of the genus Pseudobaeospora has long been debated, swinging from Agaricaceae Chevall. tribus Lepioteae/or tribus Cystodermateae (Singer 1951, 1962, 1963, 1975, 1986; Locquin 1952; Horak 1964, 2005; Aberdeen 1992; Wasser 2002) to Tricholomataceae s.l. (Singer 1942; Heinemann 1978; Kühner 1980; Bas 1995, 2003; Bon 1999; Kirk et al. 2008; Vellinga 2009; Læssøe 2008, 2012; Kříž 2018). The dextrinoid nature of the thickened mature spore wall of Pseudobaeospora was overemphasized by the first authors as an important argument for placing it close to the lepiotoid fungi.

Morphological arguments stressed for placing Pseudobaeospora in the Tricholomataceae are (I) the shape of the basidiomes, which is more collybioid than lepiotoid; II) the continuous context at the connection of the stipe and the pileus; (III) the attachment of the lamellae, which is only exceptionally free, but mostly adnate-emarginate, and sometimes even adnate; and (IV) the absence of any sign of a veil (but the ontogeny of the basidiome has not yet been studied). However, Pseudobaeospora shows a combination of features such as small-sized mycenoid to collybioid basidiomes, surfaces reacting with KOH, small thick-walled dextrinoid spores which is unique or aberrant in this family.

Pseudobaeospora pyrifera was the first species of the genus included in a molecular phylogenetic analysis based on 28S (LSU) rDNA and ITS data, highlighting that it does not belong to the Agaricaceae and it showed affinities with Tricholoma (T. focale (Fr.) Ricken), Entoloma (Entolomataceae Kotl. & Pouzar), Thaxterogaster Singer (Cortinariaceae Singer), and Cystoderma Fayod (Squamanitaceae Jülich) (Vellinga 2003, 2004). Ribosomal DNA sequence analysis by Desjardin et al. (2014), placed P. pyrifera and P. wipapatiae as sister (but without statistical support) to a clade consisting of Leucopaxillus albissimus (Peck) Singer and some Tricholoma species. In both the nrITS and nrLSU separate sequence analyses by Wu et al. (2017), four Pseudobaeospora species (P. lilacina, P. pyrifera, P. deckeri and P. wipapatiae) were placed sister (PP = 1) to Callistosporium graminicolor Lennox (Callistosporiaceae, Tricholomatineae). In multigene phylogenetic analyses (Sánchez-García and Matheny 2017; He et al. 2019), however always based on a small number of Pseudobaeospora taxa and not including the type species, Pseudobaeospora clustered in Tricholomataceae s.s, as delimited by Sánchez-García et al. (2014), in the suborder Tricholomatineae (Dentinger et al. 2015). This latter placement was also supported in the analyses by Sánchez-García et al. (2020, 2021) and He and Yang (2022).

As highlighted by the present molecular analyses (Figs 1, 2), all Pseudobaeospora species group into a monophyletic clade which is sister to a clade corresponding to Tricholomataceae sensu Sánchez-García et al. (2014) and Vizzini et al. (2016). The segregation of Pseudobaeospora into its own subfamily leads the core of Tricholomataceae (Tricholomataceae subfam, Tricholomatoideae) becoming more homogeneous.

Intrageneric taxa

Only two proposals for the intrageneric classification of Pseudobaeospora species were provided in the literature, both based on morphological characters (Bas 2003; Voto 2009, 2015, 2021). Bas (2003) divided the genus into five (morpho)groups (Albidula, Celluloderma, Pyrifera, Frieslandica, and Pillodii) based primarily on basidiome colour and the presence or absence of clamp-connections, presence or absence of cheilocystidia and type of pileipellis (cutis, hymenodermoid, not hymenodermoid). Voto (2009, 2021) recognized in Pseudobaeospora two sections, P. sect. Anistoderma (species with hymeniform pileipellis) and P. sect. Pseudobaeospora (species with non-hymeniform pileipellis further divided into the two subsections Pseudobaeospora for the species with a trichoderm and Holocutis for those with a cutis) only (exclusively) relied on the differences in the structure of the pileipellis. These intrageneric taxa are deemed to be probably artificial by Bas and Voto themselves.

Recent preliminary evidence (see Gisotti et al. 2021; Craig et al. 2023) show that morphology-based sections and subsections as circumscribed by Voto (2009, 2015, 2021) are not consistent with phylogeny, in particular the separation of species with a hymeniform pileipellis in P. section Anistoderma from those with a trichoderm or cutis in P. section Pseudobaeospora. In particular, Craig et al. (2023) recovered, from their phylogeny (but based only on ITS and a poor taxon sampling), two highly supported main clades which they named as the P. calcarea clade (= P. pillodii clade in the present study), consisting of P. aphana Vellinga, P. calcarea and P. celluloderma (collections from USA), and the P. pyrifera clade, consisting of P. cyanea, P. deckeri, P. lilacina, P. pyrifera, P. taluna and P. wipapatiae. Our phylogenetic analysis based on a larger taxon sampling (including also the type species) led to the similar conclusions (Fig. 3). The same two major clades (the core of Pseudobaeospora) were recognized which included the same species as in Craig et al. (2023) and, in addition, the P. pyrifera clade also contained P. jamonii, P. laguncularis var. denudata and P. stevensii; the P. pillodii clade also P. pillodii, P. deceptiva, P. terrayi, and P. celluloderma (European collections). Pseudobaeospora brunnea, originally described from Spain (Arauzo 2011a, b; Rubio Casa and Palazòn 2019; Bañares Baudet and Moreno 2022) then found also in France (Moyne and Moingeon 2018) but occurring also in Estonia and Georgia based on some environmental sequences (corresponding to UNITE species hypothesis SH1111686) (Fig. 3), is placed outside the core Pseudobaeospora species.

Both P. wipapatiae (of the P. pyrifera clade) and P. celluloderma (of the P. pillodii clade), which were placed by Voto (2021) in P. section Anistoderma, do not form a separate clade but are each intermingled with species of P. section Pseudobaeospora. The six species of the P. pillodii clade all lack cheilocystidia (except P. terrayi where they are basidiola-like), whereas among the species of the P. pyrifera clade, cheilocystidia are usually present, albeit often not well-differentiated. Secondly, in the P. pillodii clade, there is not a distinct reaction to KOH (or at most a pale brownish or greenish reaction in P. celluloderma and P. terrayi), while in the P. pyrifera clade, seven out of the nine species have a strong reaction in KOH, becoming either blue-green, green, or ruby red (P. wipapatiae).

A highly supported clade (PP 1.0, ML BP 92%) within the P. pillodii clade, consisted of P. calcarea/P. terrayi, P. aphana and Pseudobaeospora sp. (TENN 070699/CCB143666, collected by C.C. Braaten) which are all taxa characterized by whitish basidiomes (Clémençon and Ayer 2007; Vellinga 2009; Adamčík and Jančovičová 2011; P.B. Matheny, pers. comm.).

In the highly supported clade (PP 1.0, ML BP 100%) within the P. pyrifera clade, formed by P. pyrifera (including P. mutabilis), P. jamonii, P. wipapatiae and P. deckeri, all the species share violet tinges on pileus, a strong reaction in KOH and presence of clamp-connections, presence of cheilocystidia (except for P. deckeri); but the pileipellis structure is very different from simply hymenodermic (P. pyrifera/P. mutabilis), hymenodermic with pileocystidia (P. wipapatiae) or trichodermic (P. deckeri), to a cutis with a few ascending hyphae (P. jamonii).

Two major sister (PP 1.0, ML BP 66%) clades corresponding to the P. pillodii clade and the P. pyrifera clade were also obtained in the multigene tree (Fig. 2): the first (PP 1.0, ML BP 59%) formed by P. pillodii, P. celluloderma and P. aff. celluloderma; the second (PP 1.0, ML BP 100%) by P. lilacina, P. cyanea, P. jamonii, P. wipapatiae and P. pyrifera.

Whereas the KOH reactions, the presence of cheilocystidia (when well-developed) can be useful systematic markers at an interspecific and/or supraspecific level, and the pileipellis structure only at interspecific level, the presence of mono-bisporic versus tetrasporic basidia is not a species discriminating character. For example, as already pointed out by Craig et al. (2023), an entirely bisporic collection of P. taluna from continental Australia (Victoria, MEL 2363200 OQ457539) is conspecific with the tetrasporic collections from Tasmania (Fig. 3), and bisporic/tetrasporic collections of P. pillodii are conspecific with the entirely tetrasporic ones. Some species are known to possess bisporic and tetrasporic basidia even either on the same lamella or in separate collections (e.g., P. pillodii, P. taluna…). Contrary to that, the presence of clamp-connections was consistent within collections of each species and only P. pillodii and P. deceptiva lack clamp-connections.

Conclusions

This study is the first effort to link morphology-based classification of Pseudobaeospora with phylogenetic data. Twenty-six Pseudobaeospora collections corresponding to eleven species (five types) were newly sequenced. Pseudobaeospora occupied a unique position within Tricholomataceae and deserved to be placed in a subfamily of its own. Multigenic analyses conducted on a larger number of species will be needed for better understanding of phylogenetic relationships within the genus and for testing the support for clades established so far mainly based on ITS sequences. Multiloci data and larger taxon sampling are also essential to understand phylogenetic history and origin of the genus Pseudobaeospora. Our ITS analysis demonstrated that the genus is almost globally distributed (also an African collection representative ITS sequence is present) and with two Australian clades mixed with other members of P. pyrifera clade from Northern Hemisphere. It suggests a Pangean origin with multiple migration events.

In general, a lot of synonymy and disagreement in recognition of Pseudobaeospora species is due to overemphasizing spore dimensions that should always be interpreted together with the number of sterigmata on basidia. Furthermore, pileipellis structure that is influenced by the basidiome development and/or placement on the pileus, has been interpreted in different ways by various authors and the terminology used to describe it is often not accurate.

Acknowledgements

Jean-Michel Bellanger (France), Katriina Bendiksen (Norway), Fabrizio Boccardo (Italy), Stefan Ekman (Sweden), Moniques Gardes (France), Dario Gisotti (Italy), Pier Giovanni Jamoni (Italy), Sona Jančovičová (Slovakia), Ellen Larsson (Sweden), Marco Leonardi (Italy), Brandon Matheny (USA), Pierre-Arthur Moreau (France), Olga Morozova (Russia), Juliette Rochet (France), Anna Ronikier (Poland), Mélanie Roy (France), Raffaella Trabucco (Italy), are acknowledged for dried fungal material and sequences and photos of some collections.

Additional information

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Ethical statement

No ethical statement was reported.

Adherence to national and international regulations

Not applicable.

Funding

The work of KA and SA was funded by the Slovak Research and Development Agency project no. APVV 20-0257, APVV 19-0134 and Slovak Research Grant Agency project no. VEGA 02/0050/22.

Author contributions

AV and GC conceived and conceptualized the study; GC, KA and SA carried out sample collection; GC, KA and SA performed molecular studies; LS performed microscopic analysis; GC and LS performed statistical analysis of microstructures; GC performed phylogenetic analyses; KA and SA provided funds and/or acquired funding; AV drafted the manuscript; AV prepared figures; all authors read, edited, and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Author ORCIDs

Alfredo Vizzini https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8390-6446

Giovanni Consiglio https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8788-5195

Katarína Adamčíková https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5407-5233

Slavomír Adamčík https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2156-5767

Data availability

The ITS and combined alignments used for the phylogenetic analyses are deposited in Figshare (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28351739). The newly generated sequences are deposited in GenBank as reported in the main text.

References

  • Aberdeen JEC (1992) Lepiotoid genera (Agaricales) in south-eastern Queensland. Aberdeen publications, Galles, Queensland, 1–34.
  • Adamčík S, Bas C (2002) Pseudobaeospora mutabilis, a new species discovered in Slovakia. Mycotaxon 84: 271–275.
  • Adamčík S, Jančovičová S (2011) Pseudobaeospora terrayi, a new species from Slovakia. Sydowia 63(2): 131–140.
  • Adamčík S, Ripková S (2004b) First record of a Pseudobaeospora species from the Czech Republic. Czech Mycology 56(3–4): 239–246. https://doi.org/10.33585/cmy.56306
  • Alvarado A, Moreau P-A, Dima B, Vizzini A, Consiglio G, Moreno G, Setti L, Kekki T, Huhtinen S, Liimatainen K, Niskanen T (2018a) Pseudoclitocybaceae fam. nov. (Agaricales, Tricholomatineae), a new arrangement at family, genus and species level. Fungal Diversity 90(1): 109–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-018-0400-1
  • Alvarado A, Moreau P-A, Sesli E, Khodjad LY, Contu M, Vizzini A (2018b) Phylogenetic studies on Bonomyces (Tricholomatineae, Agaricales) and two new combinations from Clitocybe. Cryptogamie Mycologie 39(2): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.7872/crym/v39.iss2.2018.149
  • Alvarado P, Moreno G, Vizzini A, Consiglio G, Manjon JL, Setti L (2015) Atractosporocybe, Leucocybe and Rhizocybe: three new clitocyboid genera in the Tricholomatoid clade (Agaricales) with notes on Clitocybe and Lepista. Mycologia 107(1): 123–136. https://doi.org/10.3852/13-369
  • Anil Raj KN, Manimohan P (2018) A new species and a new record of Clitopilus and a description of C. orientalis from India based on morphology and molecular phylogeny. Phytotaxa 343(1): 47–59. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.343.1.4
  • Antonín V, Dvořák D (2010) New, rare and lesser-known macromycetes in Moravia (Czech Republic) – IX. Acta Musei Moraviae, Scientiae biologicae (Brno) 95(1): 143–162.
  • Antonín V, Noordeloos ME (1997) A monograph of Marasmius, Collybia and related genera in Europe. Part 2: Collybia, Gymnopus, Rhodocollybia, Crinipellis, Chaetocalathus, and additions to Marasmiellus. Libri Botanici 17: 1–256.
  • Antonin V, Noordeloos ME (2010) A monograph of marasmioid and collybioid fungi in Europe. IHW Verlag, Berchtesgaden.
  • Arauzo S (2011a) Estudios en el género Pseudobaeospora. Errotari 8: 14–37.
  • Arauzo S (2011b) Estudios en el género Pseudobaeospora. Naturaren Ahotsa, La Voz de la Naturaleza 138: 21–40.
  • Arnolds E (1993) Notulae ad Floram agaricinam neerlandicam – XX. A revision of Dermoloma (J. Lange) Sing. 2. Persoonia 15(2): 187–196.
  • Arnolds E, Tabarés M, Rocabruna A (2003) Pseudobaeospora cyanea, a new agaric species from Catalonia. Revista Catalana de Micologia 25: 65–70.
  • Arnolds EJM, Leelavathy KM, Manimohan P (2004) Pseudobaeospora lavendulamellata, a new species from Kerala, India. Persoonia 18(3): 435–438.
  • Asif M, Saba M, Raza M, Vellinga EC (2024) Molecular insights into fungal diversity reveal three novel species of Leucocoprinus from southern Punjab, Pakistan. Mycologia 116(4): 601–620. https://doi.org/10.1080/00275514.2024.2351769
  • Bañares Baudet Á, Moreno G (2022) Additions to the mycobiota of the Canary Islands. XIV. Agaricomycetidae. Boletín de la Sociedad Micológica de Madrid 46: 37–48.
  • Baroni TJ, Matheny PB (2011) A re-evaluation of gasteroid and cyphelloid species of Entolomataceae from eastern North America. Harvard Papers in Botany 16(2): 293–310. https://doi.org/10.3100/0.25.016.0205
  • Baroni TJ, Bocsusis N, Lodge DJ, Lindner D (2008) A new species of Pleurocollybia (Tricholomataceae; Agaricales; Basidiomycetes) from Belize. Mycotaxon 103: 353–363.
  • Baroni TJ, Hofstetter V, Largent DL, Vilgalys R (2011) Entocybe is proposed as a new genus in the Entolomataceae (Agaricomycetes, Basidiomycota) based on morphological and molecular evidence. North American Fungi 6(12): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.2509/naf2011.006.012
  • Bas C (1995) Pseudobaeospora. In: Bas C, Kuyper ThW, Noordeloos ME, Vellinga EC (Eds) Flora agaricina neerlandica 3. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, 132–134.
  • Bas C (1996) Notulae ad floram agaricinam Neerlandicam XXXI, Latin diagnoses of two new species in Pseudobaeospora. Persoonia 16: 255.
  • Bas C (1998) Validation of Hydropus scabipes var. quadrisporus and Pseudobaeospora frieslandica. Persoonia 17(1): 140.
  • Bas C (2002) A reconnaissance of the genus Pseudobaeospora in Europe I. Persoonia 18(1): 115–122.
  • Bas C (2003) A reconnaissance of the genus Pseudobaeospora in Europe II. Persoonia 18(2): 163–199.
  • Bas C, Krieglsteiner L (1998) Pseudobaeospora pyrifera, a new species found in southern Germany and The Netherlands. Zeitschrift für Mykologie 64(2): 203–206.
  • Bas C, Gennari A, Robich G (1997) Pseudobaeospora pallidifolia Bas, Gennari et Robich. Una nuova specie dall’Italia. Rivista di Micologia 40(3): 195–199.
  • Bas C, Lalli G, Lonati G (2002) Pseudobaeospora jamonii, una nuova specie in Italia. Micologia e Vegetazione Mediterranea 17: 31–35.
  • Bellanger J-M, Moreau P-A, Corriol G, Bidaud A, Chalange R, Dudova Z, Richard F (2015) Plunging hands into the mushroom jar: a phylogenetic framework for Lyophyllaceae (Agaricales, Basidiomycota). Genetica 143: 169–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10709-015-9823-8
  • Binder M, Hibbett DS, Larsson K, Larsson E, Langer E, Langer G (2005) The phylogenetic distribution of resupinate forms across the major clades Holocutisof mushroom-forming fungi (Homobasidiomycetes). Systematics and Biodiversity 3(2): 113–157. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1477200005001623
  • Binder M, Larsson K-H, Matheny PB, Hibbett D (2010) Amylocorticiales ord. nov. and Jaapiales ord. nov.: early diverging clades of Agaricomycetidae dominated by corticioid forms. Mycologia 102(4): 865–880. https://doi.org/10.3852/09-288
  • Bon M (1993) Flore Mycologique d’Europe 3: Les Lépiotes. Lepiotaceae Roze. Documents mycologiques, Mémoire hors série 3: 1–153.
  • Bon M (1999) Flore mycologique d’Europe 5: Les collybio-marasmïoïdes et ressemblants. Documents Mycologiques, Mémoire hors série 5: 1–17.
  • Bresinsky A, Schmid-Heckel H (1982) Der Lärchenporling und verschiedene Blätterpilze aus den Berchtesgadener Alpen neu für die Bundesrepublik nebst einer Liste indigener Lärchenbegleiter. Berichte der Bayerischen Botanischen Gesellschaft 53: 47–60.
  • Bujakiewicz A (2004) Macromycetes in phytocenoses at the upper forest limit and in the dwarf pine zone in the Babia Góra massif (Western Carpathians). In: Brzeg A, Wojterska M (Eds) Coniferous forest vegetation – differentiation, dynamics and transformations. Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM, Seria Biologia, Poznań, 369–376.
  • Caboň M, Galvánek D, Detheridge AP, Griffith GW, Maráková S, Adamčík S (2021) Mulching has negative impact on fungal and plant diversity in Slovak oligotrophic grasslands. Basic and Applied Ecology 52: 24–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2021.02.007
  • Chaillet P, Moingeon J-M, Moyne G (2007) Flore mycologique des pelouses sèches: 1-Pseudobaeospora pyrifera Bas & Krieglst., et Entoloma queletii (Boud.) Noordelos. Bulletin annuel de la Fédération Mycologique de l’Est 5: 5–9.
  • Christan J, Rexer KH (2020) Pseudobaeospora pillodii (Quél.) Wasser 1980 – Laub-wald-Purpurblatt. Fungi selecti Bavariae 41. Mycologia Bavarica 20: 145.
  • Clémençon H (1972) Zwei verbesserte Präparierlösungen für die microskopische Untersuchung von Pilze. Zeitschrift für Pilzkunde 38: 49–53.
  • Clémençon H (2004) Cytology and Plectology of the Hymenomycetes. 2nd rev. ed., with the assistance of Valerie and Ernest E. Emmerett. J. Cramer Verlag, Berlin-Stuttgart, 1–520.
  • Clémençon H, Ayer F (2007) Pseudobaeospora calcarea, a new species of agaricoid hymenomycetes. Persoonia 19(2): 281–287.
  • Clesse B (2012) Rétrospective mycologique de l’année 2011. Mycolux 1: 26–30.
  • Corriol G, Jargeat P (2018) Albomagister virgineus sp. nov., a second species of Albomagister in Europe. Current Research in Environmental & Applied Mycology (CREAM) 8(2): 162–171. https://doi.org/10.5943/cream/8/2/1
  • Corriol G, Jargeat P (2019) Morphological and phylogenetical description of Dennisiomyces fibrillosus sp. nov. (Agaricales, Tricholomataceae) from the Pyrenees and the first record of the genus in Europe. Phytotaxa 405(5): 226–236. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.405.5.1
  • Courtecuisse R, Lécuru C (2006) Inventaire Mycologique de la Region Nord – Pas de Calais – (3° ed.). Bulletin semestriel de la Société Mycologique du Nord de la France 79/80(1/2): 1–185.
  • Craig S, Vaughan LJ, Holmes GD, May TW (2023) Pseudobaeospora taluna (Fungi: Agaricales) newly described from southern Australia. Australian Journal of Taxonomy 24: 1–16. https://doi.org/10.54102/ajt
  • Criscuolo A, Gribaldo S (2010) BMGE (Block Mapping and Gathering with Entropy): a new software for selection of phylogenetic informative regions from multiple sequence alignments. BMC Evolutionary Biology 10: 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-10-210
  • Cubeta MA, Echandi E, Abernethy T, Vilgalys R (1991) Characterization of anastomosis groups of binucleate Rhizoctonia species using restriction analysis of an amplified ribosomal RNA gene. Phytopathology 81: 1395–1400. https://doi.org/10.1094/Phyto-81-1395
  • Dentinger BT, Gaya E, O’Brien H, Suz LM, Lachlan R, Díaz-Valderrama JR, Koch RA, Aime MC (2015) Tales from the crypt: genome mining from fungarium specimens improves resolution of the mushroom tree of life. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 117(1): 11–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/bij.12553
  • Desjardin DE (2004) A new species of Pseudobaeospora from California. Mycotaxon 90(1): 69–76.
  • Desjardin DE, Hemmes DE, Perry BA (2014) A ruby-colored Pseudobaeospora species is described as new from material collected on the island of Hawaii. Mycologia 106(3): 456–463. https://doi.org/10.3852/13-030
  • Edgar RC (2004) MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Research 32(5): 1792–1797. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkh340
  • Favre J (1960) Catalogue descriptif des champignons supérieurs de la zone subalpine du Parc National Suisse. Ergebn Wiss Untersuch Schweiz Nationalparkes 6: 323–610.
  • Gross G (1972) Kernzahl und sporenvolumen bei einigen Hymenogasterarten. Zeitschrift für Pilzkunde 38: 109–158.
  • Halama M, Pech P, Shiryaev A (2017) Contribution to the knowledge of Ramariopsis subarctica (Clavariaceae, Basidiomycota). Polish Botanical Journal 62(1): 123–133. https://doi.org/10.1515/pbj-2017-0011
  • Halling R (1979) Notes on Collybia. I. Collybia alkalivirens. Mycotaxon 8: 453–458.
  • Hausknecht A, Krisai-Greilhuber I, Pidlich-Aigner H, Klofac W, Oswald W, Oswald I (2012) Seltene oder kritische Großpilze aus Österreich. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Pilzkunde 21: 135–158.
  • He M, Zhao R, Hyde KD, Begerow D, Kemler M, Yurkov A, McKenzie EHC, Raspé O, Kakishima M, Sánchez-Ramírez S, Vellinga EC, Halling R, Papp V, Zmitrovich IV, Buyck B, Ertz D, Wijayawardene NN, Cui B-K, Schoutteten N, Liu X-Z, Li T-H, Yao Y-J, Zhu X-Y, Liu A-Q, Li G-J, Zhang M-Z, Ling Z-L, Cao B, Antonín V, Boekhout T, Barbosa da Silva BD, De Crop E, Decock C, Dima B, Dutta AK, Fell JW, Geml J, Ghobad-Nejhad M, Giachini AJ, Gibertoni TB, Gorjón SP, Haelewaters D, He S-H, Hodkinson BP, Horak E, Hoshino T, Justo A, Lim YW, Menolli Jr N, Mešić A, Moncalvo J-M, Mueller GM, Nagy LG, Nilsson RH, Noordeloos M, Nuytinck J, Orihara T, Ratchadawan C, Rajchenberg M, Silva-Filho AGS, Sulzbacher MA, Tkalčec Z, Valenzuela R, Verbeken A, Vizzini A, Wartchow F, Wei T-Z, Weiß M, Zhao C-L, Kirk PM (2019) Notes, outline and divergence times of Basidiomycota. Fungal Diversity 99: 105–367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-019-00435-4
  • He X-L, Li T-H, Xi P-G, Shen Y-H (2013) Phylogeny of Entoloma s.l. subgenus Pouzarella, with descriptions of five new species from China. Fungal Diversity 58(1): 227–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-012-0212-7
  • He Z-M, Chen ZH, Bau T, Wang G-S, Yang Z-L (2023) Systematic arrangement within the family Clitocybaceae (Tricholomatineae, Agaricales): phylogenetic and phylogenomic evidence, morphological data and muscarine-producing innovation. Fungal Diversity 123: 1–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-023-00527-2
  • Heinemann P (1978) Sericeomyces, genre nouveau de Leucocoprineae (Agaricaceae). Bulletin du Jardin Botanique National de Belgique 48(3/4): 399–407. https://doi.org/10.2307/3667940
  • Hibbett D, Donoghoue MJ (2001) Analysis of character correlations among wood decay mechanisms, mating systems, and substrate ranges in Homobasidiomycetes. Systematic Biology 50(2): 215–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150121079
  • Hibbett DS, Gilbert LB, Donoghue MJ (2000) Evolutionary instability of ectomycorrhizal symbioses in Basidiomycetes. Nature 407(6803): 506–508. https://doi.org/10.1038/35035065
  • Hofstetter V, Clémençon H, Vilgalys R., Moncalvo J-M (2002) Phylogenetic analyses of the Lyophylleae (Agaricales, Basidiomycota) based on nuclear and mitochondrial rDNA sequences. Mycological Research 106(9): 1046–1059. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095375620200641X
  • Horak E (1964) Notes sur Pseudobaeospora Sing. (1942), excl. Lepiota, sect. Sericellae. Revue de Mycologie 29: 72–81.
  • Horak E (1968) Synopsis Generum Agaricalium. Beiträge zur Kryptogamenflora der Schweiz 13: 1–742.
  • Horak E (2005) Die Röhrlinge und Blätterpilze Europas 6. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1–555.
  • Hwang S, Kim J (1995) Nucleotide sequence analysis of the 5s ribosomal RNA genes of the mushroom Tricholoma matsutake. Journal of Microbiology 33(2): 136–141.
  • Hyde KD, Hongsanan S, Jeewon R, Bhat DJ, McKenzie EHC, Gareth Jones EB, Phookamsak R, Ariyawansa HA, Boonmee S, Zhao Q, Abdel-Aziz FA, Abdel-Wahab MA, Banmai S, Chomnunti P, Cui B-K, Daranagama DA, Das K, Dayarathne MC, de Silva NI, Dissanayake AJ, Doilom M, Ekanayaka AH, Gibertoni TB, Góes-Neto A, Huang S-K, Jayasiri SC, Jayawardena RS, Konta S, Lee HB, Li W-J, Lin C-G, Liu J-K, Lu Y-Z, Luo Z-L, Manawasinghe IS, Manimohan P, Mapook A, Niskanen T, Norphanphoun C, Papizadeh M, Perera RH, Phukhamsakda C, Richter C, de A Santiago ALCM, Drechsler-Santos ER, Senanayake IC, Tanaka K, Tennakoon TMDS, Thambugala KM, Tian Q, Tibpromma S, Thongbai B, Vizzini A, Wanasinghe DN, Wijayawardene NN, Wu H-X, Yang J, Zeng X-Y, Zhang H, Zhang J-F, Bulgakov TS, Camporesi E, Bahkali AH, Amoozegar MA, Araujo-Neta LS, Ammirati JF, Baghela A, Bhatt RP, Bojantchev D, Buyck B, da Silva GA, de Lima CLF, de Oliveira RJV, de Souza CAF, Dai Y-C, Dima B, Duong TT, Ercole E, Mafalda-Freire F, Ghosh A, Hashimoto A, Kamolhan S, Kang J-C, Karunarathna SC, Kirk PM, Kytövuori I, Lantieri A, Liimatainen K, Liu Z-Y, Liu X-Z, Lücking R, Medardi G, Mortimer PE, Nguyen TTT, Promputtha I, Raj KNA, Reck MA, Lumyong S, Shahzadeh-Fazeli SA, Stadler M, Soudi MR, Su H-Y, Takahashi T, Tangthirasunun N, Uniyal P, Wang Y, Wen T-C, Xu J-C, Zhang Z-K, Zhao Y-C, Zhou J-L, Zhu L (2016) Fungal diversity notes 367–490: taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungal taxa. Fungal Diversity 80: 1–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-016-0373-x
  • Jamoni PG (1997) Una nuova stazione in Valsesia di Pseudobaeospora pillodii (Quél.) Horak. Funghi e Ambiente 73: 16.
  • Jamoni PG, Bon M (1996) Quelques récoltes subalpines du massif du Mont Rose et des alentoures. Bulletin trimestriel de la Fédération mycologique Dauphiné-Savoie 143(36): 7–15.
  • Kalinina LB, Bolshakov SYU, Bulyonkova TM (2020) New records of basidiomycetes from the Pskov region in the Polistovskiy State Nature Reserve (Russia). Nature Conservation Research 5(3): 9–22. https://doi.org/10.24189/ncr.2020.024
  • Karasch P (2004) Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Pilzflora des Fünfseenlandes IV – Ökologische Pilzkartierung auf einer Huteweide im Landkreis Weilheim (Oberbayern). Neue Erkenntnisse aus dem Jahr 2003. Zeitschrift für Mykologie 70(1): 23–47.
  • Kirk PM, Cannon RF, David JC, Stalpers JA [Eds] (2008) Dictionary of Fungi, 10th ed. CAB International, Wallingford, Oxon, 1–771.
  • Kluting KL, Baroni TJ, Bergemann SE (2014) Toward a stable classification of genera within the Entolomataceae: a phylogenetic re-evaluation of the Rhodocybe-Clitopilus clade. Mycologia 106(6): 1127–1142. https://doi.org/10.3852/13-270
  • Kotilová-Kubičková L, Pouzar Z (1988) Three types of basidiospores in Amanita. Česká Mykologie 42(2): 65–70.
  • Krieglsteiner LG (1999) Pilze im Naturraum Mainfrankische Platten und ihre Einbindung in die Vegetation. Regensburger Mykologische Schriften 9: 1–905.
  • Krieglsteiner LG (2010) Pilzausstellung im Steigerwaldstüble. Der Tintling 66(5): 73–75.
  • Kühner R (1969) Contribution ä la systématique des Orcellées. Bulletin mensuel de la Société linnéenne de Lyon 38: 247.
  • Kühner R, Romagnesi H (1953) Flore Analytique des Champignons Supérieurs (Agarics, Bolets, Chanterelles). Masson, Paris, 1–556.
  • Kühner R, Romagnesi H (1954) Compléments à la Flore Analytique. III. Espèces nouvelles, critiques ou rares de Pleurotacées, Marasmiacées et Tricholomacées. Bulletin de la Société des Naturalistes d’Oyonnax 8: 74–131.
  • Kuyper T (1986) A revision of the genus Inocybe in Europe. I. Subgenus Inosperma and the smooth-spored species of subgenus Inocybe. Persoonia – Supplement 3(1): 1–247.
  • Læssøe T (2008) Pseudobaeospora. In: Knudsen H, Vesterholt J (Eds) Funga Nordica. Nordsvamp, Copenhagen, 515–517.
  • Læssøe T (2012) Pseudobaeospora. In: Knudsen H, Vesterholt J (Eds) Funga Nordica 2nd edition. Nordsvamp, Copenhagen, 488–489.
  • Largent DL, Baroni TJ (1988) How to Identify Mushrooms to Genus VI: Modern Genera. Mad River Press, Eureka, California, 1–277.
  • Largent DL, Bergemann SE, Abell-Davis SE (2014) Entoloma species from New South Wales and northeastern Queensland, Australia. Mycotaxon 129(2): 329–359. https://doi.org/10.5248/129.329
  • Li GJ, Hyde KD, Zhao RL, Hongsanan S, Abdel-Aziz FA, Abdel-Wahab MA, Alvarado P, Alves-Silva G, Ammirati JF, Ariyawansa HA, Baghela A, Bahkali AH, Beug M, Bhat DJ, Bojantchev D, Boonpratuang T, Bulgakov TS, Camporesi E, Boro MC, Ceska O, Chakraborty D, Chen JJ, Chethana KWT, Chomnunti P, Consiglio G, Cui BK, Dai DQ, Dai YC, Daranagama DA, Das K, Dayarathne MC, De Crop E, De Oliveira RJV, de Souza CAF, de Souza JI, Dentinger BTM, Dissanayake AJ, Doilom M, Drechsler-Santos ER, Ghobad-Nejhad M, Gilmore SP, Góes-Neto A, Gorczak M, Haitjema CH, Hapuarachchi KK, Hashimoto A, He MQ, Henske JK, Hirayama K, Iribarren MJ, Jayasiri SC, Jayawardena RS, Jeon SJ, Jerônimo GH, Jesus AL, Jones EBG, Kang JC, Karunarathna SC, Kirk PM, Konta S, Kuhnert E, Langer E, Lee HS, Lee HB, Li WJ, Li XH, Liimatainen K, Lima DX, Lin CG, Liu JK, Liu XZ, Liu ZY, Luangsa-ard JJ, Lücking R, Lumbsch HT, Lumyong S, Leaño EM, Marano AV, Matsumura M, McKenzie EHC, Mongkolsamrit S, Mortimer PE, Nguyen TTT, Niskanen T, Norphanphoun C, O’Malley MA, Parnmen S, Pawłowska J, Perera RH, Phookamsak R, Phukhamsakda C, Pires-Zottarelli CLA, Raspé O, Reck MA, Rocha SCO, de Santiago ALCMA, Senanayake IC, Setti L, Shang QJ, Singh SK, Sir EB, Solomon KV, Song J, Srikitikulchai P, Stadler M, Suetrong S, Takahashi H, Takahashi T, Tanaka K, Tang LP, Thambugala KM, Thanakitpipattana D, Theodorou MK, Thongbai B, Thummarukcharoen T, Tian Q, Tibpromma S, Verbeken A, Vizzini A, Vlasák J, Voigt K, Wanasinghe DN, Wang Y, Weerakoon G, Wen HA, Wen TC, Wijayawardene NN, Wongkanoun S, Wrzosek M, Xiao YP, Xu JC, Yan JY, Yang J, Yang SD, Hu Y, Zhang JF, Zhao J, Zhou LW, Peršoh D, Phillips AJL, Maharachchikumbura SSN (2016) Fungal diversity notes 253–366: taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungal taxa. Fungal Diversity 78: 1–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-016-0366-9
  • Locquin M (1952) Sur la non-validité de quelques genres d’Agaricales. Bulletin trimestriel de la Société mycologique de France 68: 165–169.
  • Lodge DJ, Padamsee M, Matheny PB, Aime MC, Cantrell SA, Boertmann D, Kovalenko A, Vizzini A, Dentinger BTM, Kirk PM, Ainsworth AM, Moncalvo J-M, Vilgalys R, Larsson E, Lücking R, Griffith GW, Smith ME, Norvell LL, Desjardin DE, Redhead SA, Ovrebo CL, Lickey EB, Ercole E, Hughes KW, Courtecuisse R, Young A, Binder M, Minnis AM, Lindner DL, Ortiz-Santana B, Haight J, Læssøe T, Baroni TJ, Geml J, Hattori T (2013) Molecular phylogeny, morphology, pigment chemistry and ecology in Hygrophoraceae (Agaricales). Fungal Diversity 64(1): 1–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-013-0259-0
  • Ludwig E (2000) Pilzkompendium, Band 1, Abbildungen. IHW-Verlag, Eching, 1–192.
  • Matheny PB (2005) Improving phylogenetic inference of mushrooms with RPB1 and RPB2 nucleotide sequences (Inocybe; Agaricales). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 35(1): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2004.11.014
  • Matheny PB, Curtis JC, Hofstter V, Aime MC, Moncalvo J-M, Ge Z-W, Slot JC, Ammirati JF, Baroni TJ, Bougher NL, Hughes KW, Lodge DJ, Kerrigan RW, Seidl MT, Aanen DK, DeNitis M, Daniele GM, Desjardin DE, Kropp BR, Norvell LL, Parker A, Vellinga EC, Vilgalys R, Hibbett DS (2006) Major clades of Agaricales: a multilocus phylogenetic overview. Mycologia 98: 982–995. https://doi.org/10.1080/15572536.2006.11832627
  • Matheny PB, Wang Z, Binder M, Curtis JM, Lim YW, Nilsson RH, Hughes KW, Hofstetter V, Ammirati JF, Schoch CL, Langer E, Langer G, McLaughlin DJ, Wilson AW, Frøslev T, Ge Z-W, Kerrigan RW, Slot JC, Yang Z-L, Baroni TJ, Fischer M, Hosaka K, Matsuura K, Seidl MT, Vauras J, Hibbett DS (2007) Contributions of rpb2 and tef1 to the phylogeny of mushrooms and allies (Basidiomycota, Fungi). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 43: 430–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2006.08.024
  • Matheny PB, Moreau P-A, Vizzini A, Harrower M, De Haan A, Contu M, Curti M (2014) Crassisporium and Romagnesiella: two new genera of dark-spored Agaricales. Systematics and Biodiversity 13(1): 28–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/14772000.2014.967823
  • Matheny PB, Lebeuf R, Sánchez-García M, Graddy MG, Trudell SA, Wood MG, Vellinga EC (2024) Four new species of Albomagister (Agaricales) from eastern North America. Botany 102: 355–365. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjb-2024-0058
  • Matsushita N, Kikuchi K, Sasaki Y, Guerin-Laguette A, Lapeyrie F, Vaario L-M, Intini M, Suzuki K (2005) Genetic relationship of Tricholoma matsutake and T. nauseosum from the Northern Hemisphere based on analyses of ribosomal DNA spacer regions. Mycoscience 46: 90–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10267-004-0220-X
  • Miller MA, Pfeiffer W, Schwartz T (2010) Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. In: Proceedings of the Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE), 14 Nov. 2010, New Orleans, LA, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/GCE.2010.5676129
  • Mleczko P (2004) Rhodocollybia butyracea (Bull.: Fr.) Lennox (forma butyracea) + Pinus sylvestris L. Descriptions of Ectomycorrhizae 7/8: 101–108.
  • Moncalvo J-M, Lutzoni FM, Rehner SA, Johnson J, Vilgalys R (2000) Phylogenetic relationships of agaric fungi based on nuclear large subunit ribosomal DNA sequences. Systematic Biology 49: 278–305. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/49.2.278
  • Moncalvo J-M, Vilgalys R, Redhead SA, Johnson JE, James TY, Aime CM, Hofstetter V, Verduin SJW, Larsson E, Baroni TJ, Thorn RG, Jacobsson S, Clémençon H, Miller OK (2002) One hundred and seventeen clades of euagarics. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 23: 357–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1055-7903(02)00027-1
  • Moreau P-A, Bellanger J-M, Biancardini S, Richard F (2015) Albomagister alesandrii sp. nov., un nouvel element du patrimoine naturel de la Corse. Bulletin Semestriel de la Fédération des Associations Mycologiques Méditerranéennes 48: 7–14.
  • Morozova OV, Popov ES (2013) New records of two species of the genus Pseudobaeospora (Basidiomycota, Agaricales) from Russia. Novosti Sistematiki Nizshikh Rastenii 47: 127–134. https://doi.org/10.31111/nsnr/2013.47.127
  • Moukha S, Ferandon C, Beroard E, Guinberteau J, Castandet B, Callac P, Creppy E, Barroso G (2013) A molecular contribution to the assessment of the Tricholoma equestre species complex. Fungal Biology 117(2): 145–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funbio.2013.01.003
  • Moyne G, Moingeon JM (2018) Du nouveau dans la buxaie de Courcelles-lès-Quingey: Albomagister alessandri et Pseudobaeospora brunnea. Documents Mycologiques 37: 191–200.
  • Musumeci E, Contu M (2014) Tephroderma (Agaricomycetidae, Tricholomatoid Clade). Un nuovo genere di basidiomiceti lamellati dalla Francia. Rivista micologica romana-Bollettino AMER 91(1): 20–30.
  • Peintner U, Bougher NL, Castellano MA (2001) Multiple origins of sequestrate Fungi related to Cortinarius (Cortinariaceae). American Journal of Botany 88(12): 2168–2179. https://doi.org/10.2307/3558378
  • Petersen RH, Hughes KW (2010) The Xerula/Oudemansiella complex (Agaricales). J. Cramer/Gebrüder Borntraeger Verlag, Stuttgart, 1–625.
  • Qin J, Feng B, Yang Z-L, Li YC, Ratkowsky D, Gates G, Takahashi H, Rexer KH, Kost GW, Karunarathna SC (2014) The taxonomic foundation, species circumscription and continental endemisms of Singerocybe: evidence from morphological and molecular data. Mycologia 106(5): 1015–1026. https://doi.org/10.3852/13-338
  • Quang DN, Spiteller P, Porzel A, Schmidt J, Geissler T, Arnold N, Wessjohann L (2008) Alkaloids from the mushroom Pseudobaeospora pyrifera, pyriferines A-C. Journal of Natural Products 71(9): 1620–1622. https://doi.org/10.1021/np800365f
  • Quélet L (1890) [1889]. Quelques espèces critiques ou nouvelles de la Flore mycologique de France. Compte Rendu de la Association Française pour l’Avancement des Sciences 18(2): 508–514.
  • Rawla GS, Arya S (1991) Studies on the agarics of northwest India – new species. Boletus 15: 111–124.
  • Redhead SA (1982) Pseudobaeospora pillodii. Fungi Canadensis 217.
  • Rehner SA, Buckley E (2005) A Beauveria phylogeny inferred from nuclear ITS and EF1-a sequences: evidence for cryptic diversification and links to Cordyceps teleomorphs. Mycologia 97: 84–98. https://doi.org/10.3852/mycologia.97.1.84
  • Rinaldi AC, Comadini O, Kuyper TW (2008) Ectomycorrhizal fungal diversity: separating the wheat from the chaff. Fungal Diversity 33: 1–45.
  • Rubio Casa L, Palazòn A (2019) Pseudobaeospora brunnea Arauzo, P. Iglesias & J. Fernández. Societat Catalana de Micologia. Bolets de Catalunya 38: 1893.
  • Sánchez-García M, Matheny PB (2017) Is the switch to an ectomycorrhizal state an evolutionary key innovation in mushroom-forming fungi? A case study in the Tricholomatineae (Agaricales). Evolution 71(1): 51–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.13099
  • Sánchez-García M, Matheny PB, Palfner G, Lodge DJ (2014) Deconstructing the Tricholomataceae (Agaricales) and introduction of the new genera Albomagister, Corneriella, Pogonoloma and Pseudotricholoma. Taxon 63(5): 993–1007. https://doi.org/10.12705/635.635.3
  • Sánchez-García M, Henkel TW, Aime MC, Smith ME, Matheny PB (2016) Guyanagarika, a new ectomycorrhizal genus of Agaricales from the Neotropics. Fungal Biology 120(12): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funbio.2016.08.005
  • Sánchez-García M, Ryberg M, Khan FK, Varga T, Nagy LG, Hibbett DS (2020) Fruiting body form, not nutritional mode, is the major driver of diversification in mushroom-forming fungi. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 117(51): 32528–32534. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1922539117
  • Sánchez-García M, Adamčíková K, Moreau P-A, Vizzini A, Jančovičová S, Kiran M, Caboň M, Matheny PB, Adamčík S (2021) The genus Dermoloma is more diverse than expected and forms a monophyletic lineage in the Tricholomataceae. Mycological Progress 20: 11–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-020-01651-y
  • Schirkonyer U, Bauer C, Rothe GM (2013) Ectomycorrhizal diversity at five different tree species in forests of the Taunus Mountains in Central Germany. Open Journal of Ecology 3(1): 66–81. https://doi.org/10.4236/oje.2013.31009
  • Senn-Irlet B (1995) The genus Crepidotus (Fr.) Staude in Europe. Persoonia 16(1): 1–80.
  • Sesli E, Vizzini A, Ercole E, Contu M (2016) Clitolyophyllum akcaabatense gen. nov., sp. nov. (Agaricales, Tricholomatineae); a new fan-shaped clitocyboid agaric from Turkey. Botany 94(2): 73–80. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjb-2015-0172
  • Singer R (1938) Notes sur quelques Basidiomycetes. Revue de Mycologie 3(6): 187–199.
  • Singer R (1942) Type studies on agarics. Lloydia 5: 97–135.
  • Singer R (1951) [1949] The Agaricales in modern taxonomy. Lilloa 22: 1–832.
  • Singer R (1962) The Agaricales in modern taxonomy. 2nd edition. J. Cramer, Weinheim, 1–915.
  • Singer R (1969) Mycoflora australis. Nova Hedwigia Beihefte 29: 1–405.
  • Singer R (1975) The Agaricales in modern taxonomy. 3rd edition. J Cramer, Vaduz, 1–912.
  • Singer R (1986) The Agaricales in modern taxonomy, 4th edn. Koeltz Scientific Books, Königstein, 1–981.
  • Singer R, Clémençon H (1972) Notes on some leucosporous and rhodosporous European agarics. Nova Hedwigia 23: 305–351.
  • Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S (2013) MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30: 2725–2729. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst197
  • Tedersoo L, Smith ME (2013) Lineages of ectomycorrhizal fungi revisited: Foraging strategies and novel lineages revealed by sequences from belowground. Fungal Biology Reviews 27: 83–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbr.2013.09.001
  • Tedersoo L, May TW, Smith ME (2010) Ectomycorrhizal lifestyle in fungi: global diversity, distribution, and evolution of phylogenetic lineages. Mycorrhiza 20: 217–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-009-0274-x
  • Varga T, Krizsán K, Földi C, Dima B, Sánchez-García M, Sánchez-Ramírez S, Szöllősi GJ, Szarkándi JG, Papp V, Albert L, Andreopoulos W, Angelini C, Antonín V, Barry KW, Bougher NL, Buchanan P, Buyck B, Bense V, Catcheside P, Chovatia M, Cooper J, Dämon W, Desjardin D, Finy P, Geml J, Haridas S, Hughes K, Justo A, Karasiński D, Kautmanova I, Kiss B, Kocsubé S, Kotiranta H, LaButti KM, Lechner BE, Liimatainen K, Lipzen A, Lukács Z, Mihaltcheva S, Morgado LN, Niskanen T, Noordeloos ME, Ohm RA, Ortiz-Santana B, Ovrebo C, Rácz N, Riley R, Savchenko A, Shiryaev A, Soop K, Spirin V, Szebenyi C, Tomšovský M, Tulloss RE, Uehling J, Grigoriev IV, Vágvölgyi C, Papp T, Martin FM, Miettinen O, Hibbett DS, Nagy LG (2019) Megaphylogeny resolves global patterns of mushroom evolution. Nature Ecology & Evolution 3: 668–678. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-019-0834-1
  • Vellinga EC (2001) Studies in Lepiota III. Some species from California, U.S.A. Mycotaxon 80: 285–295.
  • Vellinga EC (2003) Phylogeny and taxonomy of lepiotaceous fungi. PhD thesis. Universiteit Leiden, Leiden, 1–259.
  • Vellinga E, Contu M, Vizzini A (2010) Leucoagaricus decipiens and La. erythrophaeus, a new species pair in sect. Piloselli. Mycologia 102: 447–454. https://doi.org/10.3852/09-164
  • Vilgalys R, Hester M (1990) Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. Journal of Bacteriology 172: 4238–4246. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.172.8.4238-4246.1990
  • Vizzini A, Ercole E, Contu M (2012) A contribution to the ITS-LSU phylogeny of the genus Leucopaxillus (/tricholomatoid clade, Agaricales), with three new genera and notes on Porpoloma. Mycosphere 3(1): 79–90. https://doi.org/10.5943/mycosphere/3/1/10
  • Vizzini A, Consiglio G, Marchetti M, Alvarado P (2020a) Insights into the Tricholomatineae (Agaricales, Agaricomycetes): a new arrangement of Biannulariaceae and Callistosporium, Callistosporiaceae fam. nov., Xerophorus stat. nov., and Pleurocollybia incorporated into Callistosporium. Fungal Diversity 101: 211–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-020-00441-x
  • Vizzini A, Alvarado P, Consiglio G, Marchetti M, Xu J (2024) Family matters inside the order Agaricales: systematic reorganization and classification of incertae sedis clitocyboid, pleurotoid and tricholomatoid taxa based on an updated 6-gene phylogeny. Studies in Mycology 107: 67–148. https://doi.org/10.3114/sim.2024.107.02
  • von Bonsdorff T, Niskanen T, Kytövuori I, Liimatainen K, Vauras J, Kokkonen K, Huhtinen S, Puolasmaa A, Kosonen L (2012) New national and regional biological records for Finland 1. Contributions to agaricoid and ascomycetoid taxa of fungi. Memoranda Socie­tatis pro Fauna et Flora Fennica 88: 53–60. https://journal.fi/msff/article/view/7817
  • Voto P (2009) Proposta di una sistematica infragenerica del Genere Pseudobaeospora, fondata su basi morfologiche, e note su due specie non ancora descritte. Rivista di Micologia 52(4): 291–311.
  • Voto P (2015) The Genus Pseudobaeospora, some emendments. Bollettino AMER 95(2): 46–47.
  • Voto P (2018) The Pseudobaeospora taxa hosted in the Helsinki Herbarium. Rivista micologica romana-Bollettino AMER 104(2): 83–87.
  • Voto P, Soop K (2018) Pseudobaeospora aciculifera, a new species from New Zealand. Rivista micologica romana-Bollettino AMER 103(34): 23–26.
  • Wasser SP (1980) Flora Fungorum RSS Ucrainicae: Agarikovye griby. Naukova Dumka, Kiev, 1–326.
  • Wasser SP (2002) Biodiversity of Cyanoprocaryotes, Algae and Fungi of Israel. Family Agaricaceae (Fr.) Cohn (Basidiomycetes) of Israel mycobiota. 1. Tribe Agariceae Pat. ARA Gantner Verlag K-G, Ruggell, 1–212.
  • Watling R (1992) Armillaria Staude in the Cameroon Republic. Persoonia 14(4): 483–491.
  • White TJ, Bruns T, Lee SJWT, Taylor J (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ (Eds) PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. Academic Press, New York, 315–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-372180-8.50042-1
  • Wu SY, Li JJ, Zhang M, Yu XD, Lv SX, Cao DX (2017) Pseudobaeospora lilacina sp. nov., the first report of the genus from China. Mycotaxon 132(2): 327–335. https://doi.org/10.5248/132.327
  • Yang KL, Lin JY, Li G-M, Li T, Yang ZL (2024) Rediscovering Leucoagaricus sinicus, with the recognition of Leucoagaricus and Leucocoprinus as separate genera, and two new genera in Agaricaceae (Basidiomycota). Phytotaxa 676(3): 199–255. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.676.3.1
  • Zhao R-L, Li G-J, Sánchez-Ramírez S, Stata M, Yang Z-L, Wu G, Dai Y-C, He S-H, Cui B-K, Zhou J-L, Wu F, He M-Q, Moncalvo J-M, Hyde KD (2017) A six-gene phylogenetic overview of Basidiomycota and allied phyla with estimated divergence times of higher taxa and a phyloproteomics perspective. Fungal Diversity 84(1): 43–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-017-0381-5

Supplementary materials

Supplementary material 1 

List of specimens

Alfredo Vizzini, Giovanni Consiglio, Katarína Adamčíková, Ledo Setti, Slavomír Adamčík

Data type: docx

Explanation note: List of specimens used in the molecular analyses. Newly generated sequences are in bold.

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Download file (144.37 kb)
Supplementary material 2 

Bayesian inference phylogram

Alfredo Vizzini, Giovanni Consiglio, Katarína Adamčíková, Ledo Setti, Slavomír Adamčík

Data type: pdf

Explanation note: Bayesian inference phylogram built with nucleotide sequence data of four loci (nrLSU, nrSSU, RPB2-exons and TEF1-exons) of the main lineages inside the suborder Tricholomatineae of the order Agaricales, rooted with Suillus pictus (Boletales), Ampulloclitocybe clavipes and Pseudoarmillariella ectypoides (Hygrophorineae, Agaricales) as outgroups. All family-level clades were not collapsed. Nodes were annotated with Bayesian PP (left) and ML BP (right) values, with the significance threshold considered as Bayesian PP ≥ 0.95 and/or ML BP ≥ 70%. Subsignificant support values were annotated in parentheses. Boldface names represent samples sequenced for this study.

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Download file (76.05 kb)
login to comment